Brand Voice

If no existing content, skip to Step 2.

Present findings: "Based on your existing content, your voice currently scores roughly: [dimensions]. Here's what I noticed..."

Step 2: Choose Mode

Guided mode (voice.status is "not_started"): Walk through each framework interactively.

Fast mode (user has clear voice preferences or voice.status is "needs_refresh"): Propose voice profile from available data, present for validation.

Step 3: Score NN/g Four Dimensions

For each dimension, explain the spectrum and help the user place their brand:

Dimension 1: Funny ↔ Serious (-3 to +3)

• "Should your brand make people smile, or should it convey gravity?"
• Reference the brand's archetype and audience expectations
• SaaS B2B typically lands +1 to +2 (serious), B2C consumer can be -1 to -2 (funny)

Dimension 2: Formal ↔ Casual (-3 to +3)

• "Would you say 'We are pleased to announce' or 'Hey, check this out'?"
• Reference the positioning market category and audience

Dimension 3: Respectful ↔ Irreverent (-3 to +3)

• "Do you defer to conventions, or do you challenge them?"
• Outlaw/Jester archetypes lean irreverent, Caregiver/Innocent lean respectful

Dimension 4: Enthusiastic ↔ Matter-of-fact (-3 to +3)

• "Do you use exclamation points, or let facts speak for themselves?"
• Content creators often lean enthusiastic, enterprise tools lean matter-of-fact

For each dimension, provide concrete examples at the user's chosen score AND at scores they're explicitly NOT.

Step 4: Select Brand Personality (Aaker)

Present the five dimensions:

1. Sincerity - Down-to-earth, honest, wholesome, cheerful
2. Excitement - Daring, spirited, imaginative, up-to-date
3. Competence - Reliable, intelligent, successful
4. Sophistication - Upper-class, charming, glamorous
5. Ruggedness - Outdoorsy, tough, athletic

Ask the user to choose ONE primary and optionally ONE secondary. Having more than two dilutes personality.

Connect to positioning: "Given your positioning as [category] for [customers], I'd suggest [personality] because [reason]. Does that resonate?"

Step 5: Select Archetype (Jung)

Present the 12 archetypes with their brand examples and voice tendencies. Recommend one based on the personality dimensions and positioning.

The archetype becomes the CHARACTER behind the voice. "If your brand were a person at a dinner party, they'd be the [archetype]: the one who [characteristic behavior]."

Step 6: Build Vocabulary Lists

"Use" words

Draw from:

• The positioning's unique attributes and value language
• The BrandScript's hero/guide/transformation language
• Words that embody the chosen personality and archetype
• Industry-specific terms the audience uses naturally

"Avoid" words

Include:

• All anti-slop banned generics (innovative, cutting-edge, seamless, etc.)
• Words that contradict the voice dimensions
• Jargon the audience wouldn't use
• Competitor-associated terms

Specific guidance

• If formal (-2 to -3): avoid contractions, slang, sentence fragments
• If casual (+2 to +3): use contractions, allow fragments, first-person
• If serious (+2 to +3): no jokes, puns, or memes
• If irreverent (+2 to +3): challenge assumptions, use unexpected language

Step 7: Create Example Pairs (THE CORE DELIVERABLE)

This is the most valuable voice artifact. Writers reference examples more than rules.

For each common content type, write:

1. On-brand version at the chosen voice settings
2. Off-brand version showing what to avoid (too formal/casual/serious/enthusiastic/etc.)
3. Why it's wrong for the off-brand version

Content types to cover:

• Homepage headline
• Product/service description
• Error message or apology
• Email subject line
• Social media post
• CTA button text
• Customer support response
• About page opening

Example format:

Homepage headline

On-brand: "Stop fighting your tools. Start shipping your ideas." Off-brand (too corporate): "Our platform empowers teams to achieve operational excellence through streamlined workflows." Why wrong: Fails swap test (any SaaS could say this), uses "empowers" and "operational excellence" (banned generics), positions brand as hero instead of guide.

Step 8: Define "Sounds Like / Not Like"

Create reference anchors:

• Sounds like: 2-3 reference voices (real people, brands, or archetypes). "A smart friend who happens to be an expert in [field]"
• Does NOT sound like: 2-3 anti-references. "A corporate press release" or "A hype-driven startup pitch deck"

Step 9: Anti-Slop Review

Run the voice output through:

1. Voice contrast test: Are there explicit "NOT" statements? (Required: at least 3)
2. Swap test: Could another brand in the same space use this exact voice profile?
3. Business-type test: Is this voice specific to this brand's context?
4. Example quality: Do on-brand examples FEEL different from off-brand examples?

Step 10: Write to Brand Brief

Update brand-brief.md:

• Set all voice fields (dimensions, personality, archetype, vocabulary, examples, sounds_like, not_like)
• Update voice.status
• Update stage if needed (move to "voice" if was "messaging")
• Update last_updated
• Append to Decision Log

Step 11: Recommend Next Step

Voice status: [status]

Recommended next step: brand-visual-identity, to translate your voice and positioning into a visual system. Alternative: Apply this voice to existing content by running brand-audit to compare current copy against these guidelines.