Triz Asymmetry

The Process

Step 1: Identify the Symmetry Constraint

What is currently symmetrical, and what performance is being sacrificed?

Example: Circular O-rings provide even sealing but may not account for non-uniform pressure distribution.

Step 2: Determine Which Axis to Break

• Lateral Asymmetry: Left-right differences (ergonomic tools)
• Radial Asymmetry: Around-center differences (fan blades)
• Axial Asymmetry: Along-length differences (tapered designs)
• Surface Asymmetry: Different sides/faces (heat shields)

Example: Change O-ring from circular to oval cross-section for directional pressure.

Step 3: Optimize Each Asymmetric Element

Design each side or surface for its specific operating condition.

Example: Asymmetric fan blades - each blade at slightly different angle reduces harmonic resonance.

Step 4: Verify System Balance and Stability

Ensure asymmetry doesn't introduce unacceptable vibration, wear, or stress.

Step 5: Test Against Symmetrical Baseline

Measure improvement in target metric against original symmetric design.

Example Application

Situation (Shinkansen Bullet Train): High-speed trains created loud sonic booms when exiting tunnels, disturbing communities.

Application:

1. Symmetry Constraint: Blunt, symmetrical nose created abrupt pressure wave at tunnel exit
2. Axis: Axial asymmetry - vary cross-section along length
3. Optimization: Biomimicry from kingfisher beak - long, asymmetric tapering nose
4. Balance: Maintained center of gravity and structural integrity
5. Result: Eliminated sonic boom, improved aerodynamics, reduced energy consumption 15%

Outcome: Asymmetric nose design solved noise problem while improving efficiency.

Example Application (Consumer Product)

Situation (Logitech TrackMan): Generic symmetric mice cause repetitive strain in right-handed users.

Application:

1. Constraint: Symmetric mouse forces unnatural wrist position for dominant hand
2. Axis: Lateral asymmetry - shaped specifically for right hand contour
3. Optimization: Buttons, scroll, trackball positioned for right-thumb operation
4. Balance: Acknowledged limiting left-handed market (separate left-hand model)
5. Result: Reduced RSI complaints, improved precision for target users

Outcome: Purpose-designed asymmetric form factor improved ergonomics and user satisfaction.

Example Application (Architecture)

Situation (Guggenheim Bilbao): Standard rectangular museum buildings feel institutional and fail to attract visitors.

Application:

1. Constraint: Symmetric boxes are efficient but unremarkable
2. Axis: Full three-dimensional asymmetry - curves, angles, volumes
3. Optimization: Each gallery space custom-shaped for art display requirements
4. Balance: Maintained structural integrity through innovative titanium cladding
5. Result: Iconic building became destination, revitalized city's economy

Outcome: Asymmetric design transformed functional building into cultural landmark.

Anti-Patterns

• Breaking symmetry where balance is critical (rotating equipment, precision instruments)
• Introducing asymmetry that creates resonance or vibration problems
• Asymmetry purely for aesthetics without functional benefit
• Creating asymmetric designs that increase manufacturing complexity disproportionately
• Ignoring maintenance implications (asymmetric parts are not interchangeable)
• Forgetting that asymmetry excludes some users (left-handed people, etc.)

Related

• triz-segmentation (divide before optimizing asymmetric parts)
• triz-curvature (change straight to curved - related transformation)
• biomimicry (nature's asymmetric optimizations)
• ergonomic-design (human-centered asymmetry)
• design-of-everyday-things (affordances from shape asymmetry)