Trade sizing methods including fixed fractional, volatility-adjusted, Kelly criterion, and liquidity-constrained sizing
Position sizing is the single most important risk management decision in trading. Your entry signal determines direction; your position size determines survival. A mediocre strategy with proper sizing will outperform a great strategy with reckless sizing over any meaningful time horizon.
Core principle: Size determines survival, not entries. Two traders with the same signals but different sizing will have wildly different outcomes. The one who sizes conservatively survives drawdowns and compounds capital; the one who oversizes blows up.
| Method | Best For | Key Input |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed Fractional | General trading, most recommended | Account risk % |
| Volatility-Adjusted | Volatile markets, multi-asset | ATR or realized vol |
| Kelly Criterion | Quantified edge with track record | Win rate + payoff ratio |
| Liquidity-Constrained | Low-liquidity Solana tokens | Pool depth |
| Anti-Martingale | Trend-following strategies |
| Recent P&L streak |
The most recommended method for most traders. Risk a fixed percentage of your account on each trade.
risk_amount = account_value * risk_percentage
price_risk_per_unit = entry_price - stop_loss_price
position_size_units = risk_amount / price_risk_per_unit
position_value = position_size_units * entry_price
| Tier | Risk Per Trade | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 0.5–1% | New strategies, drawdown recovery |
| Standard | 1–2% | Most traders, proven strategies |
| Aggressive | 3–5% | High-conviction setups with strong, measured edge |
account = 10_000 # $10,000 or 100 SOL
risk_pct = 0.02 # 2%
entry = 1.50
stop_loss = 1.30
risk_amount = account * risk_pct # $200
price_risk = entry - stop_loss # $0.20
position_units = risk_amount / price_risk # 1,000 tokens
position_value = position_units * entry # $1,500
With this sizing, if the stop loss is hit, you lose exactly 2% of your account regardless of the token's price or volatility.
Scale position size inversely with volatility. When volatility is high, take smaller positions; when low, take larger positions. This normalizes the dollar risk across different market conditions.
adjusted_size = base_size * (target_vol / current_vol)
Where:
target_vol: your desired daily portfolio volatility (e.g., 2%)current_vol: the token's current daily volatility (from ATR or realized vol)atr_14 = 0.12 # 14-period ATR
close_price = 1.50
daily_vol_pct = atr_14 / close_price # 8%
target_daily_vol = account * 0.02 # $200 target daily move
position_size = target_daily_vol / atr_14 # 1,667 units
This automatically reduces exposure in volatile markets and increases it in calm ones.
The mathematically optimal fraction of capital to risk, maximizing long-term growth rate. Derived from maximizing expected logarithmic utility.
f* = (p * b - q) / b
Where:
p = win rate (probability of winning trade)q = 1 - p (probability of losing trade)b = average win / average loss (payoff ratio)f* = optimal fraction of capital to riskEquivalent form: f* = (p * (b + 1) - 1) / b
Full Kelly assumes perfect knowledge of your edge. In practice, edge estimates are noisy. Always use fractional Kelly:
| Fraction | Use Case | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25x Kelly | Conservative, recommended default | Robust to edge estimation error |
| 0.50x Kelly | Moderate, for well-measured edges | Still significant drawdown risk |
| 1.0x Kelly | Never in practice | Theoretical maximum, catastrophic if edge is overestimated |
win_rate = 0.55 # 55% win rate
avg_win = 2.0 # Average win is 2x the average loss
avg_loss = 1.0
payoff_ratio = avg_win / avg_loss # b = 2.0
kelly = (win_rate * payoff_ratio - (1 - win_rate)) / payoff_ratio
# kelly = (0.55 * 2.0 - 0.45) / 2.0 = 0.325 = 32.5%
quarter_kelly = kelly * 0.25 # 8.1% — use this
half_kelly = kelly * 0.50 # 16.25%
If Kelly is negative, you have no edge. Do not trade.
See references/sizing_formulas.md for the full mathematical derivation.
Critical for Solana tokens. Even if your risk model says you can take a large position, the pool may not support it without unacceptable slippage.
slippage ≈ trade_size / pool_liquidity
max_trade = pool_liquidity * max_slippage_pct
| Constraint | Guideline |
|---|---|
| Max single trade | 2% of pool liquidity |
| Max position | 5% of pool liquidity |
| Minimum pool depth | 10x your desired position size |
pool_sol = 500 # 500 SOL in pool
max_slippage = 0.02 # 2% max slippage
max_trade_sol = pool_sol * max_slippage # 10 SOL
# For a $150 SOL price, that's $1,500 max per trade
Always check all pools, not just the largest. Aggregate liquidity across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora for the full picture. See the liquidity-analysis skill for pool depth assessment.
Increase size after wins, decrease after losses. This is the opposite of the gambler's fallacy (Martingale). The logic: winning streaks may indicate your strategy is in sync with the market; losing streaks may indicate regime change.
def anti_martingale_size(
base_size: float,
consecutive_wins: int,
consecutive_losses: int,
scale_factor: float = 0.25,
max_multiplier: float = 2.0,
min_multiplier: float = 0.5,
) -> float:
if consecutive_losses > 0:
multiplier = max(min_multiplier, 1.0 - consecutive_losses * scale_factor)
elif consecutive_wins > 0:
multiplier = min(max_multiplier, 1.0 + consecutive_wins * scale_factor)
else:
multiplier = 1.0
return base_size * multiplier
Use conservatively. After 3+ consecutive losses, reducing size by 50% protects capital during drawdowns.
Combine all methods and take the most conservative result:
1. Calculate Kelly size → theoretical max based on edge
2. Calculate fixed fractional → risk-based size
3. Calculate volatility-adjusted → vol-normalized size
4. Calculate liquidity-constrained max → market-based ceiling
5. Final size = min(all four) → binding constraint wins
The binding constraint tells you what is limiting your size:
Individual position sizing is necessary but not sufficient. You also need portfolio-level constraints:
| Limit | Guideline | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Max single position | 10% of portfolio | Diversification floor |
| Max correlated exposure | 25% of portfolio | Correlated assets move together |
| Max total exposure | 50–80% of portfolio | Cash reserve for opportunities/margin |
| Max positions | 5–10 concurrent | Attention and management bandwidth |
PumpFun and early-stage meme tokens require special sizing discipline:
# PumpFun sizing example
account_sol = 100
meme_budget = account_sol * 0.05 # 5 SOL total for memes
per_trade = meme_budget / 10 # 0.5 SOL each, 10 shots
| Skill | Integration |
|---|---|
risk-management | Portfolio-level limits, drawdown rules |
liquidity-analysis | Pool depth data for liquidity constraints |
kelly-criterion | Deeper Kelly math, edge estimation |
exit-strategies | Stop loss placement affects fixed fractional sizing |
volatility-modeling | Better vol estimates for volatility-adjusted sizing |
slippage-modeling | Precise slippage estimates for liquidity constraints |
references/sizing_formulas.md — Mathematical derivations for all sizing methods with worked examplesreferences/practical_guide.md — Sizing by account size, token type, and common mistakesscripts/size_calculator.py — Calculates position size using all methods, shows binding constraintscripts/portfolio_sizer.py — Portfolio risk dashboard with per-position risk and available budget# Minimal fixed fractional sizing — copy-paste starter
def calc_position_size(
account: float, risk_pct: float, entry: float, stop: float
) -> float:
"""Return number of units to buy."""
risk_amount = account * risk_pct
price_risk = abs(entry - stop)
if price_risk == 0:
return 0.0
return risk_amount / price_risk