철학 및 윤리

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

runmoore0

철학 및 윤리

think-analytical — Advanced Analytical Reasoning Methods

Advanced analytical reasoning methods — Analogical (cross-domain mapping, structural similarity), FirstPrinciples (fundamental decomposition, axiom derivation), MetaReasoning (strategic oversight of your own reasoning process), and Cryptanalytic (code-breaking, pattern extraction, weighted Decibans evidence). Use when the user invokes `/think analogical`, `/think firstprinciples`, `/think metareasoning`, or `/think cryptanalytic`, or asks to map one domain to another, decompose to fundamentals, reason about reasoning, or extract signal from noise.

danielsimonjr0

철학 및 윤리

Evidence Justification Assessment

Evaluate epistemic warrant, assess evidence quality and relevance, apply epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, and identify sources of knowledge

RunnerQuan0

철학 및 윤리

Ai Ethics

Responsible AI development and ethical considerations. Use when evaluating AI bias, implementing fairness measures, conducting ethical assessments, or ensuring AI systems align with human values.

DTMC-marketplace0

철학 및 윤리

Brainstorming

Validate and refine any idea through Socratic questioning before any implementation begins

karvifi0

철학 및 윤리

Spectra Discuss

Have a focused discussion about a topic and reach a conclusion

kaochenlong0

철학 및 윤리

Leap Year Analyzer

Analyze leap year calculations, calendar systems, and date validation logic. Use this when the user asks about leap year rules, calendar types (Gregorian, Julian, Hebrew, Chinese), year range validation (1582-9999), mathematical formulas, or needs to understand the core leap year detection algorithms.

ruchernchong0

철학 및 윤리

Matematico Tao

Matemático ultra-avançado inspirado em Terence Tao. Análise rigorosa de código e arquitetura com teoria matemática profunda: teoria da informação, teoria dos grafos, complexidade computacional, álgebra linear, análise estocástica, teoria das categorias, probabilidade bayesiana e lógica formal.

foolhardy450

철학 및 윤리

Option Cost

Analyze what you give up by choosing this option

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Vital Few

Apply Pareto's principle (80/20 rule) to analyze arguments or current discussion

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Consequences

Think through consequences of consequences

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Constant Comparison

Use when conducting the constant comparative method — comparing incidents to incidents, incidents to concepts, and concepts to concepts.

ccashwell0

철학 및 윤리

Bk Research

Research problem space, existing solutions, and trade-offs before committing to an approach. Use for novel problems, technology selection, or architecture decisions.

dikini0

철학 및 윤리

Estack Chris Voss

Applies Chris Voss negotiation principles from *Never Split the Difference* to any situation where understanding human psychology, persuasion, or influence would improve the output. Use when the user is navigating a situation involving another person, drafting communication that needs to land a certain way, or asking for advice on how to approach a difficult conversation — even if they don't explicitly ask for negotiation help. Do not use for coding, math, or factual lookups.

ElliotDrel0

철학 및 윤리

Feynman Explainer

**Feynman Explainer**: Simplify complex vault concepts using the Feynman Technique for deeper understanding. - MANDATORY TRIGGERS: explain simply, feynman, simplify, explain like, eli5, explain to me, make it simple, teach me

GianRomani0

철학 및 윤리

Challenge Assumptions

Break down to fundamentals and rebuild from base truths

royhenengel0

철학 및 윤리

Thinking In Forma

Use when you need to reason through a design decision, understand a ticket, explore a hunch, or compare options — works with or without existing artifacts

rodh0

철학 및 윤리

Reason

Understand through recursive decomposition and modular reconstruction of simple operations to reproduce emergent complexity. Use this skill whenever reasoning is required. Framework for [[#parse|parsing]], [[#branch|branching]], [[#reduce|reducing]], [[#ground|grounding]] and [[#emit|emitting]]. Employs metacognitive reasoning epistemology, leveraging first principles through recursive decomposition[^1]. Self-referential and scale-invariant.

jarbitechture0

철학 및 윤리

Causal Check

Check causal reasoning in debugging, root cause analysis, or system analysis. Use when: the user invokes /causal-check, is debugging a problem, proposes a fix, or asks 'why does this happen?'. Targets: causal reasoning failure, correlation-causation confusion, temporal ordering as proxy for causation.

jaysonmulwa0

철학 및 윤리

Evaluate Company

Deep ethical evaluation of a company before applying — culture, values alignment, red flags, and deal-breakers. Works with you to decide if this place deserves your application.

KennytheLema0

철학 및 윤리

Seo Fundamentals

Core principles of SEO including E-E-A-T, Core Web Vitals, technical foundations, content quality, and how modern search engines evaluate pages.

foolhardy450

철학 및 윤리

She Hulk

Ethical compliance auditing and LLM reasoning chain verification.

richardkfarber-del0

철학 및 윤리

Researcher

Research and investigation skill for gathering information from multiple sources. Use when user says "research", "investigate", "gather information", "look up", "find out about", "analyze topic", "explore options", "survey alternatives", "collect data on", "background research", "discovery", "fact-finding", "information gathering", "due diligence", "explore requirements".

ribatshepo0

철학 및 윤리

Openspec Explore

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

dnafication0

철학 및 윤리

Mayrlabs Internal Philosophy

Extracted Philosophy and Anti-Patterns from MayR Labs GEMINI.md

MayR-Labs0

철학 및 윤리

Adversarial Committee

Committee of personas with opposing propensities forcing genuine debate

DnfJeff0