Use when integrating categories into a coherent grounded theory — connecting core category to related categories through theoretical coding.
Integration means your categories hang together as an explanatory whole: readers can see what is going on, how it is handled, under what conditions, and with what results. Integration is earned through memoing, sorting, and theoretical coding—not through imposing a prefabricated model.
You move from a list of themes to a substantive theory with plausible relationships among categories. The core category should organize the story without flattening complexity.
Glaser’s coding families (e.g., causes, contexts, strategies, consequences, stages) help you ask relationship questions:
Apply families as heuristic prompts, not a mandatory checklist.
Write concise statements of relationship:
Each proposition should be supportable with multiple incidents and resilient against known negative cases—or qualified where exceptions persist.
A GT storyline typically includes:
Draft the story in plain language first; refine concepts second.
Print or list memos; sort into piles that represent sections of the theory. Rename piles until the outline matches the data. CAQDAS “maps” can substitute if they mirror the same discipline.
Create diagrams only after relational claims stabilize enough to be falsified by comparison. Iterate visuals alongside prose (see visual-modeling).
Ask:
Return to theoretical sampling if gaps are empirical.
Coherent integration:
Open with the core story; present a model or proposition set; support with excerpts; discuss limits and modifiability.