M Thesis Aigc Revision

• thesis source draft
• AIGC report or other flagged-segment report if available
• project evidence such as repo docs, implemented pages, screenshots, module names, or proposal constraints

Rewrite Rules

• Prefer concrete nouns over abstract bundles. Name the actual page, module layer, runtime role, or interaction path when the thesis already established them.
• Replace broad evaluative claims with bounded observations. Use "from the current implementation," "in the present deployment form," or similar scope markers when needed.
• Break up overly balanced triple summaries. If three sentences all follow the same rhythm, merge one, split one, and anchor one in a concrete object.
• Avoid code-level trivia unless the thesis is explicitly discussing implementation internals. Keep the description at the system or module level.
• Preserve academic tone. The result should read like a careful undergraduate engineering thesis, not like marketing copy or casual speech.
• When revising English abstracts, keep the same factual scope as the Chinese version instead of translating old generic wording literally.

Guardrails

• Do not use this skill to hide fabricated data, fake references, or non-existent features.
• Do not rewrite away a real mismatch between the thesis and the implementation. Flag it and narrow the claim instead.
• Do not inflate RBAC-style implementations into ABAC or other stronger claims without evidence.
• Do not add quantitative results that were never measured.
• Do not turn every paragraph into short punchy sentences. Rhythm variation is useful only when it still reads like formal academic prose.

References

• references/revision-patterns.md
  • common high-risk signals, rewrite moves, and section-specific heuristics

Scripts

• scripts/extract_report_segments.py
  • extract the suspicious-segment summary table from a report HTML and print the high-risk segment list

Exit Criteria

Before finishing a revision task with this skill, confirm:

• the flagged segments were mapped to the real source paragraphs
• the revised paragraphs are more specific and less template-like
• unsupported claims were narrowed instead of hidden
• terminology remains consistent across the chapter
• the revision preserves factual accuracy