RFC-style review of major technical decisions using a 5-agent debate team. Spawns tech-lead, security-auditor, performance-analyst, reliability-engineer, and devils-advocate for independent analysis followed by structured discussion. Produces decision document with pros/cons, dissenting opinions, and recommendation. Use for architecture decisions, technology selection, major refactors, design reviews. Keywords: architecture, RFC, design review, technical decision, architecture review, design decision, major change
Orchestrate a 5-agent team for RFC-style technical decision reviews. Agents review independently, then debate trade-offs in structured discussion.
Extract the proposal from $ARGUMENTS. This could be:
.claude/rfcs/001-new-api.md)If a path is provided, read the file. If it's a description, use it directly. If it's an issue/PR, fetch it with gh.
Use the Teammate tool with operation spawnTeam to create the review team:
team_name: arch-review