Perform iterative research document review using Rule of 5 methodology. Reviews accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, and integration with project context.
Perform thorough research document review using the Rule of 5 - iterative refinement until convergence.
If research document path provided: Read the document completely
If no path: Ask for the research document path or list available research documents
Perform 5 passes, each focusing on different aspects. After each pass (starting with pass 2), check for convergence.
Focus on:
Output format:
PASS 1: Accuracy & Sources
Issues Found:
[ACC-001] [CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM|LOW] - Section/Paragraph
Description: [What's inaccurate or unsourced]
Evidence: [Why this is problematic]
Recommendation: [How to fix with specific guidance]
[ACC-002] ...
What to look for:
Focus on:
Prefix: COMP-001, COMP-002, etc.
What to look for:
Focus on:
Prefix: CLAR-001, CLAR-002, etc.
What to look for:
Focus on:
Prefix: ACT-001, ACT-002, etc.
What to look for:
Focus on:
Prefix: INT-001, INT-002, etc.
What to look for:
After each pass (starting with pass 2), report:
Convergence Check After Pass [N]:
1. New CRITICAL issues: [count]
2. Total new issues this pass: [count]
3. Total new issues previous pass: [count]
4. Estimated false positive rate: [percentage]
Status: [CONVERGED | ITERATE | NEEDS_HUMAN]
Convergence criteria:
If CONVERGED before Pass 5: Stop and report final findings.
After convergence or completing all passes:
## Research Review Final Report
**Research:** [path/to/research.md]
### Summary
Total Issues by Severity:
- CRITICAL: [count] - Must fix before using research
- HIGH: [count] - Should fix before using research
- MEDIUM: [count] - Consider addressing
- LOW: [count] - Nice to have
Convergence: Pass [N]
### Top 3 Most Critical Findings
1. [ACC-001] [Description] - Section [N]
Impact: [Why this matters]
Fix: [What to do]
2. [COMP-003] [Description] - Section [N]
Impact: [Why this matters]
Fix: [What to do]
3. [ACT-002] [Description] - Conclusions
Impact: [Why this matters]
Fix: [What to do]
### Recommended Revisions
1. [Action 1 - specific and actionable]
2. [Action 2 - specific and actionable]
3. [Action 3 - specific and actionable]
### Verdict
[READY | NEEDS_REVISION | NEEDS_MORE_RESEARCH]
**Rationale:** [1-2 sentences explaining the verdict]
### Research Quality Assessment
- **Accuracy**: [Excellent|Good|Fair|Poor] - [brief comment]
- **Completeness**: [Excellent|Good|Fair|Poor] - [brief comment]
- **Actionability**: [Excellent|Good|Fair|Poor] - [brief comment]
- **Clarity**: [Excellent|Good|Fair|Poor] - [brief comment]