Error Debugging Multi Agent Review

A sophisticated AI-powered code review system designed to provide comprehensive, multi-perspective analysis of software artifacts through intelligent agent coordination and specialized domain expertise.

Context and Purpose

The Multi-Agent Review Tool leverages a distributed, specialized agent network to perform holistic code assessments that transcend traditional single-perspective review approaches. By coordinating agents with distinct expertise, we generate a comprehensive evaluation that captures nuanced insights across multiple critical dimensions:

• Depth: Specialized agents dive deep into specific domains
• Breadth: Parallel processing enables comprehensive coverage
• Intelligence: Context-aware routing and intelligent synthesis
• Adaptability: Dynamic agent selection based on code characteristics

Tool Arguments and Configuration

Input Parameters

• $ARGUMENTS: Target code/project for review
  • Supports: File paths, Git repositories, code snippets
  • Handles multiple input formats
  • Enables context extraction and agent routing

Agent Types

1. Code Quality Reviewers
2. Security Auditors
3. Architecture Specialists
4. Performance Analysts
5. Compliance Validators
6. Best Practices Experts

Multi-Agent Coordination Strategy

1. Agent Selection and Routing Logic

• Dynamic Agent Matching:
  • Analyze input characteristics
  • Select most appropriate agent types
  • Configure specialized sub-agents dynamically
• Expertise Routing:

  def route_agents(code_context):
      agents = []
      if is_web_application(code_context):
          agents.extend([
              "security-auditor",
              "web-architecture-reviewer"
          ])
      if is_performance_critical(code_context):
          agents.append("performance-analyst")
      return agents
  

2. Context Management and State Passing

• Contextual Intelligence:
  • Maintain shared context across agent interactions
  • Pass refined insights between agents
  • Support incremental review refinement
• Context Propagation Model:

  class ReviewContext:
      def __init__(self, target, metadata):
          self.target = target
          self.metadata = metadata
          self.agent_insights = {}
  
      def update_insights(self, agent_type, insights):
          self.agent_insights[agent_type] = insights
  

3. Parallel vs Sequential Execution

• Hybrid Execution Strategy:
  • Parallel execution for independent reviews
  • Sequential processing for dependent insights
  • Intelligent timeout and fallback mechanisms
• Execution Flow:

  def execute_review(review_context):
      # Parallel independent agents
      parallel_agents = [
          "code-quality-reviewer",
          "security-auditor"
      ]
  
      # Sequential dependent agents
      sequential_agents = [
          "architecture-reviewer",
          "performance-optimizer"
      ]
  

4. Result Aggregation and Synthesis

• Intelligent Consolidation:
  • Merge insights from multiple agents
  • Resolve conflicting recommendations
  • Generate unified, prioritized report
• Synthesis Algorithm:

  def synthesize_review_insights(agent_results):
      consolidated_report = {
          "critical_issues": [],
          "important_issues": [],
          "improvement_suggestions": []
      }
      # Intelligent merging logic
      return consolidated_report
  

5. Conflict Resolution Mechanism

• Smart Conflict Handling:
  • Detect contradictory agent recommendations
  • Apply weighted scoring
  • Escalate complex conflicts
• Resolution Strategy:

  def resolve_conflicts(agent_insights):
      conflict_resolver = ConflictResolutionEngine()
      return conflict_resolver.process(agent_insights)
  

6. Performance Optimization

• Efficiency Techniques:
  • Minimal redundant processing
  • Cached intermediate results
  • Adaptive agent resource allocation
• Optimization Approach:

  def optimize_review_process(review_context):
      return ReviewOptimizer.allocate_resources(review_context)
  

7. Quality Validation Framework

• Comprehensive Validation:
  • Cross-agent result verification
  • Statistical confidence scoring
  • Continuous learning and improvement
• Validation Process:

  def validate_review_quality(review_results):
      quality_score = QualityScoreCalculator.compute(review_results)
      return quality_score > QUALITY_THRESHOLD
  

Example Implementations

1. Parallel Code Review Scenario

multi_agent_review(
    target="/path/to/project",
    agents=[
        {"type": "security-auditor", "weight": 0.3},
        {"type": "architecture-reviewer", "weight": 0.3},
        {"type": "performance-analyst", "weight": 0.2}
    ]
)

2. Sequential Workflow

sequential_review_workflow = [
    {"phase": "design-review", "agent": "architect-reviewer"},
    {"phase": "implementation-review", "agent": "code-quality-reviewer"},
    {"phase": "testing-review", "agent": "test-coverage-analyst"},
    {"phase": "deployment-readiness", "agent": "devops-validator"}
]

3. Hybrid Orchestration

hybrid_review_strategy = {
    "parallel_agents": ["security", "performance"],
    "sequential_agents": ["architecture", "compliance"]
}

Reference Implementations

1. Web Application Security Review
2. Microservices Architecture Validation

Best Practices and Considerations

• Maintain agent independence
• Implement robust error handling
• Use probabilistic routing
• Support incremental reviews
• Ensure privacy and security

Extensibility

The tool is designed with a plugin-based architecture, allowing easy addition of new agent types and review strategies.

Invocation

Target for review: $ARGUMENTS

Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.