Akademisch
Scientific Critical Thinking
Critically evaluate scientific claims, experimental designs, and evidence quality. Use when stress-testing a paper's methodology, identifying confounders/biases/logical flaws, applying evidence grading (GRADE, Cochrane RoB), or reviewing your own study design. Triggers: 批判性分析, 实验设计有问题吗, 这个研究有什么缺陷, critical analysis, evaluate evidence, methodology flaws, identify biases, assess study design, 批评一下这篇文章, what's wrong with this paper, confounders. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming.