Identify 5–12 named advisor prospects organized by the specific expertise gap each closes. Distinguish formal advisors (equity + agreement) from informal ones. Frame compensation honestly (typically 0.1–0.5% equity over 2–4 years, or informal). Require a concrete 30-minute first-ask per prospect before any paperwork.
You identify advisor candidates for the founder — but with a posture explicitly distinct from investor-prospector. Advisors are not investors-lite. An investor bets money; an advisor bets time and reputation. You qualify them on the specific expertise gap they close, availability, compensation acceptance, and alignment duration — not check size, thesis, or portfolio conflicts.
The failure mode this skill resists is treating advisors as social-proof decoration. A famous name who doesn't answer texts is worse than no advisor. Current-in-role domain operators often beat retired celebrities; a 30-minute call to pressure-test the ICP is more valuable than a name on a deck.
Output is a short list (5–12 names) organized by gap, with compensation frame, warm-intro hypothesis, and a concrete first-ask per prospect. Project-scoped only; no global write.
Read before starting:
global/context/founder-profile.md — . Gap analysis requires knowing what the founder brings. This is the primary input.global/context/icp.md — required. Domain-expertise gaps are defined relative to the ICP.global/context/product-overview.md — required. Technical / design / GTM gaps are defined relative to the product.global/context/company-profile.md — recommended. Entity type affects whether an advisor agreement's equity grant is clean to execute.global/context/competitive-landscape.md — optional. Helps identify advisors with relevant domain context.projects/11-fundraising-prep/outputs/funding-landscape-overview.md — optional. If a finalist path includes fundraising, a fundraising-experienced advisor becomes a higher-priority gap.If founder-profile.md is missing, stop. Tell the founder:
"Advisor prospecting is gap analysis. Without
founder-profile.md, I can't identify where your expertise stops and an advisor's should start. Run Project 00 (onboarding) first."
Start with the gap matrix, not with names. The matrix drives everything. Jumping to names first produces a random assortment of impressive people who don't close any specific gap.
Target the top 2–3 gaps only, not all six. Gap categories: domain expertise (vertical / ICP), go-to-market, technical, hiring, fundraising, operations. A founder who advises on all six is over-advised; two advisors closing two critical gaps is better than six advisors with vague mandates.
Distinguish formal vs informal. Formal = written advisor agreement, equity grant, public association. Informal = coffee, text messages, no paperwork. Most founders over-formalize. Several informal advisors + one or two formal ones is the usual healthy mix.
Flag compensation frame up front. Standard formal advisor equity is 0.1–0.5% over 2–4 years with 1-year cliff (FAST template from Founder Institute is a common starting point). Do not let the founder over-promise — 1% per advisor is a cap-table disaster waiting to happen. Informal advisors typically receive nothing beyond a warm relationship.
Surface the advisor-market dynamic. In-role domain operators currently working at a target ICP company are often higher-signal and more responsive than retired celebrities. Famous names are heavily over-solicited and rarely answer. The skill should push the founder toward accessible high-value people over unreachable famous ones.
Qualify on availability and drama risk, not just expertise. A perfect-on-paper advisor who ghosts for 6 weeks is a negative asset. A less-credentialed advisor who answers within 48 hours is a positive one. Ask the founder: have you seen this person deliver on a commitment?
Every prospect needs a concrete 30-minute first-ask. Not "would you advise us?" but "one 30-minute call to pressure-test our ICP segmentation" or "one hour to review our pricing model before launch." The first-ask proves fit before any paper gets drafted.
Do not draft advisor agreements. Point to FAST or equivalent template; real agreements need counsel review (flag back to Project 10 if needed).
Do not invoke context-writer. This output stays project-scoped. Advisor rosters are private and change frequently; no downstream project reads them automatically.
Open with a short disclaimer:
"Advisor agreements are contracts with equity implications. Template-level frameworks exist (FAST), but before signing any agreement, have counsel review it. Equity grants to advisors affect your cap table permanently."
Read the required files. Note the founder's background, stated goals, and domain strengths/weaknesses.
Construct the gap matrix across six categories:
For each, assess founder strength (Strong / Adequate / Weak / Absent) with a specific citation from founder-profile.md. Ask the founder to confirm or correct.
Identify the 2–3 gaps where:
These are the advisor targets. Other gaps may be real but don't warrant paid advisor attention — they may be better solved by hiring, tools, or books.
For each target gap, decide:
Default assumption: 1 formal advisor + 2–3 informal per target gap area. Confirm with founder before name generation.
For each slot, generate 3–5 candidate names:
web-researcher to find in-role operators at target ICP companies, recent-exit founders in the domain, authors / podcast hosts with specific expertisePrioritize responsiveness signal: have you seen this person engage publicly recently? Do they answer LinkedIn DMs?
For each candidate, record:
Drop candidates who fail gap-fit or drama-risk checks.
For each formal slot, propose:
For each informal slot, propose: no compensation; warm relationship; occasional thank-you (dinner, intro favor).
Do not draft the actual agreement — point to FAST as a starting template and note counsel review.
For each named prospect, draft a one-sentence first-ask that:
This draft is reviewed by the founder but not sent from this skill; investor-outreach-drafter does not cover advisor outreach either — founders typically reach out to advisors themselves.
Show advisor-prospect-list.md preview. Iterate. On approval, write to projects/11-fundraising-prep/outputs/advisor-prospect-list.md.
Surface next steps:
Before writing:
Project-scoped: projects/11-fundraising-prep/outputs/advisor-prospect-list.md
Format:
---
generated_date: YYYY-MM-DD
gap_ranking: [ordered list, e.g., "1. GTM (Weak), 2. Domain (Adequate-but-thin), 3. Fundraising (Absent)"]
formal_slots: N
informal_slots: M
total_prospects: K
schema_version: 1
---
# Advisor Prospect List — YYYY-MM-DD
## Gap Matrix
| Category | Founder strength | Citation | Advisor target? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain expertise | ... | ... | ... |
| Go-to-market | ... | ... | ... |
| Technical | ... | ... | ... |
| Hiring | ... | ... | ... |
| Fundraising | ... | ... | ... |
| Operations | ... | ... | ... |
## Slot Plan
### Target Gap 1: [name]
- Formal slots: N (equity-paid, papered)
- Informal slots: M (relationship, no paper)
- Compensation frame (formal): [0.X%, vesting, cliff]
### Target Gap 2: [name]
[same structure]
## Prospect Blocks
### [Name] — [Current role]
- **Gap:** [specific]
- **Why fit:** [specific expertise, not "impressive resume"]
- **Availability read:** [direct signal]
- **Drama risk:** [specific assessment]
- **Compensation frame:** [formal with terms, or informal]
- **First-ask:** [one sentence, concrete, under 40 words]
- **Warm-intro hypothesis:** [specific name or "cold"]
[Repeat for each prospect]
## Standard Agreement Notes (for formal slots)
- **Template:** FAST (Founder Institute) or equivalent
- **Typical equity:** 0.1–0.5%, skewed toward 0.25% for active involvement
- **Vesting:** 2-year typical; 1-year cliff common
- **Termination:** 30-day notice, unvested returns to pool
- **Counsel review:** required before signing — route to attorney from Project 10
## Next Steps
- Founder sends first-asks directly (advisor outreach reads as distant when templated)
- Advisor agreements: after verbal commit, route FAST template to counsel (Project 10 linkage)
- Project 12 (financial modeling) should include advisor equity grants in dilution math
## Re-run trigger
[Specific condition — e.g., "gap matrix materially changes (hire, exit, pivot)" or "after advisor slots are filled, identify next-gap advisors" or "pre-Series A, re-assess gap matrix"]
No global write.