Review existing architecture. Produces a report with findings, risks, quality attribute assessment (ISO 25010), and actionable recommendations.
# Architecture Review: <Project Name>
## Executive Summary
<2–3 sentences: overall health, biggest risks, key recommendations.>
## Current Architecture
<Brief description of the architecture: style, major components, data stores, integrations.>
## Quality Attribute Assessment
| Attribute | Rating | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Maintainability | 🟢🟡🔴 | <key findings> |
| Reliability | 🟢🟡🔴 | <key findings> |
| Performance | 🟢🟡🔴 | <key findings> |
| Security | 🟢🟡🔴 | <key findings> |
| Scalability | 🟢🟡🔴 | <key findings> |
| Testability | 🟢🟡🔴 | <key findings> |
## Findings
### Critical
- **<Finding title>**: <description, evidence, impact>
### High
- **<Finding title>**: <description, evidence, impact>
### Medium
- **<Finding title>**: <description, evidence, impact>
### Low
- **<Finding title>**: <description, evidence, impact>
## Technical Debt Summary
| Category | Items | Interest Level |
|---|---|---|
| Code debt | <count> | High/Medium/Low |
| Design debt | <count> | High/Medium/Low |
| Architecture debt | <count> | High/Medium/Low |
| Test debt | <count> | High/Medium/Low |
| Dependency debt | <count> | High/Medium/Low |
## Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Severity | Effort | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <actionable recommendation> | Critical/High/Medium | S/M/L | <expected improvement> |
| 2 | <actionable recommendation> | High | S/M/L | <expected improvement> |
## Risks
- <Risk that needs monitoring or mitigation>
## References
- <Links to ADRs, docs, tools used for analysis>