Compare a proposed alternative to the agent's prior recommendation (or shared ideation) using criteria that fit the situation. Use when the user pastes a counter-proposal and wants an explicit agree/disagree and an updated stance.
The user supplies alternative research or a recommendation. Compare it to your current recommendation or the plan you and the user have been developing (restate that stance briefly if the thread does not already make it obvious).
Do not assume every comparison must include ease of integration, security, or operational cost—use them only when they are relevant to the user’s context, criteria, or the nature of the decision.
Use headings and bullets that match the criteria you actually used. The following is only an illustration when integration and security happen to matter:
Prior: managed Postgres + migrations in-repo. Alternative: SQLite per tenant. User cares about multi-tenant isolation and backup. Verdict: partial — SQLite wins local simplicity but fails the stated isolation/backup bar unless augmented; would not adopt as-is.