1031 Pipeline Manager

Do NOT activate for:

• Pre-sale planning and exchange structure selection before the relinquished property is under contract (use 1031-exchange-executor)
• General tax planning not specific to an active exchange timeline
• Exchange qualification analysis on whether a property qualifies as like-kind (use 1031-exchange-executor)
• Post-exchange tax filing and Form 8824 preparation (use 1031-exchange-executor)
• Funds flow coordination at closing of the replacement property (use funds-flow-calculator)

Interrogation Protocol

Ask these questions before building the pipeline tracker if not already answered in context:

1. Relinquished property close date: "When did you close on the relinquished property (or when do you expect to)? This sets Day 0 for all deadlines. If you have not yet closed, the clock has not started -- but pre-planning is critical."
2. Net exchange value: "What is the net exchange value? This is the sale price of the relinquished property minus debt payoff, selling costs, and closing costs. The QI should be holding this amount. Confirm the exact dollar amount the QI is holding."
3. Relinquished debt retired: "How much debt was retired at closing of the relinquished property? This sets the minimum debt you must take on the replacement to avoid mortgage boot."
4. Replacement candidates identified: "How many replacement properties have you identified so far? Have you submitted a formal identification letter to the QI, or are you still searching?"
5. Exchange type: "Are you pursuing a forward exchange (sold first, buying replacement), a reverse exchange (bought replacement, selling relinquished), or an improvement/build-to-suit exchange?"
6. QI information: "What is your QI's name and contact? Are exchange funds held in a segregated, FDIC-insured account? Do you have a copy of the exchange agreement?"
7. DST consideration: "Have you identified any Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) options as a backup in case your primary candidates fall through?"
8. State tax exposure: "What state was the relinquished property in, and what state(s) are you targeting for replacement? Some states (CA, MA, OR) have clawback or non-conformity rules."

Input Schema

Branching Logic

By Exchange Type

Forward exchange (most common)

• Relinquished property sold first; QI holds proceeds
• 45-day identification clock starts at close of relinquished
• 180-day acquisition clock runs concurrently from same Day 0
• Full pipeline management: search, identify, negotiate, diligence, close
• QI wires exchange proceeds to title at replacement closing

Reverse exchange

• Replacement property acquired before relinquished property sells
• Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (EAT) takes title to replacement (or relinquished)
• Parking arrangement: EAT holds property for up to 180 days
• Cost premium: $15,000-$50,000 in EAT fees + legal costs (1-3% of property value)
• 45-day identification still applies: must identify the relinquished property to be sold
• Higher risk: if relinquished does not sell within 180 days, exchange fails entirely
• Requires lender comfort with EAT structure (some lenders will not lend to an EAT)

Improvement / build-to-suit exchange

• Replacement property is acquired and improved within the 180-day window
• Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (EAT) takes title and manages improvements
• All improvements must be completed and property conveyed back to exchanger by Day 180
• Most complex: construction timeline must fit within exchange window
• Risk: construction delays push past Day 180 -- no extensions
• Budget: exchange value must be spent on property + improvements to avoid cash boot
• Title passes from EAT to exchanger only when improvements are complete (or Day 180)

By Property Count

Single replacement property

• Simplest pipeline: one property to identify, diligence, and close
• 3-property rule is trivially satisfied
• Risk concentrated: if this deal falls through, must pivot fast before Day 45 or Day 180
• Recommended: always have at least one backup identified even if one target is strong

Multiple replacement properties (2-3 under 3-property rule)

• Most common strategy: primary target + backup + safety option
• Rank candidates by exchange suitability, not just investment quality
• Track each candidate's timeline independently -- staggered closings are fine
• Can close on any or all within the 180-day window
• Total acquisition value must equal or exceed relinquished sale price to avoid boot

Multiple replacement properties (4+ under 200% rule)

• Total fair market value of all identified properties cannot exceed 200% of relinquished sale price
• Example: $5M relinquished -> can identify up to $10M total across all candidates
• More optionality but adds complexity: must track FMV of each candidate
• Recalculate 200% limit every time a candidate is added or removed (before Day 45)

By Timeline Pressure

Early stage (Days 1-20)

• Broad search phase: cast a wide net, tour candidates, request offering materials
• No urgency to narrow yet, but begin scoring candidates
• Engage financing early: pre-qualification on 2-3 candidates if possible
• If reverse exchange: EAT should already be in place and holding title

Mid-stage (Days 21-35)

• Narrowing phase: reduce candidate list to 3-5 serious options
• Request financials, inspect properties, get preliminary title reports
• Begin drafting identification letter with primary and backup properties
• Engage legal counsel for PSA review on leading candidate(s)
• If no strong candidates by Day 30: begin DST research as fallback

Late stage (Days 36-44)

• Urgency phase: finalize identification list
• Day 40: identification letter should be substantially drafted
• Day 43: send identification letter to QI (2-day buffer for delivery confirmation)
• Day 44: absolute last day to get letter into QI's hands with confirmed receipt
• If no candidates: DST identification is mandatory as fallback
• Do NOT wait until Day 45 -- mail delays, delivery failures, and QI office hours create risk

Post-identification (Days 46-180)

• Execution phase: negotiate PSA, complete due diligence, secure financing, close
• Can only acquire properties that were formally identified
• If primary candidate falls through: pivot to identified backup
• If all identified candidates fall through and none were DSTs: exchange fails
• Day 160+: if closing is not imminent, escalate immediately

Process

Workflow 1: Timeline Calculator

Build the complete exchange calendar from Day 0 (close of relinquished property). Every date is computed, not estimated. Business day adjustments are applied where relevant.

See references/1031-timeline-calculator.md for day-by-day milestones, deadline extensions for presidentially declared disasters, and state-specific considerations.

Timeline construction:

INPUT: relinquished_close_date (Day 0)

CRITICAL DEADLINES:
  Day 0:   Relinquished property closes. QI receives net proceeds.
           Clock starts. This date is immovable.
  Day 45:  Identification deadline. Written identification must be
           RECEIVED by QI before midnight (local time of exchanger).
           Falls on weekend/holiday: NO extension. Deadline stands.
  Day 180: Acquisition deadline. Replacement property must be acquired
           (title transferred) by this date. No extension.
           Exception: if Day 180 falls after the exchanger's tax return
           due date (including extensions), the earlier date controls.

CALENDAR GENERATION:
  Day 0 date:   [computed]
  Day 45 date:  [computed: Day 0 + 45 calendar days]
  Day 180 date: [computed: Day 0 + 180 calendar days]
  Tax return due: April 15 of year following sale (or October 15 with extension)
  Controlling deadline: min(Day 180, tax return due date)

MILESTONE SCHEDULE:
  Day 0:       Close relinquished. Confirm QI has funds.
  Days 1-5:    Confirm exchange agreement executed. Verify QI account is segregated.
  Days 1-14:   Broad property search. Request offering materials.
  Days 15-25:  Tour leading candidates. Request financials and rent rolls.
  Days 25-35:  Score candidates (Workflow 3). Engage counsel for PSA review.
  Days 35-40:  Draft identification letter. Confirm delivery method with QI.
  Day 40:      Send identification letter (5-day buffer).
  Day 43:      Backup send date (2-day buffer).
  Day 45:      HARD DEADLINE. Identification must be received by QI.
  Days 46-60:  Execute PSA on primary replacement. Begin DD.
  Days 60-90:  Due diligence period. Environmental, survey, title.
  Days 90-120: Secure financing. Appraisal, lender underwriting.
  Days 120-150: Resolve DD findings. Clear title objections.
  Days 150-170: Pre-closing. Confirm loan docs. Schedule closing.
  Day 175:     Final check: is closing on track for Day 180?
  Day 180:     HARD DEADLINE. Replacement property must close.

HOLIDAY AWARENESS:
  Federal holidays in the 180-day window: [list all]
  State holidays: [list state-specific]
  Note: holidays do NOT extend the 45 or 180 day deadlines.
  Holidays affect: business days for wire transfers, recording offices,
  lender funding, QI office hours for receiving identification letters.
  If Day 45 falls on a Saturday: letter must arrive Friday or earlier.

Tax return deadline interaction:

The 180-day window is further limited by the tax return due date.
If the relinquished property closes late in the tax year:

Example:
  Relinquished closes: November 15, 2025
  Day 45: December 30, 2025
  Day 180: May 14, 2026
  Tax return due (no extension): April 15, 2026
  Tax return due (with extension): October 15, 2026

  Without filing extension: exchange must close by April 15, 2026 (Day 152)
  With filing extension: exchange closes by May 14, 2026 (Day 180)

  ALWAYS file for a tax return extension if the 180-day window
  crosses April 15. This is free and automatic and preserves the
  full 180-day window.

Output: Complete calendar with all milestone dates, Day 45 and Day 180 highlighted, current day in the exchange marked, days remaining to each deadline, holidays flagged.

Workflow 2: Identification Strategy

Determine the optimal identification rule and build the identification letter.

Identification rules comparison:

THREE-PROPERTY RULE (most common, recommended default):
  - Identify up to 3 properties of any value
  - No aggregate value limit
  - Strategy: primary target, strong backup, safety option (often a DST)
  - Advantages: simplest, most commonly used, well-understood by QIs
  - Risk: limited to 3 candidates -- if all 3 fall through, exchange fails

200% RULE:
  - Identify any number of properties
  - Total FMV of all identified properties cannot exceed 200% of relinquished value
  - Example: $5M relinquished -> max $10M total identified FMV
  - Strategy: identify 4-6 candidates with combined FMV under limit
  - Advantages: more optionality than 3-property rule
  - Risk: must accurately estimate FMV; if identified value exceeds 200%, ALL
    identifications are invalid (not just the excess)
  - Common trap: identifying too many DSTs plus direct acquisitions exceeds 200%

95% RULE:
  - Identify unlimited properties of any value
  - MUST acquire 95% of total identified FMV
  - Example: identify $20M in properties -> must close on $19M
  - EXTREMELY RISKY: effectively requires closing on virtually everything identified
  - Recommend against this rule in almost all circumstances
  - Only appropriate: institutional exchangers with contractual certainty on all candidates

Identification letter requirements:

The identification letter must:
  1. Be in writing (not verbal, not email to broker -- to QI)
  2. Be signed by the exchanger (or authorized representative)
  3. Be delivered to and RECEIVED by the QI before midnight on Day 45
  4. Unambiguously describe each replacement property:
     - Legal description OR street address
     - If unimproved land: legal description required
     - If to-be-built: description of property to be constructed
  5. Cannot be modified, amended, or revoked after Day 45

  Delivery methods (confirm with QI which they accept):
    - Certified mail, return receipt requested (arrive by Day 45)
    - Hand delivery with signed receipt
    - Fax with transmission confirmation (if QI accepts fax)
    - Email with read receipt and QI's written confirmation of receipt
    - Overnight courier (FedEx, UPS) with tracking confirmation of delivery by Day 45
    - Safest: email + overnight courier as backup

  TEMPLATE:
  ---------------------------------------------------------------
  [Date]

  [QI Name]
  [QI Address]

  Re: 1031 Exchange -- Identification of Replacement Property
  Exchanger: [Name]
  Exchange Agreement No.: [Number]
  Relinquished Property: [Address]
  Close Date of Relinquished: [Date] (Day 0)

  Pursuant to IRC Section 1031 and Treasury Regulation 1.1031(k),
  I hereby identify the following replacement propert(ies):

  1. [Address / Legal Description]
     Estimated FMV: $[amount]

  2. [Address / Legal Description]
     Estimated FMV: $[amount]

  3. [Address / Legal Description]
     Estimated FMV: $[amount]

  This identification is made under the Three-Property Rule /
  200% Rule [select one].

  [Signature]
  [Printed Name]
  [Date]
  ---------------------------------------------------------------

Optionality maximization:

Strategy to maximize optionality while maintaining compliance:

Under 3-property rule:
  Slot 1: Strongest direct acquisition candidate (highest probability of close)
  Slot 2: Second-best direct acquisition or different asset class
  Slot 3: DST fallback (available within days, certainty of close)

  The DST in slot 3 is insurance -- if slots 1 and 2 fall through,
  DST can be acquired within the 180-day window with minimal DD.

Under 200% rule:
  Calculate: 2 * relinquished_sale_price = max_total_FMV
  Allocate budget across 4-6 candidates, each under the limit
  Include at least one DST in the mix
  Leave 10% FMV headroom (do not push to exactly 200%)

Output: Identification rule selection with justification, identification letter draft, candidate slot allocation with FMV tracking, optionality analysis.

Workflow 3: Replacement Property Evaluation

Score each replacement property candidate against exchange-specific criteria. Investment quality matters, but exchange suitability is the filter -- a great property that cannot close by Day 180 is worthless for this exchange.

Scoring framework (each candidate):

EXCHANGE SUITABILITY SCORECARD

Candidate: [Address]
Asking Price: $[amount]
Property Type: [type]
Market: [MSA]

CRITERION                         WEIGHT   SCORE (1-10)   WEIGHTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Exchange Value Coverage          25%     [__]           [__]
   Does asking price >= relinquished sale price?
   Full coverage = 10. Shortfall = boot exposure, score accordingly.

2. Boot Exposure                    20%     [__]           [__]
   Cash boot: replacement value < relinquished value?
   Mortgage boot: replacement debt < relinquished debt retired?
   Zero boot = 10. Any boot > $0 = reduce proportionally.

3. Debt Replacement Adequacy        15%     [__]           [__]
   Can the exchanger obtain financing >= relinquished debt retired?
   Pre-qualified = 10. Uncertain financing = 5. Cannot finance = 1.

4. Timeline Feasibility             20%     [__]           [__]
   Can this property close before Day 180?
   Under contract, clean title, lender ready = 10.
   Not yet under contract, complex DD, construction = lower score.
   If closing requires more than (180 - current_day) days: score 0.

5. Property Quality                 10%     [__]           [__]
   Investment merit independent of exchange mechanics.
   Cap rate, NOI trend, market fundamentals, tenant quality.
   Do NOT accept a bad property just to save the exchange.

6. Closing Probability              10%     [__]           [__]
   Seller motivation, title complexity, environmental risk,
   entitlement status, tenant estoppel availability.
   High certainty = 10. Significant contingencies = lower.

TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE:              100%                    [__]/10
--------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDATION:
  Score >= 8.0: Strong candidate. Advance to PSA negotiation.
  Score 6.0-7.9: Acceptable candidate. Identify as backup.
  Score 4.0-5.9: Marginal. Identify only if no better options.
  Score < 4.0: Do not identify. Risk of exchange failure too high.

BOOT EXPOSURE DETAIL:
  Relinquished sale price:     $[amount]
  Replacement purchase price:  $[amount]
  Value gap (cash boot):       $[amount] (taxable if positive)

  Relinquished debt retired:   $[amount]
  Replacement debt to assume:  $[amount]
  Debt gap (mortgage boot):    $[amount] (taxable if positive)

  Total boot exposure:         $[amount]
  Tax on boot (est.):          $[amount] (federal capital gains + state + recapture)

Multi-candidate comparison table:

| Criterion | Candidate A | Candidate B | Candidate C (DST) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Address | 100 Main St | 500 Oak Ave | ABC DST Trust |
| Asking Price | $5,200,000 | $4,800,000 | $5,000,000 |
| Exchange Value Coverage | Full | Shortfall $200K | Full |
| Boot Exposure | $0 | $200,000 | $0 |
| Estimated Debt | $3,900,000 | $3,200,000 | N/A (all-cash DST) |
| Debt Gap (Boot) | $0 | $700,000 | $900,000 |
| Days to Close (est.) | 75 | 90 | 14 |
| Closing Probability | 85% | 70% | 99% |
| Weighted Score | 8.2 | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Recommendation | PRIMARY | DO NOT IDENTIFY | FALLBACK |

Output: Scored candidate table, rank-ordered by weighted score, with boot exposure detail for each, and recommendation for identification slot assignment.

Workflow 4: Boot Minimization

Analyze and eliminate boot exposure across all replacement candidates. Any boot is a taxable event -- the goal is $0 boot unless the exchanger has explicitly accepted a partial exchange.

See references/boot-minimization-strategies.md for worked examples, cash boot vs mortgage boot mechanics, and common traps.

Boot types and analysis:

CASH BOOT (most intuitive):
  Trigger: replacement property value < relinquished property net sale price
  Calculation: relinquished_sale_price - replacement_purchase_price = cash_boot
  Tax: boot is taxed as capital gain (up to total gain; cannot exceed actual gain)

  Example:
    Relinquished sold for: $5,000,000
    Replacement purchased for: $4,600,000
    Cash boot: $400,000 (taxable)
    Federal tax (20% LTCG): $80,000
    State tax (varies): $20,000-$50,000
    Net tax on boot: $100,000-$130,000

  Elimination strategies:
    - Increase replacement purchase price (negotiate less aggressively)
    - Acquire additional replacement property to absorb excess proceeds
    - Partial DST investment for remainder of exchange proceeds

MORTGAGE BOOT (frequently overlooked):
  Trigger: debt on replacement property < debt retired on relinquished property
  Calculation: relinquished_debt - replacement_debt = mortgage_boot
  Tax: mortgage boot is treated identically to cash boot

  Example:
    Relinquished debt retired: $3,500,000
    Replacement debt obtained: $2,800,000
    Mortgage boot: $700,000 (taxable)

  Elimination strategies:
    - Obtain larger loan on replacement property (if property supports it)
    - Add cash to offset the debt shortfall (exchanger contributes additional equity)
    - Seller carryback note on replacement property (creates debt on replacement)
    - Cross-collateralize with another property in exchanger's portfolio
    - Blanket mortgage across replacement + another owned property

COMBINED BOOT:
  Cash boot and mortgage boot are netted:
    Total boot = max(0, cash_boot) + max(0, mortgage_boot)
    But: excess cash contributed can offset mortgage boot
    Net boot = max(0, total_shortfall_across_both_dimensions)

  The netting rule:
    If replacement value > relinquished value (no cash boot)
    AND replacement debt < relinquished debt (mortgage boot)
    THEN: the excess value can offset the debt shortfall
    IF exchanger contributes additional cash equal to the debt gap

  Example (no net boot through additional equity):
    Relinquished: $5M sale, $3.5M debt, $1.5M QI proceeds
    Replacement: $5.2M purchase, $2.8M debt
    Cash boot: $0 (replacement > relinquished)
    Mortgage boot: $700,000 ($3.5M - $2.8M)
    Exchanger adds $700,000 cash to close -> total equity = $2.4M
    Net boot: $0 (additional cash offsets mortgage boot)

Boot minimization decision tree:

1. Calculate cash boot and mortgage boot independently
2. If both are $0: no boot exposure. Proceed.
3. If cash boot > $0:
   a. Can replacement price be increased? (acquire more property)
   b. Can additional replacement property absorb excess QI proceeds?
   c. Can DST absorb remainder?
   d. If none: accept partial exchange and quantify tax cost
4. If mortgage boot > $0:
   a. Can replacement loan be increased? (higher LTV, different lender)
   b. Can exchanger contribute additional cash?
   c. Seller carryback note available?
   d. Cross-collateralization possible?
   e. If none: accept partial exchange and quantify tax cost
5. Present: cost of accepting boot vs. cost of eliminating it
   (e.g., $80K tax vs. $15K cost of higher LTV or seller carryback fee)

Output: Boot exposure analysis for each candidate, elimination strategies ranked by cost and feasibility, decision recommendation with cost comparison.

Workflow 5: Reverse Exchange Mechanics

When the replacement property must be acquired before the relinquished property sells. This is the most complex and expensive exchange structure.

When to use a reverse exchange:

Scenarios that require reverse exchange:
  1. Found an exceptional replacement property but relinquished is not yet sold
  2. Relinquished property is under contract but closing is delayed
  3. Market timing: replacement opportunity will be gone before relinquished closes
  4. Portfolio rebalancing: must acquire now to maintain allocation targets

Requirements:
  - Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (EAT) -- a special-purpose entity that
    holds title to either the replacement or relinquished property during the
    parking period
  - Exchange agreement with QI (same as forward exchange)
  - Parking agreement between exchanger and EAT
  - 180-day parking limit: EAT cannot hold title for more than 180 days
  - 45-day identification: exchanger must identify relinquished property
    (or replacement property, depending on structure) within 45 days

EAT structure options:

OPTION 1: EAT parks the replacement property (most common)
  1. EAT acquires replacement property using exchanger's funds + financing
  2. Exchanger then sells relinquished property (QI holds proceeds)
  3. Within 180 days of EAT's acquisition:
     a. QI transfers exchange proceeds to EAT
     b. EAT transfers replacement property to exchanger
  4. Timeline pressure: relinquished must sell within 180 days of EAT's acquisition

OPTION 2: EAT parks the relinquished property
  1. Exchanger transfers relinquished property to EAT
  2. Exchanger acquires replacement property
  3. EAT sells the relinquished property
  4. Within 180 days: exchange is completed
  5. Less common; used when relinquished is harder to transfer

Cost analysis:

Reverse exchange cost premium over forward exchange:

EAT FEES:
  Setup fee: $5,000 - $15,000
  Monthly holding fee: $1,500 - $3,000 / month
  Typical hold: 3-6 months
  Total EAT fees: $15,000 - $50,000

LEGAL COSTS:
  Additional legal complexity: $10,000 - $25,000
  Parking agreement drafting: $3,000 - $5,000
  Lender negotiation (EAT as borrower): $5,000 - $10,000

FINANCING COSTS:
  Some lenders will not lend to EAT structures
  Bridge loan or hard money may be required (higher rate: 8-12%)
  Rate premium over conventional: 2-5%
  Loan cost premium on $5M property (6 months): $50,000 - $125,000

TOTAL COST PREMIUM: $75,000 - $200,000 (on a $5M exchange)
  Compare to: tax savings from successful exchange (often $500K+)
  Cost-benefit: usually favorable if exchange value > $2M

180-day parking limit:

CRITICAL: The EAT cannot hold title for more than 180 calendar days.

If the relinquished property does not sell within 180 days:
  - The exchange fails
  - EAT must transfer property to exchanger (or back to seller if reversible)
  - All EAT fees, legal costs, and financing costs are sunk
  - Exchanger owes capital gains tax on the relinquished sale
    (if relinquished already sold) or has an EAT-held property to unwind

Risk mitigation:
  - Before entering reverse exchange: confirm relinquished is saleable within 120 days
  - Get relinquished under contract before or simultaneously with EAT acquisition
  - Price relinquished property to sell quickly (2-5% below market)
  - Have a backup buyer identified
  - Set Day 120 as internal alarm: if relinquished not under contract, price reduction

Output: Reverse exchange feasibility analysis, EAT cost budget, parking timeline with milestones, risk assessment, go/no-go recommendation.

Workflow 6: DST Fallback Analysis

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) serve as a safety net when direct acquisition candidates are uncertain or timeline pressure is intense. DSTs should be a fallback -- not a primary strategy -- due to their illiquidity, lack of control, and fee load.

See references/dst-evaluation-framework.yaml for the full DST due diligence checklist, fee analysis template, and sponsor track record criteria.

When to invoke DST analysis:

TRIGGERS:
  - Day 30+ with no strong direct acquisition candidate
  - Primary candidate has material closing risk (title issues, environmental, seller uncertainty)
  - Exchange value exceeds available direct acquisition opportunities
  - Exchanger wants to retire from active management (passive investment is a feature, not a bug)
  - Partial DST: direct acquisition for majority, DST for remaining exchange proceeds

DO NOT DEFAULT TO DST:
  - DSTs are more expensive (fees), less liquid, and lower-returning than direct ownership
  - Only invoke when timeline pressure, available options, or exchanger preference justify it
  - Always present cost comparison: DST all-in cost vs. paying the tax

DST evaluation criteria:

DST SCORECARD

Sponsor: [Name]
Property: [Address / Description]
Offering Size: $[amount]
Minimum Investment: $[amount]
Property Type: [type]
Projected Cash Yield: [%]
Projected Total Return: [%]
Hold Period: [years]

CRITERION                           WEIGHT   SCORE (1-10)   NOTES
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Sponsor Track Record              20%     [__]
   Full-cycle track record (at least 5 completed DSTs)
   Average investor returns vs. projections
   Any defaults, foreclosures, or capital calls
   Years in business (minimum 10 preferred)

2. Property Quality                  20%     [__]
   Location, age, condition, tenant quality
   Occupancy rate and lease term remaining
   NOI trend (stable, growing, declining)

3. Fee Transparency                  15%     [__]
   Acquisition fee: typical 2-3% (excessive if > 4%)
   Asset management fee: typical 1-1.5%
   Disposition fee: typical 1-2%
   Financing fee: typical 0.5-1%
   Total load: sum of all fees over projected hold
   Compare: all-in cost to paying the tax

4. Debt Structure                    15%     [__]
   LTV ratio (typical 50-65% for DSTs)
   Fixed vs. floating rate (fixed preferred)
   Maturity vs. hold period (match required)
   Non-recourse to investors (must be)

5. Closing Timeline                  15%     [__]
   Can close within remaining exchange window?
   DSTs can typically close within 5-14 business days
   This is the primary advantage of DST fallback

6. Liquidity / Exit Path             15%     [__]
   Projected hold period (7-10 years typical)
   Secondary market for DST interests (very thin)
   Ability to 1031 out of DST at disposition (yes, if structured correctly)
   Exchanger must accept illiquidity for full hold

TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE:               100%                   [__]/10
-------------------------------------------------------------------

COST COMPARISON:
  Tax if no exchange:                    $[amount]
  DST fees over hold period (est.):      $[amount]
  Projected DST return over hold:        $[amount]
  Projected direct acquisition return:   $[amount]
  Net advantage of DST vs. paying tax:   $[amount]

Partial DST strategy:

When direct acquisition covers most but not all exchange proceeds:

Example:
  QI holds: $2,000,000
  Direct acquisition uses: $1,600,000
  Remaining proceeds: $400,000

Options:
  1. DST investment: $400,000 into DST to fully defer tax
  2. Accept $400,000 boot: pay ~$80,000-$100,000 in tax
  3. Acquire additional small property: townhome, parking lot, NNN lease

Decision factors:
  - DST fees on $400,000 over 7-10 years: ~$40,000-$60,000
  - Tax on $400,000 boot: ~$80,000-$100,000
  - If DST fees < tax: DST is cost-effective
  - If DST fees > tax: accept the boot (simpler, more liquid)

Output: DST candidate evaluation table, fee analysis, cost comparison vs. paying tax, recommendation with confidence level.

Workflow 7: QI Coordination Checklist

Manage the QI relationship and ensure all exchange documentation and fund handling meets IRS requirements.

Exchange agreement review checklist:

EXCHANGE AGREEMENT REVIEW

QI: [Name]
Agreement Date: [Date]
Exchange Number: [Number]

TERMS:
  [ ] Exchange fee: $[amount] (typical: $750-$2,500 for forward; $5,000+ for reverse)
  [ ] Interest on held funds: credited to exchanger or retained by QI?
  [ ] Account type: segregated and FDIC-insured (required)
  [ ] Commingling prohibition: funds NOT mixed with other exchangers' funds
  [ ] Investment of held funds: money market or Treasury only (no risk assets)
  [ ] QI's liability for fund loss: insured? bonded?

FUND SECURITY:
  [ ] Fidelity bond: minimum $5M for exchanges over $1M
  [ ] Errors & omissions (E&O) insurance: minimum $2M
  [ ] FDIC coverage: funds in accounts at FDIC-insured banks
  [ ] If funds > $250K: are they spread across multiple banks or covered by
      CDARS / IntraFi program for extended FDIC coverage?
  [ ] Written confirmation: QI certifies funds are segregated and insured

DOCUMENTATION:
  [ ] Assignment of purchase contract (relinquished): QI is assigned the sale contract
  [ ] Direct deed: deed goes from seller of relinquished directly to buyer
      (not through QI -- QI never takes title in a forward exchange)
  [ ] Notice to buyer of relinquished: buyer is notified of exchange and assignment
  [ ] Identification notice template provided by QI
  [ ] Timeline confirmation: QI confirms Day 45 and Day 180 dates in writing

QI BANKRUPTCY RISK:
  Problem: if QI goes bankrupt while holding exchange funds, exchanger may be
  an unsecured creditor and lose the funds.
  Mitigation:
    - Use a QI with segregated, qualified escrow accounts
    - Require written representation that funds are not QI's property
    - Check QI's financial statements (if available)
    - Use QI that is affiliated with a large title company or bank
    - FEA (Federation of Exchange Accommodators) membership is a positive signal

Assignment of purchase contract:

At closing of relinquished property:
  1. Exchanger assigns the purchase/sale agreement to QI
  2. QI steps into exchanger's shoes as seller (on paper)
  3. Buyer pays purchase price to QI (not to exchanger)
  4. QI holds funds in escrow
  5. Deed goes directly from exchanger to buyer (direct deed requirement)
  6. Exchanger never touches the money (constructive receipt prevention)

CRITICAL: If exchanger receives any funds, even temporarily:
  - Constructive receipt destroys the exchange
  - The entire gain becomes taxable immediately
  - No cure: cannot "put the money back" with the QI
  - This includes: escrow accounts in exchanger's name, deposits returned
    to exchanger, earnest money refunded to exchanger (must go to QI)

At closing of replacement property:
  1. QI assigns the purchase agreement (replacement) to exchanger
  2. QI wires exchange proceeds to title company / escrow
  3. Deed goes directly from seller of replacement to exchanger
  4. Exchange is complete when replacement property title transfers

Amendment procedures:

Changes during the exchange period:
  - Identification letter: CANNOT be amended after Day 45 (IRS reg 1.1031(k)-1(c)(4))
  - Exchange agreement: can be amended by mutual written agreement of exchanger and QI
  - Closing date changes: notify QI of any date changes
  - If replacement PSA falls through: QI must be notified; exchange continues
    with remaining identified properties
  - QI fee changes: should be locked in the original agreement

Output: QI coordination checklist with status for each item, red flags identified, corrective actions recommended.

Workflow 8: Pipeline Dashboard

Aggregate view of the entire exchange pipeline -- all candidates, all deadlines, all risks -- in a single dashboard for daily monitoring.

Dashboard format:

=================================================================
1031 EXCHANGE PIPELINE DASHBOARD
=================================================================
Exchanger: [Name]
Exchange Type: [Forward / Reverse / Improvement]
QI: [Name]

TIMELINE STATUS:
  Day 0 (relinquished close): [date]
  Current day: Day [n] of 180
  Day 45 deadline: [date] -- [n] days remaining / PASSED
  Day 180 deadline: [date] -- [n] days remaining
  Tax return deadline: [date] (extension filed: Y/N)
  Controlling deadline: [date]

  STATUS BAR: [=========>............] Day 72 / 180

EXCHANGE FINANCIALS:
  Relinquished sale price:           $[amount]
  Relinquished debt retired:         $[amount]
  QI held proceeds:                  $[amount]
  Estimated gain deferred:           $[amount]
  Estimated tax saved:               $[amount]

CANDIDATE PIPELINE:
  | # | Property | Price | Boot | Score | Status | Est. Close |
  |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | 1 | 100 Main St | $5.2M | $0 | 8.2 | Under contract | Day 145 |
  | 2 | 500 Oak Ave | $4.8M | $200K | 5.8 | Touring | N/A |
  | 3 | ABC DST | $5.0M | $0 | 7.5 | Available | Day 90 |

IDENTIFICATION STATUS:
  Rule selected: 3-Property Rule
  Letter submitted: [Yes/No]
  Submission date: [date]
  Properties identified: [list]

RISK FLAGS:
  [ ] Boot exposure on candidate #2: $200K mortgage boot
  [ ] Candidate #1 title issue: easement dispute under review
  [ ] Day 45 approaching: [n] days remaining
  [ ] QI account verification pending

NEXT ACTIONS:
  1. [action] -- due [date] -- owner: [who]
  2. [action] -- due [date] -- owner: [who]
  3. [action] -- due [date] -- owner: [who]
=================================================================

Output: Complete pipeline dashboard updated to current day, with all candidates scored, deadlines tracked, risks flagged, and next actions listed.

Worked Example: $5M Forward Exchange, Family Office

Transaction facts:

• Relinquished property: 12-unit apartment building, Austin TX
• Sale price: $5,000,000
• Debt retired at closing: $3,200,000
• Selling costs: $175,000 (broker commission + transfer tax + legal)
• QI proceeds: $1,625,000 ($5M - $3.2M debt - $175K costs)
• Adjusted basis: $2,800,000
• Estimated gain: $2,200,000 ($5M - $2.8M basis)
• Depreciation recapture (Section 1250): $450,000
• Tax without exchange: ~$515,000 (federal + TX has no state income tax)
• Close date: January 10, 2026 (Day 0)
• Day 45: February 24, 2026
• Day 180: July 9, 2026
• Tax return due (with extension): October 15, 2026 (not limiting)

Step 1: Timeline construction

Day 0:   January 10, 2026 -- Close relinquished. QI receives $1,625,000.
Day 14:  January 24 -- Broad search complete. 6 candidates identified.
Day 25:  February 4 -- Toured 4 candidates. Financials received on 3.
Day 35:  February 14 -- Scored candidates. Top 2 + DST fallback selected.
Day 40:  February 19 -- Identification letter drafted and reviewed by counsel.
Day 43:  February 22 (Saturday) -- Letter must be sent Friday Feb 21.
Day 45:  February 24 (Monday) -- HARD DEADLINE.
         Letter sent via overnight courier Feb 20, confirmed delivered Feb 21.
Day 60:  March 11 -- PSA executed on primary candidate.
Day 90:  April 10 -- DD complete. Title clear. Lender approved.
Day 150: June 9 -- Pre-closing. Loan docs finalized.
Day 170: June 29 -- Closing scheduled.
Day 180: July 9 -- HARD DEADLINE.
         Closed on Day 170. Exchange complete.

Step 2: Candidate scoring

Candidate A: 20-unit multifamily, San Antonio TX
  Asking price: $5,200,000
  Estimated debt: $3,900,000 (75% LTV)
  Exchange value coverage: FULL ($5.2M > $5M)
  Cash boot: $0
  Mortgage boot: $0 ($3.9M > $3.2M)
  Days to close estimate: 90 days (clean property, motivated seller)
  Weighted score: 8.2
  Recommendation: PRIMARY -- identify in Slot 1

Candidate B: 16-unit multifamily, Dallas TX
  Asking price: $4,600,000
  Estimated debt: $3,000,000 (65% LTV)
  Exchange value coverage: SHORTFALL $400K
  Cash boot: $400,000
  Mortgage boot: $200,000 ($3.2M - $3.0M)
  Total boot exposure: $600,000 (would cost ~$140K in tax)
  Days to close estimate: 75 days
  Weighted score: 5.1
  Recommendation: DO NOT IDENTIFY (boot exposure too high)

Candidate C: ABC Realty DST -- Grocery-anchored retail, Houston TX
  Minimum investment: $100,000
  Can absorb full $1,625,000 QI proceeds
  Cash boot: $0
  Closing timeline: 10 business days
  Weighted score: 7.5
  Recommendation: FALLBACK -- identify in Slot 3

Candidate D: 8-unit multifamily, Houston TX
  Asking price: $2,100,000
  Would require second acquisition to absorb all proceeds
  Complexity: two closings, two sets of DD, two loans
  Weighted score: 4.8
  Recommendation: DO NOT IDENTIFY (complexity, insufficient coverage alone)

Step 3: Identification letter submitted

Properties identified under 3-Property Rule:
  1. 20-unit multifamily, 456 River Road, San Antonio, TX 78201 (FMV: $5,200,000)
  2. [Slot held for new candidate identified between Days 25-40]
     10-unit multifamily, 789 Lake Blvd, Austin, TX 78704 (FMV: $4,900,000)
  3. ABC Realty DST, Houston TX portfolio (FMV: $5,000,000 offering size)

Letter sent: February 20, 2026 (Day 41)
Delivery confirmed: February 21, 2026 (Day 42)
Method: FedEx overnight + email with read receipt

Step 4: Boot analysis (primary candidate)

Relinquished sale price:     $5,000,000
Replacement purchase price:  $5,200,000
Cash boot:                   $0 (replacement > relinquished)

Relinquished debt retired:   $3,200,000
Replacement debt obtained:   $3,900,000
Mortgage boot:               $0 (replacement debt > relinquished debt)

Total boot:                  $0
Tax deferred:                ~$515,000

Additional equity needed:
  Purchase price:            $5,200,000
  Debt:                     ($3,900,000)
  QI proceeds:              ($1,625,000)
  Closing costs (est.):        $125,000
  Additional equity wire:     ($200,000) -- exchanger must bring $200K fresh cash
                              to cover the $200K price premium + $125K closing costs
                              minus the $125K excess QI proceeds
  [Exact calculation at closing via funds-flow-calculator]

Output Format

Present results in this order:

1. Timeline Dashboard -- Day 0, Day 45, Day 180, current day, days remaining, all milestones
2. Identification Strategy -- rule selected, letter status, properties identified
3. Candidate Scorecard -- each candidate scored and ranked, boot exposure detailed
4. Boot Analysis -- cash and mortgage boot for each candidate, elimination strategies
5. Reverse Exchange Analysis -- if applicable: EAT structure, cost, timeline, feasibility
6. DST Fallback Evaluation -- if applicable: candidate DSTs scored, cost comparison
7. QI Coordination Status -- checklist with current status for each item
8. Pipeline Dashboard -- aggregated view of all deadlines, candidates, risks, next actions
9. Open Items -- unresolved questions, pending verifications, action items with owners

Red Flags and Failure Modes

1. Day 45 approaching with no identified properties: This is the single most common exchange failure. If Day 30 arrives with no viable candidates, invoke DST fallback analysis immediately. Do not wait until Day 44. Mail delivery delays, QI office closures on weekends, and courier errors can make a Day 44 submission arrive on Day 46 -- which is a complete exchange failure.

2. Replacement property value < relinquished property value (boot exposure): Every dollar of shortfall is taxable boot. Calculate boot exposure for every candidate before identification. Present the tax cost of boot alongside the property merits. Some exchangers knowingly accept partial boot -- that is a valid decision if the tax cost is understood. An unknowing boot surprise is a failure.

3. QI holding exchange funds in non-segregated account: If the QI commingles exchange funds with its own operating funds or other exchangers' funds, the exchanger is exposed to QI bankruptcy risk. Demand written confirmation of segregated, FDIC-insured accounts. If QI cannot provide this, change QIs immediately -- even mid-exchange if necessary (consult counsel).

4. Constructive receipt of funds (exchanger touches the money): If the exchanger receives any exchange proceeds -- even momentarily, even by accident -- the exchange is destroyed. No cure exists. This includes: earnest money deposits returned to exchanger instead of QI, escrow agent releasing funds to exchanger, closing agent mistakenly wiring proceeds to exchanger's account. Prevention: all wire instructions must route to QI or to title company per QI's instructions.

5. Related party transaction without 2-year hold: Exchanging with a related party (family member, controlled entity, >50% owned entity) is permitted BUT both parties must hold their respective properties for at least 2 years after the exchange. If either party sells within 2 years, the exchange is retroactively disqualified and all deferred gain becomes immediately taxable. This is an IRS audit target.

6. Improvement exchange timeline exceeding 180 days: Build-to-suit and improvement exchanges require all construction to be completed within the 180-day window. Construction delays are the most common failure mode. Pad the construction timeline by 30-45 days. If the general contractor cannot commit to completion within the window, do not pursue an improvement exchange.

7. DST being used as primary strategy without cost comparison: DSTs are expensive (total fees over a 7-10 year hold can reach 8-12% of invested capital). Always compare: total DST cost vs. simply paying the tax and investing the net proceeds directly. If the DST fee drag approaches the tax cost, the liquidity and control benefits of direct ownership (after paying tax) may be superior. DSTs should be a fallback or a deliberate passive strategy, not a default.

8. State tax clawback risk: California, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Montana do not fully conform to federal 1031 rules or impose clawback provisions. If the relinquished property was in CA and the replacement is out of state, CA may tax the deferred gain when the replacement is eventually sold. Confirm state rules before identifying replacement properties in different states.

Chain Notes

• Upstream: 1031-exchange-executor provides the exchange structure design, qualification analysis, and tax planning that precedes pipeline management. Once the exchange is structured and the relinquished property closes, pipeline management begins.
• Upstream: deal-quick-screen screens replacement property candidates for basic investment merit before they enter the pipeline.
• Upstream: acquisition-underwriting-engine underwrites replacement property candidates identified through the pipeline.
• Downstream: funds-flow-calculator handles the closing mechanics when the replacement property is ready to close -- QI wire coordination, prorations, settlement statement.
• Downstream: closing-checklist-tracker tracks the pre-closing conditions for the replacement property acquisition.
• Peer: dd-command-center runs due diligence on replacement candidates in parallel with the exchange timeline. DD timeline must fit within the remaining exchange window.
• Lateral: loan-sizing-engine sizes debt on replacement candidates to confirm debt replacement adequacy and boot avoidance.