生成专业的法律结构可视化图，输出为自包含 HTML 文件（内嵌 SVG，浅色主题，适合打印和嵌入文档）。适用场景：(1) 用户要求"画结构图""生成可视化""做流程图""法律图示"时；(2) 涉及诉讼推理结构（当事人→证据→事实→法律→判决）；(3) 合同关系图（甲乙方权利义务、履约节点、违约责任）；(4) 法规程序图（申请→审查→决定→救济）；(5) 证据链图、请求权基础分析图、法律体系层级图。Use when the user asks for litigation flow diagrams, contract relationship diagrams, legal reasoning structure diagrams, evidence chain diagrams, or any legal visualization.
Create professional legal structure diagrams as self-contained HTML files with inline SVG. Designed for court document analysis, contract review, legal knowledge management, and client presentations. Output is light-themed and print-ready.
Use these semantic colors for legal component types:
| Component Type | Fill (rgba) | Stroke | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 当事人/主体 (Party) | rgba(219,234,254,0.9) | #2563eb (blue-600) | 原告、被告、甲方、乙方、第三人 |
| 事实/行为 (Fact) | rgba(241,245,249,0.9) | #475569 (slate-600) | 侵权行为、违约事实、案件经过 |
| 证据 (Evidence) | rgba(254,243,199,0.9) | #b45309 (amber-700) | 书证、物证、证人证言、鉴定意见 |
| 法律规范 (Law) | rgba(209,250,229,0.9) | #047857 (emerald-700) | 法条、司法解释、行政法规 |
| 程序节点 (Procedure) | rgba(237,233,254,0.9) | #6d28d9 (violet-700) | 立案、开庭、举证、质证、裁定 |
| 裁判/结论 (Judgment) | rgba(254,226,226,0.9) | #b91c1c (red-700) | 判决主文、责任认定、风险结论 |
| 争议焦点 (Issue) | rgba(255,237,213,0.9) | #c2410c (orange-700) | 争议焦点、待查明事实 |
Use Inter for all text — clean, professional, print-friendly:
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@400;500;600;700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
Font sizes: 12px for primary labels, 10px for secondary, 9px for annotations, 8px for tiny labels.
Background: #f8fafc with subtle light grid:
<pattern id="grid" width="40" height="40" patternUnits="userSpaceOnUse">
<path d="M 40 0 L 0 0 0 40" fill="none" stroke="#f1f5f9" stroke-width="0.8"/>
</pattern>
Component boxes: Rounded rectangles (rx="6") with 1.5px stroke.
Always draw an opaque white background rect FIRST to mask arrows behind boxes:
<rect x="X" y="Y" width="W" height="H" rx="6" fill="white"/>
<rect x="X" y="Y" width="W" height="H" rx="6" fill="rgba(219,234,254,0.9)" stroke="#2563eb" stroke-width="1.5"/>
Arrows — standard flow:
<marker id="arr" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="6" refX="7" refY="3" orient="auto">
<polygon points="0 0, 8 3, 0 6" fill="#94a3b8"/>
</marker>
<line x1="..." y1="..." x2="..." y2="..." stroke="#94a3b8" stroke-width="1.2" marker-end="url(#arr)"/>
Arrows — judgment emphasis (red):
<marker id="arr-red" markerWidth="8" markerHeight="6" refX="7" refY="3" orient="auto">
<polygon points="0 0, 8 3, 0 6" fill="#b91c1c"/>
</marker>
Cross-layer or indirect logical connections: Use dashed lines:
stroke-dasharray="4,3"
Arrow z-order: ALWAYS draw all arrows BEFORE component boxes in the SVG. SVG renders in document order, so arrows drawn first appear behind boxes drawn later.
Choose the layout based on content type:
1. 诉讼流程图 (Litigation Flow) — top-to-bottom layered with group boxes
For: case analysis, judgment structure, evidence → fact → law → judgment chain.
PREFERRED PATTERN — dashed group boxes + single vertical arrows:
Each reasoning stage is enclosed in a dashed group box with a badge label straddling its top-left border. Stages connect via a single purely vertical arrow in the center (x=500 for a 1000-wide viewBox). No node-to-node arrows across stages — this avoids visual clutter and false logical implications.
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ [当事人] 原告 ●●● 被告 │ ← group box, dashed border
└─────────────────────────────────┘
↓ (single arrow at center x)
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ [争议焦点] 焦点一 焦点二 │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
↓
... etc through 证据 → 事实认定 → 法律适用 → 判决结果
Group box SVG pattern (badge label straddles top-left border):
<!-- Group box -->
<rect x="8" y="127" width="984" height="82" rx="8"
fill="rgba(255,237,213,0.12)" stroke="#fb923c"
stroke-width="1.2" stroke-dasharray="6,4"/>
<!-- Badge: rect behind text, centered on top border (y = group top - 8) -->
<rect x="14" y="119" width="64" height="16" rx="4"
fill="rgba(255,237,213,0.95)" stroke="#fb923c" stroke-width="0.8"/>
<text x="46" y="131" fill="#9a3412" font-size="9" font-weight="600"
text-anchor="middle" font-family="Inter,system-ui">争议焦点</text>
Vertical gap between group boxes: 28–32px. Place one arrow per gap:
<line x1="500" y1="[group_bottom+2]" x2="500" y2="[next_group_top-2]"
stroke="#64748b" stroke-width="1.5" marker-end="url(#arr)"/>
<!-- Final arrow to judgment box uses red: stroke="#b91c1c" stroke-width="2" marker-end="url(#arr-red)" -->
Within each group box, items are arranged horizontally (no intra-group arrows needed — spatial proximity implies relationship). Reserve arrows for cross-group logical flow only.
2. 合同关系图 (Contract Relationship) — hub-and-spoke or two-column For: contract parties, rights/obligations flow, key clause mapping
甲方 ←→ 合同核心义务 ←→ 乙方
↓
履约条件/违约责任
3. 法律体系图 (Legal Framework) — tree or hierarchical For: legal concepts, regulatory hierarchy, claim basis analysis (请求权基础)
上位法 → 下位法 → 实施细则/司法解释
CRITICAL: Avoid element overlaps:
Row width calculation:
totalRowWidth = N * boxWidth + (N-1) * gap
startX = (viewBoxWidth - totalRowWidth) / 2
Place legend BELOW all diagram content, at least 20px below the lowest element. Use a light rounded-rectangle background. Arrange legend items horizontally.
Always produce a single self-contained .html file:
#f8fafc) — suitable for printing and embedding in Word/PPTFile should open and render correctly in any modern browser, and look professional when printed.