Step 5: Compare research methodologies across all loaded papers. Classify, find patterns, and identify the weakest methodology.
Compare the research methodologies used across all loaded papers.
| Paper (Author, Year) | Methodology Type | Data Source | Sample Size (if stated) | Key Limitation (stated by authors) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {author, year} | {type} | {source} | {size or "not stated"} | {limitation} |
Use the methodology that best fits each paper. If a paper doesn't fit standard categories, add a new one. Examples of types: experiment, RCT, quasi-experiment, survey, simulation, meta-analysis, case study, computational methods, ML, literature review, ethnography, analysis of secondary data.
Identify the paper with the weakest methodology. Evaluate by:
State which criteria are most clearly violated.
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "All methodologies are equally valid" | They are not. Some have better controls, larger samples, or more transparency. |
| "I can't assess methodology quality" | Use the 4 criteria above. They apply to any methodology type. |
| "The paper doesn't describe its methodology" | That IS a methodology weakness. Note it as such. |