Session Handoff — Zero-Loss Context Packaging

Step 1: Classify the Session

Determine these parameters from the conversation history (ask the user only if genuinely ambiguous):

These parameters shape how you weight different parts of the package. A debugging session needs verbatim error codes; a philosophy session needs dialectic tracking; a creative session needs tonal preservation.

Step 2: Signal Extraction

Scan the full session history using domain-adapted parsing:

Engineering Sessions

• Preserve: stack traces, error codes, UUIDs, function signatures, file paths, diffs, dependency versions, architecture decisions, environment variables
• Extract: the causal chain of bugs/fixes, what was tried and failed

Physics / Math Sessions

• Preserve: LaTeX expressions verbatim (do not simplify), constants, derivation steps, notation conventions, coordinate choices
• Extract: which steps are proved vs. assumed vs. conjectured, layer dependencies

Philosophy / Creative Sessions

• Preserve: dialectic shifts, metaphor evolution, tonal changes, key phrasings that carry semantic load
• Extract: thesis evolution, which framings were abandoned and why

Business / Strategy Sessions

• Preserve: KPIs, OKRs, resource constraints, stakeholder positions, timelines
• Extract: decision rationale, risk assessments, trade-offs made

Noise filtering: Strip conversational filler ("Thanks!", "Can you check?") but always preserve the intent behind the query. If "Can you check?" was really "I suspect this is wrong but I'm not sure where" — capture that suspicion.

Step 3: Liminal Analysis

This is the highest-value, hardest-to-reconstruct layer. Capture:

1. Rejected Paths — Ideas discussed and discarded. Record why they were rejected so the next session doesn't regress into re-exploring them.

2. Assumptions — Leaps in logic that weren't fully proven but were treated as true. Label each explicitly as [Assumption] with confidence level (high/medium/low).

3. Intuitions — Hunches, pattern-recognitions, "I think this might connect to..." moments that haven't been formalized yet. These are often the most valuable signals.

4. Tonal State — Was the session exploratory and loose? Rigid and debugging-focused? Frustrated and blocked? Triumphant and building? The next agent needs to match this energy or consciously shift it.

5. Unfinished Threads — Topics that were raised but not resolved, questions asked but not answered, tangents that might be important later.

6. Emergent Connections — Abstract links between concepts that surfaced during discussion but weren't the main focus. These often become the main focus next time.

Step 4: Generate the Package

Create all files in /home/claude/handoff/ and then copy to /mnt/user-data/outputs/handoff/.

File Manifest

handoff/
  00_executive_narrative.md      — The "Story of the Session"
  01_state_snapshot.json         — Machine-readable context (validated against schema)
  02_active_context.md           — Current focus, hot paths, immediate blockers
  03_concept_map.mmd             — Mermaid mindmap of entities/relationships explored
  04_decision_log.md             — Decisions made, alternatives rejected, rationale
  05_liminal_space.md            — Intuitions, assumptions, tone, "the unsaid"
  06_next_actions.md             — Prioritized action matrix with difficulty estimates
  07_environment_spec.md         — Technical environment, axioms, constants assumed

File-by-File Instructions

00_executive_narrative.md

Write this as cohesive paragraphs, not bullet points. Tell the story of the session as a causal chain:

"The session began with X. We explored Y, which led to the discovery that Z. This contradicted our earlier assumption about W, so we pivoted to A. The key breakthrough was B, which resolved the original question but opened new questions about C and D."

Structure: Opening context → Key developments (chronological) → Turning points → Current state → What's next. The reader should understand the arc of the session.

01_state_snapshot.json

Must validate against the schema in references/state_schema.md. Key fields:

• status: one of stable | volatile | blocked | complete
• focus.cursor_position: a plain-language description of where we are in the problem space — not a file path, but a conceptual location
• entities: every significant noun — projects, functions, theorems, people, files, concepts — with type, state, and definition
• knowledge_graph: adjacency list showing how entities relate
• sentiment.frustration_level: 0.0 (calm exploration) to 1.0 (deeply blocked)

Run the validation script after generating:

python <this-skill-directory>/scripts/validate_snapshot.py /home/claude/handoff/01_state_snapshot.json

02_active_context.md

The "dashboard" view. Contains:

• Primary Focus: What we're actively working on right now
• Hot Paths: Lines of investigation that are live and promising
• Blockers: What's preventing progress, with specificity
• Dependencies: What needs to happen before what
• Quick Resume Instructions: 2-3 sentences a new agent can read to start immediately

03_concept_map.mmd

A Mermaid mindmap showing the session's conceptual territory. Use this structure:

mindmap
  root((Session Topic))
    Branch A
      Sub-concept A1
      Sub-concept A2
        Detail
    Branch B
      Sub-concept B1
    Rejected
      Discarded Idea X
      Discarded Idea Y

Color-code or label: active paths vs. rejected paths vs. open questions. Keep it to 15-30 nodes — enough to map the territory, not so many it's noise.

After generating, validate it renders:

python <this-skill-directory>/scripts/render_mermaid.py /home/claude/handoff/03_concept_map.mmd

04_decision_log.md

For each significant decision in the session:

### Decision: [Short title]
- **Chosen**: [What was decided]
- **Alternatives considered**: [What else was on the table]
- **Rationale**: [Why this path was chosen]
- **Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Reversibility**: [Easy/Hard/Irreversible]
- **Downstream effects**: [What this decision constrains or enables]

05_liminal_space.md

The most unusual and valuable file. Contains:

• Session Tone: Paragraph describing the emotional/intellectual texture
• Unspoken Assumptions: Things treated as true without explicit proof
• Intuitive Leaps: Pattern-recognitions that haven't been formalized
• Rejected Ideas (with burial reasons): Why each was abandoned
• Emergent Threads: Connections that surfaced but weren't pursued
• Open Questions: Things we don't know yet but should
• Meta-Observations: Patterns in how the session itself evolved

Write this in a reflective, observational tone. This file is where the "between the lines" content lives.

06_next_actions.md

An action matrix, not just a list:

| Priority | Action | Owner | Difficulty | Confidence | Dependencies | Notes |
|----------|--------|-------|------------|------------|--------------|-------|
| P0       | ...    | User  | Medium     | 85%        | None         | ...   |
| P1       | ...    | AI    | Hard       | 60%        | P0           | ...   |

• Priority: P0 (do immediately) through P3 (backlog)
• Difficulty: Easy / Medium / Hard / Unknown
• Confidence: How sure we are this is the right next step (0-100%)

07_environment_spec.md

Everything about the technical/intellectual environment:

• Language/framework versions, OS, hardware constraints
• Library dependencies with exact versions
• Environment variables and configuration
• For physics/math: coordinate systems, notation conventions, axiom sets
• For philosophy: philosophical framework, key terms defined
• For creative: voice guidelines, audience, format constraints

Step 5: Quality Gates

Before presenting the package, self-evaluate on these axes (score 0-5 each):

1. Resumability — Can a new model start work in <10 seconds of reading 02_active_context.md?
2. Ambiguity Reduction — Are all pronouns resolved to specific entities?
3. Context Density — Is the signal-to-noise ratio maximized?
4. Liminal Capture — Did we save intent, not just text?
5. Completeness — Are all 8 files present and non-trivial?

Minimum passing score: 20/25. If below, identify the weakest file and improve it.

Also identify: Top Risk — the single most critical piece of context that is missing or ambiguous in the current session. State it explicitly so the user can address it before closing out.

Step 6: Present the Package

1. Copy all files to /mnt/user-data/outputs/handoff/
2. Present using present_files — lead with 00_executive_narrative.md
3. State the quality gate scores
4. State the Top Risk
5. Offer to adjust any file before the user closes the session

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

• Bullet-point narratives: The executive narrative must be paragraphs, not lists
• Vague cursor positions: "Working on the code" is useless. "Debugging the race condition in sync_manager.py:L142 where the mutex lock isn't releasing on timeout" is useful.
• Missing rejection reasons: Every rejected path needs a why
• Sentiment whitewashing: If the session was frustrating, say so. The next agent needs to know.
• Entity ambiguity: Every "it", "that", "the thing" must be resolved to a named entity
• Redundancy across files: Each file has a specific purpose. Don't repeat the narrative in the decision log or the next actions in the active context.