Manufacturing Readiness Review

Rules

• think like an industrial designer: prioritize assembly clarity, service access, hose and clamp usability, intentional placement of user-facing parts, and a package that is easy for a vendor to understand without guesswork
• for interlocking prototype kits, prefer hidden mirrored witness letters and light PLA detents over exposed face labels or glue-only plain joints
• require consistent part naming, quantities, materials, dimensions, and status statements across package docs and exported files
• treat scattered multi-part prototype print exports or support-heavy orientations as package drift when a tighter support-light layout is available
• treat preview SVGs as reference-only support sheets unless a formal drawing package exists separately
• do not call a final hybrid wet-part package release-ready until the real-hose plug test freezes the OD and a formal 2D manufacturing drawing or PDF exists
• keep PCBWay ambiguity-reduction guidance above convenience; if orientation, ownership, or assembly order could be misread, add explicit notes, drawings, or marked images
• prefer the smallest coherent set of file edits needed to restore package alignment