Maintain evidence-based gourmet shortlists in a repo (gourmet/CITY/{overview,candidates,notes,top-places,excluded}.md): discover and triage candidates, gather multi-source evidence with URLs, score consistently, publish Top Picks/Backups, record exclusions for auditability, and choose appropriate review/guide sources based on the region (don’t hard-code country-specific platforms).
Build and maintain traceable, comparable, auditable, actionable food recommendations (restaurants/cafes/desserts) with multi-source evidence and consistent scoring.
Use references/repo-spec.md for repo-structure rules and references/templates.md for copy/paste templates.
gourmet/CITY/candidates.md with status: inbox.gourmet/CITY/notes.md (template in references/templates.md).researching → shortlisted / top / rejected).notes.md).unknown).top-places.md: Top Picks (high confidence) + Backups (good alternatives) + a short plan/strategy section + a checklist section (names follow the repo’s conventions).excluded.md: record why a place was rejected (auditable).verify_city.sh CITYDIR to quickly detect “inbox” items, pending decisions, and unchecked research checklist items.--repo-root /path/to/repo.verify_city.sh --check-headers CITYDIR.Do not hard-code a single review platform globally. Pick sources that match the locale and availability, and state which you used in notes.md.
Choose sources by asking: “What do locals use, and what has the best coverage for this exact city + price tier?”
Recommended source mix (3–5 total):
Anti-patterns:
references/repo-spec.md: structure + auditability rules (generic).references/templates.md: doc templates and evidence blocks.scripts/verify_city.sh: quick structural/completion checks.