A specialized skill for analyzing evaluation scores and developing optimization strategies for grant/funding applications. Used by compliance-checker and plan-writer agents when optimizing scores per evaluation criterion and preemptively preventing disqualification risks. Automatically applied in contexts such as 'score optimization', 'evaluation criteria analysis', 'bonus point strategy', 'disqualification prevention', 'review preparation'. However, actual reviewer contact and review result retrieval are outside the scope of this skill.
A specialized skill that enhances the score optimization capabilities of compliance-checker and plan-writer agents.
| Evaluation Area | Typical Score | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Merit | 30-40 pts | Technical differentiation, innovativeness, IP ownership |
| Business Viability | 20-30 pts | Market size, revenue plan, commercialization strategy |
| Execution Capability | 15-25 pts | CEO experience, personnel, infrastructure |
| Plan Appropriateness | 10-20 pts | Implementation schedule, goal specificity |
| Policy Alignment | 5-10 pts | Government policy direction alignment |
| Bonus Points | Up to 5-10 pts | Women/disabled-owned enterprise, region, employment |
1. Extract scoring table from announcement → Map scores per item
2. Identify high-score items → Top 3 items = 60-70% of total
3. Among lower items, identify "zero if not addressed" mandatory items
4. Check bonus point items → Prioritize easily obtainable bonus points
| Criterion | High-Score Strategy | Failure Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Differentiation | Cite patents/papers, quantitative comparison vs. existing tech | Only using abstract "innovative" expressions |
| Technical Maturity | Specify TRL level, present prototype/PoC results | Staying at idea level |
| Technical Evidence | Include formulas/algorithms/architecture diagrams | Listing features without technical explanation |
| Criterion | High-Score Strategy | Failure Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Market Size | Step-wise TAM→SAM→SOM calculation with sources | Unsupported market size claims |
| Revenue Plan | Bottom-up estimation, specific sales channels | Top-down only estimation |
| Competitive Analysis | Positioning matrix, quantitative comparison tables | Claiming "no competitors" |
| Criterion | High-Score Strategy | Failure Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| CEO Capability | Specific listing of relevant experience years, awards/certifications | Summary resume only |
| Team Composition | Name + degree + experience for key personnel | Abstract "we have excellent talent" |
| Infrastructure | Specific equipment, facility, partnership lists | General descriptions |
| Evaluation Item | Max Score | Self-Assessment | Estimated Score | Improvable? | Strategy |
|----------------|----------|----------------|----------------|------------|----------|
| Technical Differentiation | 15 | 8/10 | 12 | Yes | Add patent filing evidence |
| Market Analysis | 10 | 6/10 | 6 | Yes | Strengthen market data |
| CEO Capability | 10 | 9/10 | 9 | Difficult | - |
| Budget Appropriateness | 5 | 7/10 | 3.5 | Yes | Strengthen calculation basis |
| **Total** | **100** | | **73.5** | | Target: 80+ |
Improve items with the highest score improvement relative to effort first:
Improvement ROI = (Expected Score Improvement) / (Required Effort)
| Bonus Item | Typical Score | Acquisition Difficulty | Preparation Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Women-owned Enterprise | 2-3 pts | Automatic | Women's enterprise certificate |
| Social Enterprise | 2-3 pts | Medium | Certification |
| Employment Excellence | 1-3 pts | Medium | Employment increase documentation |
| Regional Location | 1-2 pts | Automatic | Business registration |
| Green Technology | 1-3 pts | High | Green technology certification |
Strategy: Always claim automatically obtainable bonus points, and prepare for medium-difficulty bonus points in advance.