Detect and neutralize PUA (Pick-Up Artist / Psychological Manipulation) tactics in conversations. Identifies guilt-tripping, gaslighting, false urgency, moving goalposts, and other manipulation patterns. Helps users recognize when they're being manipulated and provides counter-responses.
Protect users from psychological manipulation tactics commonly known as PUA (Pick-Up Artist techniques, now broadly applied to workplace, sales, and personal contexts).
This skill:
Detects manipulation patterns in incoming messages
Names the specific tactic being used
Provides counter-responses and boundary-setting language
When to Activate
Activation conditions:
User receives a message that feels "off" but can't articulate why
Request to analyze if something is manipulative
User feels guilty, anxious, or pressured after a conversation
"Is this person manipulating me?"
"How do I respond to this?"
Common PUA/Manipulation Tactics
1. Guilt-Tripping
相关技能
Pattern: Making you feel bad for having boundaries or needs.
Examples:
"After everything I've done for you..."
"I guess I'm just not important to you"
"Fine, I'll just handle it myself (sigh)"
Detection signals:
Implies you owe them
Makes your reasonable choice seem selfish
Uses martyrdom language
Counter-response:
"I understand you're disappointed. My decision stands.
I'm happy to discuss this when we can talk without blame."
2. Gaslighting
Pattern: Making you question your own perception of reality.
Examples:
"That never happened"
"You're being too sensitive"
"I never said that, you must have misunderstood"
"Everyone agrees with me, you're the only one who thinks this"
Detection signals:
Denies documented facts
Dismisses your emotions as invalid
Claims consensus that doesn't exist
Counter-response:
"I trust my memory/perception. We can agree to disagree,
but I won't accept that my experience didn't happen."
3. False Urgency
Pattern: Creating artificial time pressure to prevent thinking.
Examples:
"This offer expires in 24 hours"
"I need an answer right now"
"If you don't decide today, the opportunity is gone"
"Everyone else has already committed"
Detection signals:
Arbitrary deadlines
Punishment for taking time to think
FOMO (fear of missing out) triggers
Counter-response:
"I don't make decisions under pressure. If this opportunity
requires an instant answer, it's not the right opportunity for me."
4. Moving Goalposts
Pattern: Changing success criteria after you've met them.
Examples:
"Good job, but now you need to also do X"
"That's not what I meant, I meant..."
"You did A, but what about B?" (B was never mentioned)
Detection signals:
Requirements change after completion
Never quite "enough"
New conditions appear retroactively
Counter-response:
"The original agreement was X, which I've completed.
If you want to discuss additional scope, that's a separate conversation."
5. Negging / Backhanded Compliments
Pattern: Undermining confidence disguised as feedback.
Examples:
"You're pretty smart for someone without a degree"
"I'm surprised you actually got this right"
"You're not like other [group], you're actually competent"
Detection signals:
Compliment that leaves you feeling worse
Implies you're an exception to a negative rule
Subtle put-down wrapped in praise
Counter-response:
"I'm not sure how to take that. Could you clarify
what you mean?" (Forces them to own the insult or backpedal)
6. Love Bombing / Excessive Flattery
Pattern: Overwhelming positive attention to create obligation.
Examples:
Excessive gifts early in relationship
"You're the most amazing person I've ever met"
Constant praise that feels unearned
Moving relationship milestones too fast
Detection signals:
Intensity doesn't match relationship depth
Creates sense of debt
Makes you feel guilty for not reciprocating equally
Counter-response:
"I appreciate the kind words, but I prefer to let
relationships develop naturally over time."
7. Silent Treatment / Stonewalling
Pattern: Withdrawing communication as punishment.
Examples:
Ignoring messages after disagreement
"I'm fine" (clearly not fine)
Refusing to discuss issues
Cold shoulder without explanation
Detection signals:
Silence used as weapon
No clear path to resolution
You're expected to guess what's wrong
Counter-response:
"I notice you've gone quiet. I'm open to talking when you're ready.
I won't try to guess what's wrong or chase you for a response."
8. DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender)
Pattern: When confronted, flips to make you the bad guy.
Examples:
You: "You hurt me when you did X"
Them: "I can't believe you'd accuse me of that. YOU'RE the one who always..."
Detection signals:
Confrontation about their behavior → you're suddenly the problem
Never acknowledges the original issue
You end up apologizing for bringing it up
Counter-response:
"I'm not going to discuss my behavior until we address
what I originally raised. We can talk about me after."
9. Triangulation
Pattern: Bringing third parties into the conflict to gang up.
Examples:
"Everyone at work agrees you're being unreasonable"
"I talked to [mutual friend] and they think you're wrong"
"My mom thinks you should apologize"
Detection signals:
Unnamed "everyone" agrees with them
Third parties weaponized
You're isolated as the outlier
Counter-response:
"This is between you and me. If others have opinions,
they can share them directly. What do YOU think?"
10. Intermittent Reinforcement
Pattern: Unpredictable rewards to create addiction.
Examples:
Sometimes warm and loving, sometimes cold — no pattern
Occasional praise after long periods of criticism
Hot/cold behavior that keeps you guessing
Detection signals:
You're always trying to get back to the "good times"
Walking on eggshells
Relief when they're nice feels disproportionate
Counter-response:
"I need consistency in my relationships.
I can't invest in something this unpredictable."
Analysis Framework
When analyzing a potentially manipulative message:
Step 1: Identify the Feeling
What emotion does this trigger?
Guilt → Guilt-tripping
Confusion → Gaslighting
Panic → False urgency
Inadequacy → Negging
Obligation → Love bombing
Step 2: Name the Tactic
Match to patterns above. Naming it breaks its power.
Step 3: Check the Facts
Is this true? (Counter gaslighting)
Is this deadline real? (Counter false urgency)
Did the requirements actually change? (Counter moving goalposts)
Step 4: Provide Counter-Response
Give the user language to:
Set boundaries
Call out the tactic (if appropriate)
Exit the conversation
Response Templates
Boundary Setting (General)
"I hear you, and my answer is still no."
"I'm not comfortable with that, and I don't need to justify why."
"That doesn't work for me."
"I'll think about it and get back to you." (Buys time)
Calling Out (Direct)
"It sounds like you're trying to make me feel guilty for having boundaries."
"I notice you're creating urgency. I don't make decisions under pressure."
"This feels manipulative. Can we have a direct conversation instead?"
Exit Lines
"I'm going to end this conversation now. We can talk later when things are calmer."
"I don't engage with ultimatums. Let me know when you'd like to have a real discussion."
"I've said what I needed to. The conversation is over for now."
Anti-Patterns (What NOT to Do)
Don't:
❌ JADE (Justify, Argue, Defend, Explain) — manipulators use your explanations against you
❌ Engage in circular arguments — you won't "win"
❌ Try to make them understand — they understand, they disagree
❌ Match their emotional intensity — stay calm
❌ Accept blame to end the conflict — it only encourages more
Do:
✅ Name the tactic (internally or externally)
✅ Set boundaries without explaining
✅ Disengage when necessary
✅ Trust your gut feeling
✅ Seek outside perspective when confused
Response Principles
When helping users deal with manipulation:
Validate first — "Your gut feeling is right, this is manipulative"
Name the tactic — Specific label breaks the spell
Provide scripts — Exact words they can use
Don't over-explain — Manipulators don't need to understand, they need boundaries
Empower exit — Sometimes the best response is no response