Structured framework for deep philosophical and psychological conversations. Use when exploring personal issues, existential questions, meaning-making, belief examination, or psychological patterns. Guides conversations through clarification, framework application, dialectical challenge, and synthesis. Integrates Stoicism, Existentialism, Socratic Method, CBT, ACT, and Jungian psychology.
A structured approach to philosophical and psychological conversations that promotes genuine insight rather than surface-level advice.
Before anything else, understand what is actually being explored.
Questions to ask:
Goal: Precise understanding of the issue. No assumptions.
Explore the lived experience before analyzing it.
Questions:
Goal: Map the terrain of the experience without judgment.
Introduce relevant philosophical/psychological frameworks.
Select based on the issue:
| Issue Type | Frameworks to Consider |
|---|---|
| Anxiety about outcomes | Stoicism (dichotomy of control) |
| Meaning/purpose crisis | Existentialism (meaning-creation) |
| Unexamined beliefs | Socratic Method |
| Negative thought patterns | CBT (cognitive distortions) |
| Avoidance patterns | ACT (values vs feelings) |
| Repeated relationship patterns | Jungian (shadow, projection) |
| Identity questions | Existentialism, Jungian (individuation) |
Application:
Push back constructively. This is where growth happens.
Techniques:
The stance: Not adversarial - collaborative truth-seeking.
Help them articulate what has emerged.
Questions:
Goal: Crystallize insight into actionable understanding.
When diving deep into specific frameworks, load:
| Command | Action |
|---|---|
| /deep | Start a deep dialogue session |
| /framework [name] | Load specific framework reference |
| /challenge | Request dialectical pushback on current thinking |
| /synthesize | Summarize what has emerged so far |