Quick

Launch both subagents simultaneously:

Vault Scout (discovery-vault-scout):

Search the vault for what the user already knows about this topic.

Topic: <question keywords>
Vault path: {{VAULT}}/
Angle: <the specific question being asked>

Return relevant notes with content, and identify gaps.

Researcher (discovery-researcher):

Answer this specific question with web research.

Topic: <the question>
Depth: shallow
Existing knowledge: (empty — vault results not available yet)

Focus on answering the question directly, not mapping the landscape.
Find 2-3 sources. Source-resolve any academic claims.
Return: direct answer, supporting evidence, sources with metadata, confidence level.

Step 3: Synthesize Answer

Merge vault-scout and researcher results into a direct answer.

Structure:

• If vault has relevant notes, lead with what the user already knows and how the new info extends or updates it
• If vault contradicts web findings, flag it explicitly: "Your note X says Y, but recent evidence shows Z"
• If vault has nothing relevant, lead with the web findings
• Keep it to 3-10 sentences. Cite sources inline.
• End with confidence: high (multiple concordant sources), medium (single source or mixed), low (sparse evidence, flag uncertainty)

Tone: Conversational. Plain language. No hedging paragraphs — if uncertain, one line says so.

Step 4: Auto-Capture Gate

Evaluate silently in the main thread. Do not ask the user.

Novelty check: Compare researcher findings against vault-scout results. If the vault already covers >80% of the answer's substance, skip capture.

Substance check: Is the core insight a durable pattern, mechanism, or decision-relevant fact? If it's transient (today's weather, a live score, a price that will change next week), skip capture.

If both pass: Spawn a note-writer subagent (subagent_type: learning-loop:note-writer):

Write an inbox note for the Obsidian vault.

Insight: <the core durable insight from the answer>
Research: <researcher's findings with sources>
Related notes: <vault-scout's relevant note paths>
Source project: "conversation"
Date: <today YYYY-MM-DD>
Destination: 0-inbox/

Write the note directly to {{VAULT}}/0-inbox/<filename>.md using the Write tool.
Return the filename and title when done.

If either fails: No capture. Move to report.

Step 5: Report

One line:

Quick: "question" | Captured: "Note Title" → 0-inbox/filename.md

or

Quick: "question" | No capture (already known)

or

Quick: "question" | No capture (transient)

Then done. No follow-up suggestions. No source handoff. Back to what we were doing.

Subagent Usage

All agents exist. No new agents needed.

Key Principles

• One shot. No interactive rounds, no steering, no "what angle interests you?"
• Answer the question. Not "here's the landscape." Direct answer with evidence.
• Vault-integrated. Weave existing knowledge into the answer naturally.
• Auto-capture. Novel durable insights get captured silently. No prompting.
• Fast. Shallow research depth. Two parallel agents. Minimal main-thread work.
• Honest. If evidence is thin, say so in one line. Don't hedge for three paragraphs.