Apply Hegelian dialectics (thesis-antithesis-synthesis) to analyze contradictions and generate higher-order understanding. Use this skill when the user needs to resolve opposing viewpoints, find creative synthesis between conflicting positions, or move past binary thinking — even if they say 'both sides have valid points', 'how do we reconcile these views', or 'is there a third option'.
Dialectics is a method of reasoning through contradictions. Instead of choosing between opposing positions (thesis vs antithesis), it seeks a synthesis that transcends both — preserving what's valid in each while resolving the contradiction at a higher level.
IRON LAW: Synthesis ≠ Compromise
Synthesis is NOT "meeting in the middle." It's a NEW position that resolves
the contradiction by reframing the problem at a higher level of abstraction.
Compromise: "Let's do half of A and half of B"
Synthesis: "The contradiction between A and B reveals that C is the real answer"
# Dialectical Analysis: {Topic}
## Thesis
{Position A — steelmanned}
- What it gets right: ...
- Where it fails: ...
## Antithesis
{Position B — steelmanned}
- What it gets right: ...
- Where it fails: ...
## The Contradiction
{What specific tension exists between these positions}
## Synthesis
{Higher-order position that resolves the contradiction}
- Preserves from thesis: ...
- Preserves from antithesis: ...
- Transcends by: ...
Scenario: "Should companies prioritize shareholder value or stakeholder value?"
references/marxist-dialectics.md