Investigation Protocol

2. Pre-Registration (Scientific+ Rigor)

Before running ANY experiment:

bd update <id> --notes "POWER_ANALYSIS: effect=[d] | alpha=[a] | power=[p] | min_N=[n] | method=[tool]"
bd update <id> --notes "SENSITIVITY_PLAN: param1=[range]; param2=[range]"
bd update <id> --acceptance "[specific criteria for confirm/refute]"

3. Methodologist Review Gate (Scientific+ Rigor)

Investigation CANNOT proceed until:

# Methodologist approves the design
bd update <id> --notes "METHODOLOGIST_REVIEW: APPROVED | REVIEWER:<reviewer-id>"

4. Run Experiment

# Execute the experiment
# Commit raw data to worktree: data/raw/
# Compute data hash
shasum -a 256 data/raw/<datafile>.csv
bd update <id> --notes "DATA_FILE:data/raw/<datafile>.csv"
bd update <id> --notes "DATA_HASH:sha256:<hash>"

5. Sensitivity Analysis

Test at least 2 parameter variations:

bd update <id> --notes "SENSITIVITY: param1=[values] -> effect=[range] | ROBUST:yes|no"
bd update <id> --notes "SENSITIVITY: param2=[values] -> effect=[range] | ROBUST:yes|no"

6. Create Finding

bd create "FINDING: [result summary with CI]" -t task --parent <epic>
bd update <finding-id> --notes "TYPE:finding | VALENCE:positive|negative|inconclusive | CONFIDENCE:0.X"
bd update <finding-id> --notes "SOURCE_TASK:<investigation-task-id>"
bd update <finding-id> --notes "EFFECT_SIZE:[d] | CI_95:[lo, hi] | N:[n] | STAT_TEST:[test] | P:[p]"
bd update <finding-id> --notes "DATA_FILE:<path>"
bd update <finding-id> --notes "DATA_HASH:sha256:<hash>"
bd update <finding-id> --notes "SENSITIVITY: [summary] | ROBUST:yes|no"
bd update <finding-id> --notes "REPLICATED:no | STAT_QUALITY:[pending] | REVIEWED_BY:[pending]"

7. Review Gates

Findings must pass through these gates before entering the knowledge store:

Negative Findings

Negative findings are equally important:

bd create "FINDING: [variable] has no measurable effect on [outcome]" -t task --parent <epic>
bd update <id> --notes "TYPE:finding | VALENCE:negative | CONFIDENCE:0.X"
bd update <id> --notes "IMPLICATION: [what this rules out, how it narrows hypothesis space]"

Replication Tasks

bd create "Replicate: [original finding description]" -t task -p 2 --parent <epic>
bd update <id> --description "TASK_TYPE:replication | RIGOR:scientific | TARGET:<original-task-id>"
bd update <id> --notes "MUST use different implementation than original"
bd update <id> --notes "MUST use same hypothesis and acceptance criteria as original"

Replication Policy (when to trigger)

• Finding would change investigation direction
• Finding has CI wider than 30% of effect size
• Finding contradicts Theorist's current model
• Finding has statistical quality score < 0.7

Replication Limits

• Max 2 replications per finding (3 total measurements)
• 2/3 agree → majority enters knowledge store
• All 3 disagree → finding marked CONTESTED, escalate to user

Serendipity Protocol

When you discover something unexpected:

bd update <id> --notes "SERENDIPITY:HIGH | DESCRIPTION:[what you found]"

The orchestrator may allocate up to 2 OODA cycles to pursue the lead.

Worktree Data Layout

<worktree>/
├── src/           # Code (if build task)
├── experiments/   # Experiment scripts
├── data/
│   ├── raw/       # Raw experimental data (CSV, JSON)
│   ├── processed/ # Cleaned/transformed data
│   └── figures/   # Generated plots
└── report.md      # Structured summary of work done