Multi-agent review with parallel specialized reviewers and severity classification
Perform thorough code review by spawning specialized reviewers in parallel, consolidating findings with severity classification (P0/P1/P2/P3), and gating completion on implementation-reviewer approval.
pnpm test && pnpm lintbd show <epic>) for EARS requirements -- reviewers verify each requirement is metnpx ca search for known patterns and recurring issuesteam_name.claude/skills/compound/agents/{security-reviewer,architecture-reviewer,performance-reviewer,test-coverage-reviewer,simplicity-reviewer}/SKILL.md.claude/skills/compound/agents/{security-injection,security-secrets,security-auth,security-data,security-deps}/SKILL.mdSendMessageAskUserQuestion when severity is ambiguous or fix has multiple valid optionsbd create --title="P1: ..."/implementation-reviewer as mandatory gatenpx ca learn; pattern-matcher auto-reinforces recurring issuesnpx ca search before review for known recurring issuesnpx ca learnnpx ca learn with type=solutiondocs/compound/research/code-review/ for systematic review methodology, severity taxonomies, and evidence-based review practicesnpx ca knowledge "code review methodology" for indexed knowledge on review techniquesnpx ca search "review" for lessons from past review cyclespnpm test, lint)/implementation-reviewer approval/implementation-reviewer approved as mandatory gateBefore starting Compound, verify review is complete:
/implementation-reviewer must have returned APPROVEDCRITICAL: Use npx ca learn for ALL lesson storage -- NOT MEMORY.md.