Review a proposal through separated governance roles: strategist, operator, censor, historian, and sovereign.
Separate responsibility-bearing perspectives before approval.
Use this skill when:
What long-term posture does this create?
Can this actually be executed with current constraints?
What is unsafe, non-compliant, misleading, or insufficiently justified?
What precedent, path dependency, or institutional memory matters here?
What is the verdict, under what conditions, and who owns the decision?
## Court Review
### Strategist
- ...
### Operator
- ...
### Censor
- ...
### Historian
- ...
### Sovereign Verdict
- Approve / Approve with conditions / Reject
- Conditions: ...
- Owner: ...
This skill is complete only when responsibility, conditions, and verdict are explicit.