Use when the user wants to identify open research gaps, unresolved questions, or methodological blind spots across a literature corpus.
Analyzes a team's literature base to identify what has NOT been studied, contested, or resolved. Surfaces research gaps, contradictions left unaddressed, and methodological blind spots — helping teams identify novel contributions before writing.
gaps = gap_detection.analyze(
topic="self-supervised learning for genomics",
corpus=review.get_papers(),
include_future_work_sections=True
)
gap_detection.validate_novelty(
claim="We are the first to apply contrastive learning to single-cell RNA-seq",
search_depth="comprehensive"
)
gap_detection.gap_map(
topic="federated learning in clinical settings",
format="structured_markdown",
audience="paper_reviewer"
)
Returns categorized gap list with: gap description, supporting evidence (paper excerpts), estimated research effort, and a novelty confidence score. Optionally formatted as a gap map table.
claim_auditor for novelty-risk checksrelated_work_scout when positioning the contribution against nearby prior workcontradiction-detection to find gaps created by conflicting findings