MBA thesis advisor for improving academic papers to award-winning quality. Use when a user wants to: (1) upgrade an MBA thesis to top-tier quality (e.g., Tsinghua excellent graduation thesis), (2) diagnose problems with an existing thesis draft, (3) rewrite thesis sections with critical analysis ("writing style B"), (4) build a strong theoretical framework, (5) identify and articulate the original contribution (novelty) of a thesis, or (6) revise conclusions to be insightful and non-trivial. Handles LaTeX-based theses (thuthesis template preferred) and Chinese MBA thesis conventions. Trigger phrases: "帮我改论文", "MBA论文", "优秀毕业论文", "thesis improvement", "论文诊断", "帮同学改论文".
This skill guides you through diagnosing, restructuring, and elevating an MBA thesis from a passing draft to award-winning quality. It is based on proven techniques for Tsinghua MBA theses but applies broadly to any Chinese or international MBA program.
Most MBA thesis drafts use Writing Style A: describe a company's problem → apply standard frameworks (SWOT, PEST, Porter's Five Forces) → propose generic recommendations. This produces forgettable, low-scoring work.
Writing Style B (critical-analytical) is what separates excellent theses:
Three markers of Style B:
Read every .tex file in the mydata/ directory (or equivalent), including:
chap01.tex through chap05.tex, abstract.tex
For each chapter, assess:
Rate the draft on five dimensions:
| Dimension | Question | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution | What does this paper say that no one has said before? | "Any MBA textbook covers this" |
| Insider access | Does the author leverage their unique position? | All evidence is publicly available |
| Theory fit | Does the framework match the research question? | SWOT used as the primary lens |
| Data quality | Are claims supported by specific numbers? | Qualitative description only |
| Conclusion rigor | Are conclusions falsifiable and bounded? | "Company should improve X" |
Ask the author five questions to unlock their insider perspective. See
references/diagnostic-questions.md for the full question set.
The answers to these questions are the raw material for the entire rewrite. Do not proceed to Phase 2 without them.
Replace or supplement generic MBA frameworks with higher-level academic theory:
| Research Context | Recommended Framework |
|---|---|
| Organizational change / R&D management | Dynamic Capabilities (Teece 2007) |
| Cross-cultural / institutional environment | Institutional Isomorphism (DiMaggio & Powell 1983) |
| Strategy execution failure | Principal-Agent Theory + Path Dependency |
| Technology adoption | Absorptive Capacity (Cohen & Levinthal 1990) |
| Team / org design | Team Topologies + Conway's Law |
| VUCA / uncertainty | VUCA framework + Scenario Planning |
| Supply chain / platform | Resource-Based View (Barney 1991) |
Rule: PEST and Porter's Five Forces are acceptable as context-setting tools in Chapter 2–3, but must NOT be the primary analytical lens in Chapter 4.
Create a framework diagram (Figure in Chapter 2 or Chapter 1) that shows:
This diagram becomes the "backbone" referenced throughout the thesis.
From the insider angle (Phase 1, Step 1.3), identify a mechanism: a causal chain that explains WHY something happens, not just that it happens.
Template:
"[Company/industry] faces [problem]. Conventional wisdom says [X]. But our analysis shows the real mechanism is [Y]: when [condition], [cause] leads to [effect] because [mechanism]. This matters because [implication]."
Give the original contribution a memorable name or label. Examples:
A named concept is citable, memorable, and signals academic seriousness.
In the thesis conclusion chapter, add a dedicated subsection:
\subsection{理论贡献}
本文的主要理论贡献包括:
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{概念提出:}...(原创概念名称)...
\item \textbf{机制识别:}...(因果机制)...
\item \textbf{框架整合:}...(理论整合方式)...
\end{enumerate}
This chapter must carry the weight of the thesis. Checklist:
Replace generic recommendations with:
Avoid these phrases in conclusions:
Add 3–5 foundational papers for the chosen theoretical framework (Step 2.1). Structure: existing theory → gap → how this paper fills the gap.
For Chinese internet/tech companies: annual reports (IR pages), WIND, Bloomberg For industrial/agriculture companies: CNKI industry reports, company IR pages, China customs data (海关总署), Ministry of Agriculture data
Each major claim in Chapter 4 needs at least ONE of:
Minimum recommended figures for a strong thesis:
Use Python + matplotlib/seaborn for charts. Save as both PDF (for LaTeX) and PNG.
Before finalizing, verify:
\ref{} and captioned\caption{} and footnotes for data sourcesThesis root file: typically my-thesis.tex
Chapter files: mydata/chap01.tex through mydata/chap05.tex
Figures: place in myfigure/ or figures/; reference with relative path
Build command:
cd <thesis-root>
latexmk -xelatex my-thesis.tex
Git workflow: commit only source files; ignore build artifacts.
Standard .gitignore entries: *.pdf, *.log, *.aux, *.synctex.gz, *.bbl, *.blg
Do NOT ignore: myfigure/*.py, myfigure/*.png, mydata/*.tex, refs.bib, abstract.tex
See references/ directory for:
diagnostic-questions.md — Five questions to unlock the author's insider perspectiveframework-selection.md — Guide to choosing the right theoretical frameworkstyle-b-examples.md — Before/after examples of Style A → Style B rewrites