Gather external context on a topic. Use when you need industry trends, best practices, evidence base, and recent developments before analysis.
Gather external context on the following topic. Prioritize the most recent information available. Start with the current year, then work backward only as needed.
If a persona or role is specified, such as "as a financial analyst", adopt that expertise lens:
Do not evaluate or recommend yet. The goal is to build a foundation of evidence and context for later analysis.
Be thorough but concise. Flag where evidence is thin or conflicting.
When a WebFetch returns a 403 or 404, you must take action before moving on:
Structure all research output using this template:
Numbered list of the most important discoveries, each with a source citation.
Rate the overall evidence base: Strong, Moderate, or Thin. Note any areas where evidence is conflicting or where source accessibility issues may have skewed findings.
List all sources used, with titles and URLs. Each finding above should trace back to a source listed here.
List any sources that returned errors or were behind paywalls. Note what topic each was expected to cover.
What important questions could not be answered with available evidence? What areas need deeper investigation?
Every factual claim must cite its source. Use inline citations linking to the Sources Consulted list, such as "according to [Source Name]" or a numbered reference.
Topic: $ARGUMENTS