苏格拉底的思维框架与提问方法。基于柏拉图对话录（《申辩篇》《理想国》《会饮篇》《斐多篇》《美诺篇》《泰阿泰德篇》）、色诺芬《回忆苏格拉底》、亚里士多德相关记述等20+来源深度调研，提炼5个核心思想模型、7条处世启发式和完整的表达DNA。用途：作为思维顾问，用苏格拉底的视角分析思维盲区、逻辑谬误、认知偏差、人生选择等问题。当用户提到「用苏格拉底的视角」「苏格拉底会怎么看」「苏格拉底模式」「socrates perspective」时使用。也适用于：批判性思维训练、逻辑分析、自我反思、定义澄清、价值观审视、论证分析。即使用户只是说「帮我想清楚」「这个逻辑对不对」「产婆术」「追问一下」「我的思维有没有漏洞」也可触发。不要在用户只是问「这个决策靠谱吗」「帮我做选择」等一般性问题时触发——只在涉及批判性思维、逻辑追问、认知谦逊、定义澄清等苏格拉底核心方法论时激活。

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Nietzsche Perspective

以尼采的视角回答问题——超人哲学、权力意志、价值重估与永恒回归

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Foucault Perspective

以米歇尔·福柯的视角分析权力、知识、话语与规训机制，揭示隐藏在日常制度背后的权力运作逻辑

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Picasso Perspective

用毕加索的创造力哲学与艺术生涯来审视问题，以不断打破自己、多产和创造性挪用来回应挑战

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Faraday Perspective

用法拉第的实验精神、自学成才的直觉力与用日常事物解释科学的天赋来分析和解决问题

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Matsushita Perspective

以松下幸之助的自来水哲学、经营即育人和朴素智慧来分析问题

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Mozi Perspective

以墨子的视角回应问题——兼爱非攻的普世关怀，工程思维的实用主义，逻辑严密的论证风格。

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Newton Perspective

用牛顿的第一性原理思维、数学严密性与系统化推理方式来分析和解决问题

Panmax0

철학 및 윤리

Ceibs Navigator

Research advisor embodying CEIBS (Shanghai) intellectual tradition — China's state-capitalism interface, institutional duality, guanxi, and strategic navigation between Western theory and Chinese business reality. Invoke for China-focused research, institutional navigation, or when Western frameworks need stress-testing against Chinese evidence.

phdemotions0

철학 및 윤리

Gibs Pioneer

Research advisor embodying GIBS (Johannesburg) intellectual tradition — African emerging markets, base-of-pyramid strategy, Ubuntu leadership philosophy, and theory-building from contexts that mainstream management scholarship ignores. Invoke for Africa-focused research, emerging market strategy, or when research needs decentering from Western assumptions.

phdemotions0

철학 및 윤리

Full Stack Forensics

Never accept a surface answer. Run the entire tool stack against a problem until ground truth is established — not probable truth, not first-result truth. Ground truth.

Phoenix-Rising-Tech0

철학 및 윤리

Buddy Pedagogy Concept Contrast

Contrast two related concepts so the learner stops conflating them.

prashantbhudwal0

철학 및 윤리

Basis Fundamenten Schrijver

Expert in het vertalen van filosofische concepten naar een logisch en onweerlegbaar ethisch fundament voor zowel mensen als synthetische intelligentie (AI). Gebruik deze skill om het boek 'De Competente Toekomst' uit te breiden naar een universeel protocol gebaseerd op natuurwetten en rationele noodzaak.

profdrkdc0

철학 및 윤리

Decomplection-First Design Skill

Decomplection per Rich Hickey: simple = one fold (objective, about the artifact), easy = nearby (subjective, about the programmer). Complect = to braid together. Three lenses: Hickey (decomposition), Meadows (interaction count), Rams (clarity). State is never simple. DDRY = extracted code must be composable, not just not-repeated. 'There is no three' — reject what doesn't serve simplicity or feedback. Use when making design decisions, evaluating trade-offs, choosing approaches, extracting shared code, or reviewing for entanglement.

pyze0

철학 및 윤리

Reflect

Deep reflection on the skill learning system itself. Analyzes what's working, what's stale, and proposes structural improvements. The meta-skill.

QSchlegel0

철학 및 윤리

Socratic Teacher

Guide a user to understand a topic through Socratic questioning rather than explanation. Use when the user wants to think their way to an idea, build intuition before formalism, work one question at a time, or learn prompts such as "teach me [topic] Socratically", "help me figure this out without telling me", or "quiz me until I understand".

rajvermacas0

철학 및 윤리

Rhetoric

Toulmin argumentation engine — symbolic validation of argument structure, inferential integrity, and audience-calibrated delivery.

Raudbjorn0

철학 및 윤리

Researcher

Research and investigation skill for gathering information from multiple sources. Use when user says "research", "investigate", "gather information", "look up", "find out about", "analyze topic", "explore options", "survey alternatives", "collect data on", "background research", "discovery", "fact-finding", "information gathering", "due diligence", "explore requirements".

ribatshepo0

철학 및 윤리

Health Medical Research

Clinical research methodology, biostatistics, epidemiology, and evidence-based medicine

RomulanAI0

철학 및 윤리

Challenge Assumptions

Break down to fundamentals and rebuild from base truths

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Consequences

Think through consequences of consequences

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Vital Few

Apply Pareto's principle (80/20 rule) to analyze arguments or current discussion

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Option Cost

Analyze what you give up by choosing this option

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Ethical Framework Application

Apply multiple ethical frameworks (deontological, consequentialist, virtue ethics, care ethics) systematically to moral problems and generate reasoned recommendations

RunnerQuan0

철학 및 윤리

Formal Logic Reasoner

Skill for formal logical reasoning and argument validation

RunnerQuan0

철학 및 윤리

Thought Experiment Design

Construct, analyze, and evaluate philosophical thought experiments to test intuitions, reveal conceptual commitments, and probe theoretical implications

RunnerQuan0

철학 및 윤리

Analyze-Think 150 Protocol

[31] ANALYZE. Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought.

RunnerQuan0

철학 및 윤리

Debate Workflow

Structured multi-perspective debate for important architectural decisions and complex trade-offs

rysweet0

철학 및 윤리 | Skills Pool

철학 및 윤리

철학 및 윤리

Bismarck Perspective

Wujun Perspective

Socrates Perspective

Nietzsche Perspective

Foucault Perspective

Picasso Perspective

Faraday Perspective

Matsushita Perspective

Mozi Perspective

Newton Perspective

Ceibs Navigator

Gibs Pioneer

Full Stack Forensics

Buddy Pedagogy Concept Contrast

Basis Fundamenten Schrijver

Decomplection-First Design Skill

Reflect

Socratic Teacher

Rhetoric

Researcher

Health Medical Research

Challenge Assumptions

Consequences

Vital Few

Option Cost

Ethical Framework Application

Formal Logic Reasoner

Thought Experiment Design

Analyze-Think 150 Protocol

Debate Workflow