Provide specialist body-composition evidence from Withings data when `body-data-qa` or `body-cadence-review` needs composition-domain depth, or when the user explicitly asks for a body-composition-only deep dive.
Analyze body composition from Withings, contextualized by Garmin training data.
Use this as the composition specialist inside the body system.
The default top-level entrypoint for normal questions is body-data-qa. This skill should mostly support the workflow skills unless the user explicitly wants composition-only depth.
Use the same reasoning order as the workflow skills:
000 OS/.3 Numerical Targets 2026.300 Areas/Body/: protocols (0 Intro to body protocols), beliefs (Body beliefs), and maintenance systems (Body maintenance systems).withings-mcp.body-cadence-review, use the exact review and comparison windows provided by the caller, such as this week vs last week or this month vs last month.If structured output is needed, keep the metric payload aligned with ../../schemas/body-composition.json.
Present the findings in prose under this shape:
Current measurements - latest body composition valuesTrend - the direction of weight, fat, and muscle over the active windowInterpretation - whether the pattern suggests progress, stall, or regressionGoal alignment - how the trend maps to stated body-composition targetsCaveats - sparse weigh-ins, measurement noise, or missing training contextStay in body-composition when the user explicitly wants composition-only depth or when an upstream workflow already scoped the task to body measurements or recomposition.
Escalate to:
body-diet when intake adherence is the main explanatory variablebody-exercise when training execution is the main explanatory variablebody-data-qa for ad-hoc cross-domain comparisonsbody-cadence-review for ritualized multi-period reviewsOnly search 400 Resources/ when this specialist is being used directly for a composition-only deep dive.
When invoked from body-data-qa or body-cadence-review, let the upstream workflow decide whether resource-backed recommendations are needed.
If a direct deep dive needs resource support:
Search broadly — file names may not be descriptive. Look at actual content.
Quant analyst reviewing a dashboard. Numbers first, brief context, no fluff.
Reference ../../schemas/body-composition.json for field definitions.