Use when "literature review", "research synthesis", "systematic review", "academic search", or asking about "find papers", "cite sources", "research gaps", "meta-analysis", "bibliography"
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using academic databases.
Define Research Question (PICO framework for clinical)
Establish Scope
Develop Search Strategy
Key Databases:
| Database | Coverage |
|---|---|
| PubMed | Biomedical, life sciences |
| arXiv | Physics, CS, math preprints |
| Semantic Scholar | Broad academic |
| Google Scholar | Broad coverage |
| Web of Science | Multidisciplinary |
Search Strategy Template:
(term1 OR synonym1) AND (term2 OR synonym2) AND (term3)
Title/Abstract Screening
Full-Text Review
Organize Thematically:
## Theme 1: [Topic]
- Finding A (Author, Year)
- Finding B (Author, Year)
- Synthesis and gaps
## Theme 2: [Topic]
...
Comparison Table:
| Study | Methods | Sample | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author 2023 | RCT | n=100 | Finding X |
| Author 2022 | Cohort | n=500 | Finding Y |
Structure:
**APA 7:**
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title. Journal, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxx
**Nature:**
Author, A. A. & Author, B. B. Title. Journal Volume, pages (Year).
**Vancouver:**
Author AA, Author BB. Title. Journal. Year;Volume(Issue):pages.
For RCTs: Cochrane Risk of Bias tool For Observational: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale For Qualitative: CASP checklist
Records identified (n=X)
↓
Duplicates removed (n=X)
↓
Records screened (n=X)
↓
Records excluded (n=X)
↓
Full-text assessed (n=X)
↓
Studies included (n=X)