Judge Geval

Overview

• Use this skill when the reviewer should score a scientific artifact against several named dimensions rather than one overall impression.
• The emphasis is structured reasoning: inspect the artifact dimension by dimension, cite evidence, and then aggregate into a strict benchmark-style score.
• This skill is especially useful for project-definition review, experiment-design review, code review, and section-level report review.

Use When

• The task requires criterion-by-criterion scoring such as rigor, novelty, reproducibility, scope control, or clarity.
• The artifact should be judged with an explicit rubric instead of informal prose.
• You need actionable feedback tied to distinct dimensions rather than one generic verdict.

Evaluation Workflow

• Read the scenario contract, checklist, and artifact before scoring.
• Evaluate each dimension separately and ground each judgment in concrete evidence from the files.
• Penalize unsupported claims, missing artifacts, and vague checklist coverage.