Execute complex research tasks by spawning multiple subagents simultaneously, then synthesize converging insights for higher quality results. Ideal for emerging tech, market analysis, and multi-domain investigations.
Execute complex research by spawning multiple subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings for deeper insights and cross-validation.
Before spawning subagents, ALWAYS ask user for confirmation:
"I'll use the parallel-research skill to investigate [TOPIC] by spawning [N] subagents simultaneously. This will take ~4-6 minutes. Proceed?"
Why: Subagent spawning consumes API resources and requires user awareness of parallel execution.
Create a clear research brief with:
Spawn 2-3 subagents with identical or complementary prompts:
sessions_spawn:
task: "Research [TOPIC] focusing on [ANGLE].
Key questions:
1. [Question 1]
2. [Question 2]
Provide specific data, cite sources, avoid hype."
label: "Research-[ANGLE]"
thinking: "high"
Example angles for emerging tech:
Review all outputs for:
Present executive summary with:
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Multiple Perspectives | Reduces blind spots from single viewpoint |
| Cross-Validation | Converging findings = higher confidence |
| Speed | Parallel execution faster than sequential deep dives |
| Built-in Fact-Checking | Independent verification catches errors |
| Intersection Discovery | Novel insights emerge from synthesis |
Prompt (all 3 subagents):
Research [DOMAIN] deeply. Focus on:
1. Market size and growth drivers
2. Existing players (what's working/failing)
3. Technical architecture
4. Legal/regulatory considerations
5. Real use cases (not hype)
6. Opportunities for builders
Provide specific data, cite sources. Save full report to workspace.
Results:
Outcome: 10x better insight than single-agent research.
Research [TOPIC] comprehensively. Cover:
- What is it? (clear definition)
- Market opportunity (size, growth, timing)
- Technical feasibility (what's possible now vs future)
- Existing solutions (who's building, what's working/failing)
- Challenges and risks
- Opportunities for [user context]
Be thorough. Use web_search, web_fetch. Cite sources.
Save full report to: research/[topic]-[timestamp].md
Subagent 1 (Market):
Research [TOPIC] from MARKET perspective:
- TAM/SAM/SOM analysis
- Competition mapping
- Growth drivers and timing
- Investment/funding landscape
- Go-to-market strategies
Subagent 2 (Technical):
Research [TOPIC] from TECHNICAL perspective:
- Current state of the art
- Architecture patterns
- Implementation complexity
- Performance benchmarks
- Integration challenges
Subagent 3 (Legal/Regulatory):
Research [TOPIC] from LEGAL perspective:
- Regulatory status by jurisdiction
- Compliance requirements
- Liability frameworks
- Intellectual property considerations
- Emerging legislation
Recommended tools for research subagents:
web_search - Current information, market dataweb_fetch - Deep dive into specific sourcesread - Analyze existing workspace fileswrite - Save findings to structured reportsNOT recommended:
sessions_spawn (avoid recursion)browser (unless specific site analysis needed)Subagents should save structured reports:
# [Topic] Research Report
## Executive Summary
2-3 sentences on key findings
## 1. [Section]
Detailed findings with data and citations
## 2. [Section]
...
## Sources
- [Title](URL) - Key insight
- [Title](URL) - Key insight
## Confidence Assessment
- High confidence: [findings with multiple sources]
- Medium confidence: [findings with limited sources]
- Speculative: [emerging trends, projections]
After reviewing all subagent outputs:
## Research Synthesis: [Topic]
### 🎯 Key Findings
What converged across all agents (highest confidence)
### 📊 Market Opportunity
Size, timing, positioning
### 🔧 Technical Reality
What's possible today vs 2-3 years
### 💡 Opportunities
Specific, actionable paths forward
### ⚠️ Challenges
Known blockers and risks
### 📄 Full Reports
- [Report 1](path)
- [Report 2](path)
- [Report 3](path)
For time-sensitive research:
For critical decisions:
For exploring domain convergence:
❌ Vague prompts → Agents wander, low-quality output
✅ Specific questions → Focused, actionable findings
❌ Too many agents → Diminishing returns, coordination overhead
✅ 2-3 agents optimal → Good coverage, manageable synthesis
❌ Ignoring divergence → Miss important nuances
✅ Highlight disagreements → Indicates uncertainty or opportunity
After using this skill:
.learnings/LEARNINGS.mdAGENTS.mdUser: "Research Voice NFTs and AI Agent Payments"
Action:
1. Spawn subagent: "Research Voice NFTs" → 4 min
2. Spawn subagent: "Research AI Agent Payments" → 4 min
3. Spawn subagent: "Research voice authorization" → 4 min
4. All complete simultaneously
5. Synthesize convergence findings
6. Identify intersection opportunity
Result: Voice NFT signatures for AI payment authorization
Version: 1.0.0
Last Updated: 2026-02-17
Tested On: Voice NFTs, AI Agent Payments, Voice Authorization research