Challenge analytical choices with tough referee-style questions before submission
Challenge a section, finding, or specification with 5-7 tough questions a skeptical referee would ask. Purpose: identify weaknesses before submission.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — what to challenge (e.g., "identification strategy", "Table 1 results", "2-background section").
Generate 5-7 specific, challenging questions with:
Format each as:
### Q[N]: [Question]
**Threat:** [What this challenges]
**Response:** [Best available answer]
**Vulnerability:** [What remains unaddressed]
**Action:** [NONE / ADD ROBUSTNESS / REVISE TEXT / FUTURE WORK]