Automatically detect DOCX track-changes history, version rounds, and author feedback to generate a Markdown modification explanation file when you run it on one or more DOCX versions.
Grouping rule: for the same topic series, only one Markdown file is generated:
<topic>-change-log.md
Output location: the generated Markdown is saved in the same directory as the DOCX file(s).
Implementation Details
Entry script: script/docx_feedback_tracker.py
Topic grouping and version-round ordering:
Files are grouped by the same base topic name.
Unmarked versions are treated as v0.
Version suffixes supported:
-vN (e.g., report-v2.docx)
-N (e.g., report-2.docx) — only applied when a same-name base exists.
If suffix-based ordering cannot be determined, files are sorted by file timestamp.
Track changes and comments parsing:
Extract OOXML change nodes from:
document.xml
comments.xml
Primary markers:
w:ins for inserted content
w:del for deleted content
Diff fallback when no track changes exist:
Perform text diffs between versions to compute added/deleted content.
Changes from diffs are not attributable to specific authors.
Before diffing, text is normalized to reduce false positives:
remove link tags
merge/normalize whitespace
Output generation:
Produce a Markdown "modification explanation" and merge all rounds into a single file per topic series.
Template reference: assets/change-log-template.md
OOXML reference for tracked changes:
references/docx-tracked-changes.md
When Not to Use
Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing.
Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions.
Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow.
Required Inputs
A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope.
All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution.
Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable.
Recommended Workflow
Validate the request against the skill boundary and confirm all required inputs are present.
Select the documented execution path and prefer the simplest supported command or procedure.
Produce the expected output using the documented file format, schema, or narrative structure.
Run a final validation pass for completeness, consistency, and safety before returning the result.
Output Contract
Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting.
If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as docx_feedback_tracker_result.md unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.
Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations.
Validation and Safety Rules
Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing.
Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material.
Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result.
Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times.
Failure Handling
If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required.
If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step.
If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed.
Quick Validation
Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:
No local script validation step is required for this skill.
Expected output format:
Result file: docx_feedback_tracker_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any