Paper Summary

Arxiv papers

• Fetch abstract from arxiv.org/abs/ page (cleaner than PDF extraction)
• Fetch full text from the PDF
• Extract author list, title, date from the abs page

Blog posts (Medium, etc.)

• Use web_fetch to retrieve the page
• Extract article body, author, date, title
• Ignore navigation, ads, comments

Output Template

Write the output file following this EXACT structure:

# [Full Title]

## Metadata
- **Authors**: [Full author list, comma-separated]
- **Year**: [YYYY]
- **Source**: [Journal / Conference / Blog name / "arxiv preprint"]
- **URL/DOI**: [Primary link]
- **BibTeX Key**: [firstauthorYYYY_shorttitle]

## BibTeX Entry
\```bibtex
@article{firstauthorYYYY_shorttitle,
  author = {Last, First and Last, First and ...},
  title = {Full Title Here},
  year = {YYYY},
  journal = {Venue},
  url = {https://...},
  eprint = {XXXX.XXXXX},           % arxiv only
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},          % arxiv only
  primaryClass = {cs.XX}            % arxiv only
}
\```

Use `@inproceedings` for conferences, `@article` for journals, `@misc` for arxiv preprints and blog posts.

## Abstract / TL;DR
[2-4 sentences: what the paper does, why it matters, main result]

## Key Ideas
1. **[Idea name]**: [1-2 sentence explanation]
2. **[Idea name]**: [1-2 sentence explanation]
...
[3-8 ideas]

## Methodology
[1-2 paragraphs: approach, architecture, experimental setup. Focus on what distinguishes this work.]

## Key Results
- [Result with specific numbers: "achieves 85.3 BLEU on WMT14 EN-DE"]
- [Result 2]
...

## Notable Quotes & Citable Passages

Extract 5-15 of the most important exact quotes. These are used downstream for citation matching and similarity scoring, so ACCURACY IS CRITICAL.

> "[EXACT quote from the paper, word for word]"
> — Section [X], Page [Y]

> "[Another exact quote]"
> — Section [X], Page [Y]

Selection criteria for quotes:
- Core claims and contributions
- Definitions of key terms
- Results statements with numbers
- Methodological descriptions
- Limitations acknowledged by authors
- Comparisons to prior work

## Paraphraseable Claims

5-20 key claims rewritten in neutral academic language. Each includes the original for similarity comparison.

1. **Claim**: [Your neutral paraphrase of the claim]
   **Original**: "[Exact text from paper]" — Section [X], Page [Y]
   **Context**: [When you'd cite this — e.g., "when discussing attention mechanisms"]
   **Key terms**: [distinctive terms for search matching]

2. **Claim**: [Paraphrase]
   **Original**: "[Exact text]" — Section [X], Page [Y]
   **Context**: [Usage context]
   **Key terms**: [terms]

## Definitions & Terminology
- **[Term]**: [Definition as used in this paper] — Section [X]
...

## Connections
- **Builds on**: [Key prior work this paper extends]
- **Compared against**: [Baselines and competitors]
- **Related to**: [Other papers on same topic, if known]
- **Extended by**: [Notable follow-up work, if known]

## Tags
`[tag1]` `[tag2]` `[tag3]` ...

Use lowercase, hyphenated tags: `transformer`, `self-attention`, `language-model`, `knowledge-graph`, `retrieval-augmented-generation`, `fine-tuning`, `benchmark`, `computer-vision`, `graph-neural-network`, etc.

Quality Requirements

• Quotes must be exact: Copy word-for-word from the source. Do not paraphrase in the quotes section. These are used for plagiarism-level similarity matching downstream.
• Page/section numbers: Include wherever identifiable. For arxiv papers, section numbers are more reliable than page numbers.
• BibTeX must be valid: Test mentally that the entry has all required fields for its type.
• Tags should be specific: Use retrieval-augmented-generation not just nlp. Aim for 4-8 tags per paper.
• Key terms in claims: These help the citation-scan skill find matches quickly. Use distinctive multi-word phrases from the paper.