Evidence-based nutrition and dieting guidance for body composition and performance. Use this whenever users ask about nutrition, calories, macros, protein targets, fat loss, cutting, bulking, recomping, meal timing, intermittent fasting, keto/low-carb, processed foods, diet adherence, plateaus, metabolic adaptation, weight-change pacing, or food-choice tradeoffs. Trigger aggressively for questions about what/how much to eat, how to lose fat or gain muscle, or how to adjust diet plans over time—even when users do not explicitly ask for "diet coaching."
sjawhar13 estrellas29 mar 2026
Ocupación
Categorías
Bienestar y Salud
Contenido de la habilidad
Use this as a practical, numbers-first coaching framework based on Eric Trexler's Stronger By Science diet guide.
Core SBS Decision Framework (Use in this order)
Set goal and pace
Fat loss: aim for 0.25-1.0% bodyweight/week (aggressive: >1%/week).
Gain: aim for 0.1-0.25% bodyweight/week (aggressive: >0.25%/week).
Maintain/recomp: prioritize stable trend plus performance/recovery metrics.
Set calories from a starting estimate (then transition to observation).
Set protein first (highest priority macro).
Set fat with a hard floor (never below floor).
Fill remaining calories with carbs according to training demands and preference.
Cover health basics: fiber, micronutrients, hydration, essential fats.
Track daily intake + standardized morning weigh-ins and adjust with trend data.
: react to sustained trend mismatch, not day-to-day noise.
Skills relacionados
Iterate calmly
SBS Epistemic Style
When uncertain, say so. SBS distinguishes:
"Strong evidence" (protein for muscle, calories for weight change)
"Popular claim, weak evidence" (calorie cycling, specific supplement stacks)
Match this calibration in responses — don't present contested claims as settled.
Calorie Starting Targets (Assume Method)
Goal pace
kcal/lb/day
kcal/kg/day
Aggressive cut
11
24.2
Moderate cut
13
28.6
Maintain
15
33.0
Moderate gain
17
37.4
Aggressive gain
19
41.8
Use as starting points, then individualize via observed weight trend.
Deficit/Surplus Ranges (Estimate Method)
Deficits for fat loss
Conservative: 10-20% below TDEE (or about 250-500 kcal/day below maintenance).
Moderate: about 500-750 kcal/day below maintenance.
Aggressive: 30-40% below TDEE (or about 750-1000 kcal/day below).
Surpluses for gain
Conservative/lean-biased: 5-10% above TDEE (or about +125 to +250 kcal/day).
Moderate: 10-20% above TDEE (or about +250 to +375 kcal/day).
Aggressive: 15-20% above TDEE (up to about +500 kcal/day).
Prefer percentage-based adjustments for very small/large people; flat kcal is less scalable.
Protein Targets (Direct-use defaults)
By training context
Lifters (muscle gain/retention focus): 1.6-2.2 g/kg/day (total body mass).
Non-lifters: 1.2-1.8 g/kg/day (total body mass).
Body-composition-adjusted ranges
If very high or very low body-fat, scale by fat-free mass: 2.0-2.75 g/kg FFM/day.
Practical broad range seen across healthy contexts: 1.25-3.1 g/kg FFM/day
(low end = sedentary, weight stable, higher body-fat; high end = lean, active, in deficit).
Meal distribution targets
Usually 3-6 protein feedings/day.
Aim each feeding for >=0.3 g/kg protein and ~2-3 g leucine.
Vegan/plant-heavy setups: prioritize complete EAA coverage and at least 3-4 substantial feedings/day.
Fat Targets and Floor
Typical fat target: 20-35% of calories.
In very high/very low calorie contexts, practical target range: 0.7-1.5 g/kg/day.
Typical lifter with performance goals: at least 3-4 g/kg/day if calories permit.
Endurance-heavy training: at least 6 g/kg/day.
General balanced (non-performance-priority): about 40-60% of calories from carbs.
Low-carb: often <=30% of calories (commonly capped around <=200 g/day).
Keto: usually <=50-60 g/day.
Low-carb/keto are viable for fat loss/maintenance, but not inherently superior for fat loss, hypertrophy, or cardiometabolic outcomes when protein and calories are matched.
Plateau Protocol (SBS-style)
Standardize data collection first
Weigh daily, morning, post-restroom, same scale/conditions.
Log calories/macros daily.
Check adherence and confounders before changing targets
Sodium shifts, carb shifts, hydration, bowel-content shifts can mask progress.
Wait for a meaningful trend window
Do not react to day-to-day noise.
Use ~1-2 weeks of trend data (or at least a full week of consistent data) before deciding.
If rate is slower than target
Cut: lower calories mostly via carbs + fats.
Keep protein on target.
Reduce fat and carbs together until fat floor is reached, then mostly reduce carbs.
If gain is slower than target
Raise calories via carbs and/or fat according to preference and training demands.
For poor appetite in bulks: use more liquid calories and more palatable foods.
Reassess after another trend window and repeat as needed.
Coaching Defaults (If-this-then-that)
Scenario
Default action
User wants simple cut start
Use 13 kcal/lb (28.6 kcal/kg), or 11 kcal/lb if explicitly aggressive.
User wants simple bulk start
Use 17 kcal/lb (37.4 kcal/kg), or 19 kcal/lb if explicitly aggressive.
User is lifting and unsure on protein
Start at 1.8 g/kg/day; keep in 1.6-2.2 range.
User is non-lifter and unsure on protein
Start at 1.4-1.6 g/kg/day within 1.2-1.8 range.
User is very lean in a cut
Bias protein upward (2.2+ g/kg TBM or toward high end of FFM range).
User is high body-fat and protein seems huge
Use FFM-based target (2.0-2.75 g/kg FFM).
Cut stalled but intake/adherence good
Reduce calories via carbs+fat; do not cut protein first.
Fat intake very low in a cut
Enforce height-based fat floor immediately.
High-intensity training performance dropping
Raise carbs toward >=3-4 g/kg (>=6 g/kg for endurance).
User asks low-carb vs low-fat winner
Explain adherence and calorie/protein matching drive outcomes; pick the one they can sustain.
Top 15 High-Priority SBS Points
Calories largely determine weight change direction and pace.
Protein is the first macro priority for muscle retention/gain.
Maintenance phases between bulk and cut are optional; there is no physiological requirement to include one.
Hardgainer problems are usually calorie problems, not protein problems.
BMI is useful at population level, but for taller lifters height^2.5 is often more appropriate than height^2 for size-indexing context.
Mass gainers are adherence tools (easy calories), not physiologically superior to matched whole-food intake.
Calorie cycling (e.g., lower on rest days) is not clearly evidence-supported when weekly calories/macros are matched.
Keto is not magic — matched calories and protein drive most body-composition outcomes.
Diet pattern choice (TRF, IF, low-carb, etc.) should be based on sustainability and performance fit.
Daily scale weight is noisy; use trends across at least about 1-2 weeks.
In cuts, reduce carbs/fat first and keep protein high.
Enforce a fat floor; very low fat is not a badge of discipline.
Carbs support high-intensity performance; lower carbs only when tradeoff is intentional.
Recomp is most feasible in newer lifters and/or higher body-fat contexts.
If adherence is poor, simplify structure before making extreme macro changes.