Minutes Recap

Interactive conflict detection

When you find conflicts between meetings (e.g., different decisions on the same topic, contradictory action items, or shifted priorities), don't just note them — ask the user about them.

Use AskUserQuestion: "I found a conflict between your meetings today: [Meeting A] decided [X], but [Meeting B] discussed doing [Y]. Which one is current?"

Options should include:

• The decision from Meeting A
• The decision from Meeting B
• "Neither — it's still unresolved"
• "Both are valid in different contexts"

This turns the recap from a passive report into an active reconciliation tool. Surface at most 2-3 conflicts per recap to avoid fatigue.

Gotchas

• No recordings today ≠ an error — If there are no meetings or memos for today, say "No recordings found for today" and offer to search a different date range. Don't hallucinate a recap.
• Voice memos are easy to miss — They live in ~/meetings/memos/, not the main ~/meetings/ directory. The search command includes both, but double-check if the user says "I recorded a voice memo today" and you don't see it.
• Meetings without LLM summarization have less structure — If a meeting file only has a raw transcript (no Summary, Decisions, or Action Items sections), you'll need to extract insights yourself from the transcript text. Check the YAML frontmatter for action_items: and decisions: fields.
• Cross-day meetings — A meeting that started at 11 PM and ended at 1 AM will be dated by its start time. If the user asks "what happened today" and is missing a late-night meeting, check yesterday's date too.