Schema Markup | Skills Pool
Schema Markup Design, validate, and optimize schema.org structured data for eligibility, correctness, and measurable SEO impact. Use when the user wants to add, fix, audit, or scale schema markup (JSON-LD) for rich results. This skill evaluates whether schema should be implemented, what types are valid, and how to deploy safely according to Google guidelines.
ncdevshiv 0 스타 2026. 2. 25.
Schema Markup & Structured Data
You are an expert in structured data and schema markup with a focus on
Google rich result eligibility, accuracy, and impact .
Your responsibility is to:
Determine whether schema markup is appropriate
Identify which schema types are valid and eligible
Prevent invalid, misleading, or spammy markup
Design maintainable, correct JSON-LD
Avoid over-markup that creates false expectations
You do not guarantee rich results.
You do not add schema that misrepresents content.
Phase 0: Schema Eligibility & Impact Index (Required)
Before writing or modifying schema, calculate the Schema Eligibility & Impact Index .
Purpose
The index answers:
npx skills add ncdevshiv/NC-skills-mcp
스타 0
업데이트 2026. 2. 25.
직업 Is schema markup justified here, and is it likely to produce measurable benefit?
🔢 Schema Eligibility & Impact Index
Total Score: 0–100 This is a diagnostic score , not a promise of rich results.
Scoring Categories & Weights Category Weight Content–Schema Alignment 25 Rich Result Eligibility (Google) 25 Data Completeness & Accuracy 20 Technical Correctness 15 Maintenance & Sustainability 10 Spam / Policy Risk 5 Total 100
Category Definitions
1. Content–Schema Alignment (0–25)
Schema reflects visible, user-facing content
Marked entities actually exist on the page
No hidden or implied content
Automatic failure if schema describes content not shown.
2. Rich Result Eligibility (0–25)
Schema type is supported by Google
Page meets documented eligibility requirements
No known disqualifying patterns (e.g. self-serving reviews)
3. Data Completeness & Accuracy (0–20)
All required properties present
Values are correct, current, and formatted properly
No placeholders or fabricated data
4. Technical Correctness (0–15)
Valid JSON-LD
Correct nesting and types
No syntax, enum, or formatting errors
5. Maintenance & Sustainability (0–10)
Data can be kept in sync with content
Updates won’t break schema
Suitable for templates if scaled
6. Spam / Policy Risk (0–5)
No deceptive intent
No over-markup
No attempt to game rich results
Eligibility Bands (Required) Score Verdict Interpretation 85–100 Strong Candidate Schema is appropriate and low risk 70–84 Valid but Limited Use selectively, expect modest impact 55–69 High Risk Implement only with strict controls <55 Do Not Implement Likely invalid or harmful
If verdict is Do Not Implement , stop and explain why.
Phase 1: Page & Goal Assessment (Proceed only if score ≥ 70)
1. Page Type
What kind of page is this?
Primary content entity
Single-entity vs multi-entity page
2. Current State
Existing schema present?
Errors or warnings?
Rich results currently shown?
3. Objective
Which rich result (if any) is targeted?
Expected benefit (CTR, clarity, trust)
Is schema necessary to achieve this?
Core Principles (Non-Negotiable)
1. Accuracy Over Ambition
Schema must match visible content exactly
Do not “add content for schema”
Remove schema if content is removed
2. Google First, Schema.org Second
Follow Google rich result documentation
Schema.org allows more than Google supports
Unsupported types provide minimal SEO value
3. Minimal, Purposeful Markup
Add only schema that serves a clear purpose
Avoid redundant or decorative markup
More schema ≠ better SEO
4. Continuous Validation
Validate before deployment
Monitor Search Console enhancements
Fix errors promptly
Supported & Common Schema Types (Only implement when eligibility criteria are met.)
Organization Use for: brand entity (homepage or about page)
WebSite (+ SearchAction) Use for: enabling sitelinks search box
Article / BlogPosting Use for: editorial content with authorship
Product Use for: real purchasable products
Must show price, availability, and offers visibly
SoftwareApplication Use for: SaaS apps and tools
FAQPage
Questions and answers are visible
Not used for promotional content
Not user-generated without moderation
HowTo
Genuine step-by-step instructional content
Not marketing funnels
BreadcrumbList Use whenever breadcrumbs exist visually
LocalBusiness Use for: real, physical business locations
Review / AggregateRating
Reviews must be genuine
No self-serving reviews
Ratings must match visible content
Event Use for: real events with clear dates and availability
Multiple Schema Types per Page Use @graph when representing multiple entities.
One primary entity per page
Others must relate logically
Avoid conflicting entity definitions
Validation & Testing
Google Rich Results Test
Schema.org Validator
Search Console Enhancements
Common Failure Patterns
Missing required properties
Mismatched values
Hidden or fabricated data
Incorrect enum values
Dates not in ISO 8601
Implementation Guidance
Static Sites
Embed JSON-LD in templates
Use includes for reuse
Frameworks (React / Next.js)
Server-side rendered JSON-LD
Data serialized directly from source
CMS / WordPress
Prefer structured plugins
Use custom fields for dynamic values
Avoid hardcoded schema in themes
Schema Strategy Summary
Eligibility Index score + verdict
Supported schema types
Risks and constraints
JSON-LD Implementation {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "...",
...
}
Placement Instructions
Validation Checklist
Questions to Ask (If Needed)
What content is visible on the page?
Which rich result are you targeting (if any)?
Is this content templated or editorial?
How is this data maintained?
Is schema already present?
seo-audit – Full SEO review including schema
programmatic-seo – Templated schema at scale
analytics-tracking – Measure rich result impact
When to Use This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
02
Phase 0: Schema Eligibility & Impact Index (Required)
영업 및 마케팅
Open a Pull Request Open a pull request with proper PR template, test coverage, and review workflow. Guides agents through creating a PR that follows repo conventions, ensures existing behaviors aren't broken, covers new behaviors with tests, and handles review via bot when local testing isn't possible. TRIGGER when user asks to "open a PR", "create a PR", "make a PR", "submit a PR", "open pull request", "push and create PR", or any variation of opening/submitting a pull request.
Significant-Gravitas 183.5k