Maps the buying committee at a target account — identify decision-makers, influencers, champions, and blockers, then recommend a multi-threading strategy. Use when stuck single-threaded in a deal, don't know who the real decision-maker is, can't figure out the right entry point at a target account, deal stalled because you're not talking to enough people, or unsure how to map the buying committee. Do NOT use for building prospect lists across many accounts (use /sales-prospect-list), general account research (use /sales-research), deal health assessment (use /sales-deal-inspect), or ZoomInfo-specific org chart config (use /sales-zoominfo).
Help the user map the full buying committee at a target account — identify who's involved in the purchase decision, what role each person plays, and how to multi-thread the account effectively. This skill is platform-agnostic but references Apollo.io as the primary data source for finding and enriching contacts. The same approach works with ZoomInfo, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, or any contact database.
If references/learnings.md exists, read it first for accumulated knowledge.
Ask the user:
Which account are you targeting? (Company name, size, industry)
What are you selling?
Where are you in the process?
What do you know already?
Company size? (This determines committee complexity)
If the user's request already provides most of this context, skip directly to the relevant step. Lead with your best-effort answer using reasonable assumptions (stated explicitly), then ask only the most critical 1-2 clarifying questions at the end — don't gate your response behind gathering complete context.
Map expected roles using this framework:
| Role | What they do | How to identify | Typical titles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Buyer | Has budget authority, signs the check | Highest-ranking person in the buying org; often VP+ or C-suite | VP/SVP/CRO/CFO/CTO depending on what you sell |
| Champion | Wants your product to win, advocates internally | Has the problem you solve, engaged in conversations, asks for resources to share internally | Director/Senior Manager who owns the problem |
| Technical Evaluator | Vets the product technically | Asks detailed technical questions, runs POCs, owns integration | Architect, Staff Engineer, IT Manager, Solutions team |
| User Buyer | Will use the product daily | Cares about workflow, UX, and day-to-day impact | Individual contributors, team leads, end users |
| Coach | Gives you intel on internal politics and process | Usually someone you have a relationship with; may not have buying authority | Any level — could be a former customer, mutual connection, or friendly contact |
| Gatekeeper/Blocker | Can slow or kill the deal | Owns competing budget, prefers a competitor, or has political reasons to oppose | Procurement, Legal, IT Security, or a peer of the Champion who prefers the status quo |
| Company size | Roles to map | Contacts to find |
|---|---|---|
| SMB (1-200) | Economic Buyer + Champion (often the same person), maybe 1 Technical Evaluator | 2-3 contacts |
| Mid-market (200-2,000) | Economic Buyer, Champion, Technical Evaluator, 1-2 User Buyers | 4-6 contacts |
| Enterprise (2,000+) | All 6 roles, potentially multiple people per role (committee of 8-12+) | 6-12 contacts |
For the target account, run a People Search with these filters:
Apollo (and most data providers) don't show reporting lines directly. Reconstruct the org chart by:
The most important person in the deal often doesn't have an obvious title:
For each committee member identified, enrich to get:
Build a visual mental model of the account:
[Economic Buyer]
/ \
[Champion] [Potential Blocker]
/ \ |
[Tech Evaluator] [User Buyer] [Their Champion]
| Situation | Recommended entry | Why |
|---|---|---|
| No existing contacts | Champion or Coach | They have the problem, they'll advocate. Going straight to the C-suite without context usually fails. |
| Have one contact | Ask them to introduce you up or across | Warm introductions convert 5-10x better than cold outreach |
| Active deal, single-threaded | Technical Evaluator or User Buyer | Expand laterally before going up — build consensus first |
| Stuck deal | Coach (for intel) or Economic Buyer (direct escalation) | Find out what's blocking before escalating |
The goal: Engage 3+ contacts at different levels of the org before a decision is made. Single-threaded deals close at 1/3 the rate of multi-threaded deals.
"Power line" vs "access line" approach:
Don't engage everyone at once — stagger over 2-3 weeks to avoid looking like you're carpet-bombing the account.
Each committee member needs a different message:
| Role | Message focus | Tone | Channel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Buyer | Business outcomes, ROI, strategic alignment | Executive-level, concise, metric-driven | Email or warm intro, then executive briefing |
| Champion | Problem validation, how you solve it, internal advocacy materials | Collaborative, detailed, give them ammo | Email + call + LinkedIn |
| Technical Evaluator | Integration, security, architecture, POC plan | Technical, specific, no hand-waving | Email + call, offer a technical deep-dive |
| User Buyer | Day-to-day impact, workflow improvements, ease of adoption | Practical, show-don't-tell | Demo, free trial, or sandbox |
| Coach | Gratitude, keep them informed, ask for intel on internal dynamics | Personal, relationship-first | Call or LinkedIn message |
/sales-cadence — Design the multi-channel sequence for each committee member/sales-discovery — Prep discovery questions tailored to each role/sales-deal-inspect — Assess deal health once the committee is mapped/sales-enrich — Enrich all committee members with verified contact info/sales-intent — Check for buying signals at the account level/sales-zoominfo — ZoomInfo platform help (org charts, Scoops, Engage)/sales-do — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skills sales-doThe committee isn't static. Monitor for:
Set up Apollo alerts for the account to catch these changes.
Don't go straight to the C-suite. Claude defaults to recommending you email the CEO. Start with the Champion or Coach — someone who has the problem your product solves and will advocate internally. Cold-emailing the CEO of a 5,000-person company about your SaaS tool rarely works.
Don't treat titles as org chart. A "Director" at a 50-person startup and a "Director" at a Fortune 500 are completely different levels of authority. Always factor in company size before mapping titles to committee roles.
Don't over-thread small accounts. A 200-person company doesn't have a 7-person buying committee. Adapt the framework to company size — 2-3 contacts for SMB, 5-8 for mid-market, 8-12 for enterprise. Over-threading a small account feels like overkill and can backfire.
Don't assume the org chart is stable. People change roles, teams reorg, companies restructure. Check job tenure and recent title changes in Apollo before building your map. A map based on 6-month-old data may be wrong.
Self-improving: If you discover something not covered here, append it to references/learnings.md with today's date.
User says: "Map the buying committee at Acme Corp for our security product" Skill does:
User says: "I'm selling to a 100-person startup. Who do I need to talk to?" Skill does:
User says: "I have a champion at BigCo but the deal is stuck. Who else should I bring in?" Skill does:
Cause: Small company, or data provider has limited coverage for that account Solution: Try multiple data sources (Apollo + LinkedIn Sales Navigator). For small companies, the entire leadership team may be on the company's website. Ask your existing contact for org structure intel.
Cause: Job change — your internal advocate is gone Solution: Two actions: (1) Reach out to the Champion at their new company — they're a warm lead there. (2) At the original account, find a new Champion quickly — the deal will stall without internal advocacy. Check who the Champion was working with and whether they share the same problem.
Cause: Common in mid-market — titles overlap and authority is ambiguous Solution: Ask the "budget question" — "Who would need to approve the budget for this?" and the "signature question" — "Whose signature goes on the contract?" The real Economic Buyer controls the money. Everyone else is an influencer, regardless of what they say.