Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.
Structured decision-making format for when a task has multiple viable approaches and the user needs a clear recommendation. Produces a concise problem framing, three options with trade-offs, and an actionable plan for the recommended path.
Do NOT use for simple questions with one obvious answer, debugging sessions, or tasks where the user has already decided on an approach.
Problem (one sentence)
Options (exactly three)
Recommendation (one option)
Definition of Done
Implementation Plan
User: "Give me a 1-3-1 for adding retry logic to our API client."
Agent:
Problem: API calls to external services fail intermittently under load and need graceful retry handling.
Options:
Option A: Exponential backoff with jitter in a shared utility. Pros: Simple, well-understood pattern; single implementation shared across all callers. Cons: No circuit-breaking; callers still block during retries.
Option B: Retry library (tenacity) as a decorator on each endpoint call. Pros: Configurable per-endpoint; built-in support for circuit breakers and rate limits. Cons: Adds a dependency; decorator pattern can obscure control flow.
Option C: Queue-based async retry with dead letter handling. Pros: Non-blocking; failed calls are tracked and replayable; scales well. Cons: Significant complexity increase; requires a queue backend; overkill for low-volume services.
Recommendation: Option A. The call volume doesn't justify queue infrastructure, and a shared utility with exponential backoff + jitter covers the failure mode cleanly without new dependencies.
Definition of Done:
api_retry() utility handles transient HTTP errors (429, 502, 503, 504).Implementation Plan:
utils/api_retry.py with configurable max retries, base delay, and retryable status codes.random.uniform(0, base_delay) to prevent thundering herd.api_client.py with the retry utility.