Review RRLMS workflow behavior against the intended regulatory reporting operating model. Use when validating submissions, approvals, requests, SLA rules, audit behavior, exception handling, reviewer experiences, or whether the app is ready to replace a manual regulatory tracking process.
Use this skill to answer the question "does this workflow actually match how regulatory reporting should operate?" instead of only "does the code compile?"
Read references/source-map.md when the task spans multiple workflows or when you need to rebuild domain context quickly.
docs/insight/end to end reporting.mddocs/reviews/end-to-end-reporting-gap-matrix-2026-03-20.mddocs/reviews/approval-runtime-technical-design-2026-03-20.mdWORKFLOW_PROGRESSION.mdAGENTS.mdsrc/app/pages/ or src/app/features/, then follow the API route, service, repository, and persisted records.supported, partial, and missing instead of guessing from one file.backend/app/domain/backend/app/services/submission_service*.pybackend/app/services/approval_runtime*.pybackend/app/services/request_service.pybackend/app/services/submission_timeline.pybackend/app/repositories/submissions.pybackend/app/repositories/requests.pysrc/app/features/report-catalog/src/app/features/submission-detail/src/app/features/requests/src/app/pages/ApprovalInbox.tsxsrc/app/pages/SubmissionQueue.tsxsrc/app/pages/SubmissionDetail.tsxsupported, partial, or missingsafe, needs enhancement, or blockerdb when the domain gap depends on schema shape or query contracts.security when the workflow change touches authorization, review links, or audit integrity.documentation-governance when the conclusion needs user manuals, operator playbooks, or help content updates.go-live-readiness when the conclusion feeds a release decision.