Analyzing Property Valuations

Workflow

1. Confirm scope and property type

   • Identify whether the subject is stabilized, lease-up, value-add, or development
   • Determine which approaches apply (income approach is primary for investment property; cost approach is most relevant for special-use or new construction; sales comparison anchors all three)

2. Income capitalization approach

   • Build a pro forma starting from the rent roll; mark each lease to market where warranted
   • Deduct vacancy and credit loss using submarket benchmarks [VERIFY local vacancy norms]
   • Apply operating expenses line-by-line; compare expense ratios to IREM or BOMA benchmarks for the asset class
   • Calculate Net Operating Income (NOI)
   • Direct capitalization: divide stabilized NOI by a market-derived cap rate; document cap rate source and adjustment rationale
   • Discounted Cash Flow (DCF): project cash flows over a 5–10 year hold period, apply a terminal cap rate to year-of-sale NOI, and discount at an appropriate yield rate; state assumptions for rent growth, expense growth, capex reserves, and leasing costs

3. Sales comparison approach

   • Select comps closed within 12–24 months; adjust for property rights conveyed, financing terms, conditions of sale, market conditions (time), location, physical characteristics, and income characteristics
   • Express value on a per-SF, per-unit, or per-key basis depending on asset type
   • Grid adjustments and note which comps bracket the subject

4. Cost approach (when applicable)

   • Estimate land value via comparable land sales
   • Calculate replacement cost new using Marshall & Swift, RSMeans, or contractor bids [VERIFY cost source]
   • Deduct physical deterioration (age-life or observed-condition method), functional obsolescence, and external obsolescence
   • Sum depreciated improvement value and land value

5. Reconcile the three approaches

   • Weight each approach based on data quality and relevance to the property type (e.g., income approach dominates for stabilized multifamily; cost approach may anchor value for owner-occupied industrial)
   • State the reconciled value or value range and the effective date
   • If reviewing a third-party appraisal, flag material deviations from your independent analysis

6. Sensitivity and scenario analysis

   • Stress-test key assumptions: cap rate ±25–50 bps, vacancy ±200–500 bps, rent growth scenarios
   • For DCF, show IRR and equity multiple under base, upside, and downside cases
   • Identify which variable has the greatest impact on value

Output

• Valuation summary table: concluded value under each approach, weighting, and reconciled value
• Key assumptions schedule: cap rate, discount rate, terminal cap rate, vacancy, rent growth, expense growth, capex reserves
• Comparable sales grid: comp details, adjustments, adjusted price per unit of comparison
• Pro forma / DCF model: annual cash flows, terminal value, NPV, IRR, equity multiple (if DCF is used)
• Sensitivity matrix: value outcomes across cap rate and NOI scenarios
• Narrative discussion: rationale for approach weighting, data limitations, and items requiring further diligence

Quality Checks

• NOI ties back to the rent roll and operating statements; no unexplained line items
• Cap rate is sourced and falls within the range of comparable transaction-implied cap rates
• DCF discount rate and terminal cap rate are internally consistent (terminal cap ≥ going-in cap for stable or declining markets)
• Comparable sales adjustments are directionally correct and individually supportable
• Cost approach depreciation does not exceed economic life benchmarks for the improvement type
• All market data citations include source, date, and geographic scope
• Items that depend on local zoning, tax assessment, or regulatory rules are marked [VERIFY]
• Reconciled value falls within a defensible range established by the individual approaches; outlier conclusions are explained