Structured C-suite onboarding through a founder interview that captures company context across 7 dimensions. Generates a persistent company context file used by all C-level advisory skills. Includes quarterly refresh protocol, context quality scoring, and graceful handling of missing information. Use when setting up advisory context for the first time, refreshing stale company context, or onboarding a new executive.
Tier: POWERFUL Category: C-Level Advisory Tags: onboarding, company context, founder interview, advisor setup, context capture, executive onboarding
C-Suite Onboarding captures the company context that powers every C-level advisory skill. One structured conversation produces a persistent context file that transforms generic advice into specific, situationally-aware guidance. Without context, advisory skills give textbook answers. With context, they give your-company answers.
| Command | Duration | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
/cs:setup | 45 minutes | Full onboarding interview across 7 dimensions |
/cs:update | 15 minutes | Quarterly refresh -- what changed since last capture |
/cs:score | 5 minutes | Assess context completeness and freshness |
This is a conversation, not a form. Follow these rules:
Opening line:
"Tell me about the company in your own words -- what are you building and why does it matter?"
Then let the conversation flow naturally across the 7 dimensions.
What to capture: What they do, who it is for, the real founding "why," one-sentence pitch, non-negotiable values.
Key probes:
Red flags:
What to capture: Headcount (FT vs contractors), revenue range, runway, stage label, what broke in the last 90 days.
Key probes:
Stage Definitions:
| Stage | Signal | Typical Challenges |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-PMF | <$500K ARR, pivoting, searching | Finding the right customer/problem/solution fit |
| Early PMF | $500K-$2M ARR, repeatable sales | Hiring, process, not breaking what works |
| Scaling | $2M-$10M ARR, growth machine building | Middle management, culture preservation, unit economics |
| Optimizing | $10M+ ARR, efficiency focus | Innovation stagnation, org complexity, market defense |
What to capture: Self-identified superpower, acknowledged blind spots, archetype, what actually keeps them up at night.
Key probes:
Founder Archetypes:
| Archetype | Strength | Blind Spot | Advisory Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Deep user empathy, product vision | Sales, go-to-market, delegation | Revenue strategy, hiring |
| Technical | Engineering excellence, technical moats | Business model, communication | GTM, storytelling, team |
| Sales | Revenue generation, relationships | Product depth, technical debt | Product strategy, engineering |
| Operator | Execution, processes, efficiency | Vision, innovation, risk-taking | Strategy, long-term planning |
Red flags:
What to capture: Team described in 3 words, last real conflict and how it was resolved, which values are real vs aspirational, strongest and weakest leader.
Key probes:
Red flags:
What to capture: Who is winning and why (honest version), real unfair advantage, the competitive move that could hurt them.
Key probes:
Red flags:
What to capture: Priority stack-rank across product/growth/people/money/operations, the decision they have been avoiding, the "one extra day" answer.
Key probes:
The "avoided decision" is often the most valuable insight. Common avoided decisions:
What to capture: 12-month target (specific and measurable), 36-month target (directional), exit vs build-forever orientation, personal success definition.
Key probes:
Red flags:
After the interview, generate the context file at ~/.claude/company-context.md:
# Company Context
**Last updated:** [Date]
**Freshness:** Fresh (< 90 days)
**Completeness:** [X/7 dimensions captured]
**Interviewed:** [Founder name and role]
## 1. Company Identity
**What we do:** [One sentence]
**Who it's for:** [Target customer]
**Why it matters:** [Founding motivation -- the real version]
**One-line pitch:** [Elevator pitch]
**Non-negotiable values:** [Values they would fire over]
## 2. Stage & Scale
**Stage:** [Pre-PMF / Early PMF / Scaling / Optimizing]
**Headcount:** [X FT + Y contractors]
**Revenue:** [$X ARR / MRR]
**Runway:** [X months at current burn]
**Morning metric:** [What they check first]
**Recent break:** [What broke in last 90 days]
## 3. Founder Profile
**Archetype:** [Product / Technical / Sales / Operator]
**Superpower:** [Self-identified strength]
**Blind spot:** [Acknowledged weakness]
**Up-at-night:** [Current anxiety]
**Co-founder dynamic:** [Healthy / Strained / Solo]
## 4. Team & Culture
**Team in 3 words:** [Their words]
**Real values:** [Values that are actually lived]
**Aspirational values:** [Values that are work-in-progress]
**Key person risk:** [Who they cannot lose]
**Weakest link:** [Leadership gap]
**Last conflict:** [What happened and how resolved]
## 5. Market & Competition
**Winning competitor:** [Who and why]
**Real unfair advantage:** [Not the investor version]
**Kill-shot risk:** [Competitive move that could hurt them]
**Market position:** [Leader / Challenger / Niche / Emerging]
## 6. Current Challenges
**Priority #1:** [Top challenge area]
**Priority stack:** [Rank of product/growth/people/money/ops]
**Avoided decision:** [What they have been putting off]
**One-extra-day:** [What they would spend time on]
## 7. Goals & Ambition
**12-month target:** [Specific, measurable]
**36-month target:** [Directional]
**Orientation:** [Build to sell / Build forever / Undecided]
**Personal success:** [What success means for the founder personally]
## Notes
[Observations, inferred patterns, things to watch]
[CONTEXT UPDATE entries from subsequent sessions]
Rules:
[not captured] for unknowns -- never leave blank| Dimensions Captured | Score | Label |
|---|---|---|
| 7/7 | 100% | Complete |
| 5-6/7 | 70-85% | Good (identify gaps) |
| 3-4/7 | 40-55% | Partial (schedule follow-up) |
| 1-2/7 | 15-25% | Minimal (re-interview needed) |
| Age | Score | Label | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 30 days | Fresh | High confidence | Use directly |
| 30-90 days | Aging | Medium confidence | Use, flag what may have changed |
| 90-180 days | Stale | Low confidence | Prompt for /cs:update |
| > 180 days | Expired | Very low confidence | Re-interview recommended |
| Signal | Confidence Impact |
|---|---|
| Full interview completed | +High |
| Update done within 90 days | +Medium |
| Key fields populated with specifics | +High |
| Fields contain vague/generic answers | -Medium |
| Financial fields missing | -High (for CFO/CEO skills) |
| "Not captured" in 3+ fields | -High |
/cs:update)Trigger: Every 90 days or after a major event (fundraise, reorg, pivot, key hire/departure).
Opening: "It has been [X time] since we captured your company context. Let's do a quick refresh. What has changed?"
Walk each dimension with a single "what changed?" question:
| Dimension | Refresh Question |
|---|---|
| Identity | "Still the same mission, or has it shifted?" |
| Stage & Scale | "Team size, revenue, and runway now?" |
| Founder | "Has your role changed? What is stretching you?" |
| Team | "Any leadership changes? New key players?" |
| Market | "Any competitive surprises? Market shifts?" |
| Challenges | "What is the #1 problem now vs 90 days ago?" |
| Goals | "Still on track for the 12-month target?" |
After refresh:
Last updated timestampFreshDuring advisory conversations, new information surfaces. Capture it without disrupting flow.
Triggers for enrichment:
Protocol:
Never silently modify the context file. Always confirm before changes.
Handle gracefully -- never block the conversation.
| Missing | Approach |
|---|---|
| Stage | "Just to calibrate -- are you still finding PMF or scaling what works?" |
| Financials | Use stage + team size to infer. Note the inference. |
| Founder profile | Infer from conversation style. Mark as inferred. |
| Multiple founders | Context reflects interviewee. Note co-founder perspective may differ. |
| Recent context | "It's been a while since your last update. Should I assume things are roughly the same, or has something big changed?" |
The context file is loaded by every C-level advisory skill:
| Skill | Uses Context For |
|---|---|
| ceo-advisor | Strategic recommendations calibrated to stage and challenges |
| cfo-advisor | Financial guidance calibrated to runway and revenue |
| cto-advisor | Technical strategy calibrated to team and architecture |
| coo-advisor | Operations advice calibrated to scale and processes |
| cmo-advisor | Marketing strategy calibrated to stage and market position |
| internal-narrative | Narrative construction based on company truth |
| scenario-war-room | Risk variables calibrated to actual threats |
| Skill | Use When |
|---|---|
| ceo-advisor | Using context for strategic decisions |
| internal-narrative | Building narratives from the captured context |
| scenario-war-room | Modeling risks based on company context |
| context-engine | Technical implementation of context management for AI agents |
| Problem | Likely Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Founder gives vague, marketing-speak answers | Interview not building trust; questions too formal | Reset with a personal question; follow a thread they care about; use reflection ("So what you're really saying is...") |
| Key dimensions left as "[not captured]" after interview | Founder avoided topic or interview ran out of time | Note which dimensions were skipped (avoidance signals importance); schedule targeted follow-up for missing areas |
| Context file feels generic, could apply to any company | Interviewer used the framework as a script, not a map | Re-interview with focus on specifics: names, numbers, stories; capture their actual words, not paraphrases |
| Advisory skills still giving textbook answers despite context | Context file too sparse or stale (>90 days) | Run /cs:score to assess completeness and freshness; schedule /cs:update if freshness is Stale or Expired |
| Quarterly refresh takes too long or feels redundant | Refresh covering all 7 dimensions instead of focusing on changes | Lead with "What changed?" per dimension; skip unchanged areas quickly; target 15 minutes total |
| Multiple founders give conflicting context | Different perspectives on stage, challenges, or priorities | Note the conflict explicitly in context file; mark which founder provided which data; flag for resolution |
| Context file modified without founder approval | AI agent or team member updated context silently | Enforce "never silently modify" rule; require explicit founder confirmation before any context update |
In scope: Structured founder interview across 7 dimensions (identity, stage, founder profile, team/culture, market/competition, challenges, goals), context file generation and maintenance, quarterly refresh protocol, context quality scoring (completeness and freshness), context enrichment during advisory sessions, privacy rules for external data handling, and missing context graceful handling.
Out of scope: Company financial modeling (use cfo-advisor), competitive intelligence gathering (use competitive-intel), team assessment or 360 reviews (use hr-operations/), product analytics (use cpo-advisor), and automated context capture from external data sources. This skill captures context through conversation, not data integration.
Limitations: Context quality depends entirely on founder candor; evasive or aspirational answers reduce advisory effectiveness. Single-founder interviews may miss co-founder perspectives. Context is a point-in-time snapshot; rapid company changes (pivot, reorg, fundraise) can make context stale before the 90-day refresh. Privacy rules prevent sharing specific context externally, which limits integration with external tools.