Vendor evaluation and selection framework — RFP/RFI design, scoring matrices, TCO analysis, contract risk. Use when the user asks to "evaluate vendors", "design RFP", "compare platforms", "assess TCO", or mentions vendor selection, build-vs-buy, technology evaluation, procurement strategy.
Vendor assessment provides structured evaluation of technology vendors and platforms. The skill produces vendor scorecards, comparison matrices, and recommendation reports that support objective, defensible procurement decisions.
The user provides a vendor evaluation context as $ARGUMENTS. Parse $1 as the evaluation name/context.
Parameters:
{MODO}: (default) | | | piloto-autodesatendidosupervisadopaso-a-paso{FORMATO}: markdown (default) | html | dual{VARIANTE}: ejecutiva (~40%) | tecnica (full, default){TIPO_EVALUACION}: rfp | build-vs-buy | platform-selection | auto (default)graph TD
subgraph Core["Vendor Assessment"]
A[Evaluation Framework] --> B[Scoring Matrix]
A --> C[TCO Analysis]
A --> D[Risk Assessment]
end
subgraph Inputs["Inputs"]
E[Evaluation Context] --> A
F[Requirements] --> B
G[Vendor Responses] --> B
end
subgraph Outputs["Outputs"]
A --> H[Vendor Scorecard]
B --> I[Matriz Comparacion]
C --> J[Analisis TCO]
D --> K[Informe Recomendacion]
end
subgraph Related["Related Skills"]
L[software-architecture] -.-> F
M[integration-architecture] -.-> F
N[security-architecture] -.-> D
end
strategy_vendor-assessment_{contexto}_{WIP}.mdstrategy_vendor-scorecard_{contexto}_{WIP}.xlsxstrategy_vendor-assessment_{contexto}_{WIP}.html{fase}_{entregable}_{cliente}_{WIP}.docx{fase}_{entregable}_{cliente}_{WIP}.pptx| Dimension | Peso | Criterio |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger Accuracy | 10% | Activa ante "vendor evaluation", "RFP", "build-vs-buy", "TCO" sin confundir con procurement operacional o contract management |
| Completeness | 25% | Cubre criterios, scoring, TCO, riesgo y recomendacion sin huecos |
| Clarity | 20% | Cada vendor tiene score numerico con evidencia; recomendacion es defendible |
| Robustness | 20% | Maneja vendor unico, informacion asimetrica, build-vs-buy y re-evaluacion |
| Efficiency | 10% | 8 pasos donde criterios alimentan scoring que alimenta recomendacion |
| Value Density | 15% | Scorecard y TCO son directamente presentables en comite de decision |
Umbral minimo: 7/10 en cada dimension para considerar el skill production-ready.
Autor: Javier Montaño · Comunidad MetodologIA | Version: 1.0.0