Guide for recovering data from SQLite Write-Ahead Log (WAL) files that may be corrupted, encrypted, or inaccessible through standard methods. This skill should be used when tasks involve SQLite database recovery, WAL file analysis, encrypted database files, or discrepancies between tool outputs and filesystem access.
This skill provides systematic approaches for recovering data from SQLite Write-Ahead Log (WAL) files. WAL recovery tasks often involve files that are corrupted, encrypted, or exhibit unusual access patterns. The skill emphasizes thorough investigation over pattern-guessing and provides verification strategies to ensure actual data recovery rather than fabrication.
When recovering database records, the goal is to recover actual data, not to generate plausible data based on patterns. If data cannot be recovered through technical means, acknowledge failure rather than fabricate records.
Before attempting recovery, conduct thorough environment discovery:
using multiple methods:
LS, Read) to list directory contentsls -la, find, locate) independentlyCheck for discrepancies between tools and bash:
Examine the environment for clues:
When a WAL file is located:
Examine file headers:
377f0682 (hex) or specific WAL header signatureAnalyze binary structure:
xxd or hexdump for initial inspectionDetect encryption or corruption:
Attempt recovery methods in order of likelihood:
Search for decryption keys:
Try common encryption schemes:
Test multiple key formats:
Attempt SQLite recovery tools:
sqlite3 .recover command.dump to extract what's possibleundark or sqlite-recoverManual page reconstruction:
Partial recovery:
strings commandWhen tools show a file that bash cannot access:
Investigate the access method:
Check for special filesystems:
Examine tool capabilities:
Verify recovered data makes sense:
Cross-reference with database:
Test data integrity:
PRAGMA integrity_checkWrong: Conclude file doesn't exist after a few bash commands fail Right: Investigate why built-in tools showed different results; the discrepancy is a clue
Wrong: Try only single-byte XOR and conclude file isn't encrypted Right: Test multiple encryption schemes, key lengths, and formats systematically
Wrong: Notice alphabetical pattern and generate next items in sequence Right: Recovery means extracting actual data; if data cannot be extracted, acknowledge failure
Wrong: Treat WAL as opaque binary blob Right: Parse according to documented SQLite WAL format to identify frames and pages
Wrong: Focus only on the database files Right: Search entire environment for keys, configuration, related files
If standard recovery fails, verify completion of:
Only after completing this checklist should recovery be considered impossible.
Reference documentation for detailed technical specifications:
references/wal_format.md - SQLite WAL file format specification and structure