Full Light Curve Diagnose

Workflow

1. Inspect the file first: Call inspect_light_curve_schema with the CSV path before any other tool.

   • Use the detected time_col, y_col, yerr_col, band_col, scale, and any source metadata it finds.
   • If a filter/band column is present, treat the file as multi-band. Do not drop the band information.

2. Search catalogs before diagnosis: If the file head, user request, or schema inspection provides a source name or coordinates, call lookup_source_context immediately.

   • If VSX or Gaia information is available, you must use it in the reasoning and final report. Do not ignore catalog evidence.
   • VSX is the gate. If VSX returns a known variable match, skip further diagnosis work such as plotting for classification, GLS, BLS, or zoom recursion.
   • In that case, produce a report centered on the catalog identification, Gaia context (if returned), and any quick sanity notes from the light-curve schema.
   • Gaia context should be used when available to report parallax/proper motion plus diagnosis-relevant astrophysical hints such as Teff, logg, likely galaxy vs star, and likely binary/non-single-star status.
   • If VSX does not identify a known variable, keep the Gaia context in the final report and continue.

3. Initial Plotting: Call plot_light_curve_csv with the detected columns from step 1. Let the tool keep multi-band data together if a band/filter column exists.

   • Always pass a unique out_path for the diagnosis plot.
   • The output path must not be a shared generic filename. Use a path derived from the input file stem or source identifier, for example ./artifacts/{csv_stem}_diagnose_plot.png.

4. Visual Assessment: Call diagnose_plot_with_vlm on the image path returned by step 3.

   • The output will contain sections on variability type, morphology, and recommendations (GLS/BLS).

5. CRITICAL DECISION STEP (Do not stop here!): Read the text output from diagnose_plot_with_vlm carefully.

   • IF the text says "GLS Analysis: YES" (or similar), you MUST call obtain_GLS immediately.
   • IF the text says "BLS Analysis: YES" (or similar), you MUST call obtain_BLS immediately.
   • IF the text recommends Zoom-in visualization (or similar), you MUST call obtain_zoom_in immediately. With the time_ranges being the list of ranges suggested by the vision model.

   Note: Do not generate the final user response yet. You must run the recommended periodogram tools first.

6. Follow-up Analysis (If triggered):

   • If obtain_GLS was called, take the result and feed it into analysis_LS together with
     • candidate_type : a complete GLS candidate list suggested by diagnose_plot_with_vlm
     • Trust the GLS result when the binned points show a clear, coherent trend in any one of the P, 2P, or P/2 phase-folded panels.
     • GLS has higher priority than zoom-in morphology for periodic classification. If GLS shows a convincing folded trend, prefer the GLS-supported interpretation even if zoom-in morphology is ambiguous.
   • If obtain_BLS was called, take the result and feed it into analysis_LS together with
     • candidate_type : a complete BLS candidate list suggested by diagnose_plot_with_vlm
   • If obtain_zoom_in was called, take zoomed-in plot result path together with candidate_type as a list of zoom-in candidates suggested by diagnose_plot_with_vlm results and feed it into analyze_zoomed_plots to get detailed local feature analysis.
     • Zoom-in analysis is secondary to GLS for periodic variables.
     • Because the real period can be shorter than the zoom-in range, zoomed plots may fail to show the full repeating pattern even when GLS has identified the correct period.
     • Use zoom-in analysis mainly to inspect local morphology, data quality, and whether a proposed periodic interpretation is visibly contradicted by obvious local structure.
     • Be conservative: if no significant trend or coherent local morphology is observed after zoom-in, do not overrule a convincing GLS result and do not escalate the classification strength based on zoomed plots alone.
     • If the result from analyze_zoomed_plots suggests further zoom-in, invoke (3) and (4) again recursively until no further zoom-in is suggested.

7. Final Reporting: Aggregate all information (schema inspection + VSX/Gaia context + visual diagnosis + periodogram results + phase folding analysis) into the final diagnosis report. Your report must include:

   • The columns and scale chosen from the file head, including whether the light curve is multi-band.
   • The path to the diagnosis plot if one was generated.
   • VSX result and whether further diagnosis was skipped.
   • If VSX is available, explicitly use the VSX class, period, epoch, and match status in the diagnosis reasoning.
   • Write all returned VSX query results into the final report when they are available. Do not omit returned online-query fields; include the full VSX match payload in a dedicated report section.
   • A clear source-status statement:
     • If VSX identifies the source, explicitly state that it is an already cataloged / confirmed known variable rather than a new discovery.
     • If VSX does not identify the source, explicitly state that it remains an uncataloged candidate and that the classification is a new diagnosis candidate rather than a confirmed catalog identification.
   • Gaia astrometric and astrophysical parameters if they were available, including Teff, logg, and galaxy/binary hints when Gaia provides them.
   • If Gaia astrophysical parameters are available, explicitly use them in the diagnosis reasoning to support or weaken candidate classes. This includes at minimum stellar/non-stellar interpretation, galaxy likelihood, binary likelihood, and any useful Teff/logg constraints.
   • Write all returned Gaia query results into the final report when they are available. Do not omit returned online-query fields; include the full Gaia payload in a dedicated report section, and separately summarize the most diagnosis-relevant entries in the narrative.
   • Summary diagnosis with confidence level.
   • The most likely classification with reasoning.
   • If GLS and zoom-in evidence disagree, explain that GLS has higher priority for periodic diagnosis unless zoom-in reveals a clear contradiction or data-quality failure.
   • Key visual evidence (citing the plots generated).
   • Embed the diagnosis plot in the markdown report when the plot path is available, using standard markdown image syntax with the generated artifact path.
   • The results of the period analysis (best period, power, backend) if performed.
   • A list of the complete candidate types considered.
   • Level of scientific interest
   • requirements for follow-up observations (if any), and how urgent is the follow-up observation with reason.