Execution cost estimation, slippage curve modeling, and optimal trade sizing based on AMM liquidity depth
Estimate execution costs, model slippage curves from AMM mechanics and empirical quotes, and determine optimal trade sizes that keep costs within acceptable thresholds.
Slippage is the difference between the expected price at the time you decide to trade and the actual execution price you receive. On decentralized exchanges, slippage is deterministic and measurable — unlike CEX slippage, which depends on hidden order book dynamics.
Example: You expect to buy a token at 0.001 SOL. Your trade executes at 0.00105 SOL. That 5% difference is slippage — it directly reduces your profit and increases your break-even threshold.
Automated market makers use bonding curves that move price as liquidity is consumed. On a constant-product AMM (x * y = k):
price_impact = Δx / (x + Δx)
Where x is the reserve of the input token and Δx is your trade size. A 1 SOL trade against a pool with 100 SOL reserves produces ~1% price impact. Against 10 SOL reserves, it produces ~10%.
See references/slippage_math.md for full derivations and CLMM adjustments.
Every swap incurs a fee taken from the trade:
| DEX | Fee | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raydium | 0.25% | Standard AMM pools |
| Orca | 0.30% | Whirlpool concentrated pools |
| Meteora | 0.1–2.0% | Dynamic fees based on volatility |
| PumpFun | 1.0% | Bonding curve phase |
Solana validators prioritize transactions with higher compute unit prices. During congestion or for time-sensitive trades:
Searchers detect pending swaps and sandwich them — buying before your trade (raising the price) and selling after (capturing the difference). MEV cost depends on:
Typical MEV cost: 0–200 bps on vulnerable trades.
Between receiving a quote and landing the transaction on-chain (0.4–2 seconds on Solana), the price may move. Volatile tokens can shift 50–500 bps in that window.
For a pool with reserves (x, y) and invariant k = x * y:
Buying tokens with SOL (input Δx SOL):
tokens_received = y * Δx / (x + Δx)
effective_price = Δx / tokens_received = (x + Δx) / y
spot_price = x / y
price_impact = effective_price / spot_price - 1 = Δx / (x + Δx)
Selling tokens for SOL (input Δy tokens):
sol_received = x * Δy / (y + Δy)
effective_price = sol_received / Δy = x / (y + Δy)
spot_price = x / y
price_impact = 1 - effective_price / spot_price = Δy / (y + Δy)
Key insight: Slippage scales with trade_size / (reserves + trade_size). This is approximately linear for small trades and accelerates sharply as trade size approaches reserve size.
| Trade / Reserve Ratio | Approximate Slippage |
|---|---|
| 0.1% | 0.1% (1 bp) |
| 1% | 1.0% (100 bps) |
| 5% | 4.8% (476 bps) |
| 10% | 9.1% (909 bps) |
| 25% | 20% (2000 bps) |
| 50% | 33% (3333 bps) |
Concentrated Liquidity Market Makers (Orca Whirlpools, Meteora DLMM) concentrate liquidity in specific price ranges:
clmm_slippage ≈ cp_slippage / concentration_factorTypical concentration factors: 5–50x for well-managed positions.
Theoretical formulas assume single-pool routing. In practice, Jupiter aggregates across multiple pools and routes. Empirical measurement is more accurate:
/quote at multiple trade sizes (0.01, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50 SOL)slippage_bps = a * trade_size^bThis captures real routing behavior, multi-pool splitting, and available liquidity.
See scripts/slippage_curve.py for the full implementation.
total_cost_bps = price_impact_bps + fee_bps + priority_fee_bps + mev_risk_bps
total_cost_sol = trade_size_sol * total_cost_bps / 10_000
See references/cost_model.md for component breakdowns and worked examples.
For a roundtrip (buy + sell):
roundtrip_cost_bps = entry_impact + exit_impact + 2 * fee_bps + 2 * priority_bps + mev_bps
The token must move more than roundtrip_cost_bps in your favor to be profitable. For a token with 200 bps entry slippage, 200 bps exit slippage, and 50 bps fees:
roundtrip = 200 + 200 + 50 = 450 bps = 4.5%
You need at least a 4.5% price move just to break even.
See scripts/execution_cost.py for automated cost estimation.
Given a slippage curve s(q) = a * q^b, solve for max trade size:
q_max = (threshold_bps / a) ^ (1/b)
For large orders, splitting reduces total slippage because each tranche faces a partially-reset order book (on CLMMs) or allows arbitrageurs to rebalance between tranches:
n_tranches = ceil(total_size / q_max)
tranche_size = total_size / n_tranches
wait_between = 2-10 seconds (allow arb rebalancing)
Time-Weighted Average Price execution:
| Category | Typical Pool TVL | Slippage for 1 SOL | Slippage for 10 SOL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue chip | >$10M | <5 bps | <20 bps |
| Mid-cap | $100K–$10M | 10–50 bps | 50–500 bps |
| Small-cap | $10K–$100K | 50–200 bps | 500–2000 bps |
| Micro/PumpFun | <$10K | 200–2000 bps | Often impossible |
| File | Description |
|---|---|
references/slippage_math.md | AMM slippage derivations, CLMM adjustments, multi-pool routing math |
references/cost_model.md | Total execution cost components, break-even analysis, cost comparison tables |
| File | Description |
|---|---|
scripts/slippage_curve.py | Build empirical slippage curves from Jupiter quotes, fit power-law model |
scripts/execution_cost.py | Estimate total execution cost and break-even for a specific trade |